Samenvatting
Inleiding In dit artikel wordt verslag gedaan van een workshop over de problemen en oplossingen rond de deelname van huisartsen aan wetenschappelijk onderzoek. In totaal 24 deelnemers, huisartsen en onderzoekers, bezochten de workshop. Discussies werden gevoerd rond drie thema's: motivatie om deel te nemen; organisatie van het onderzoeksproject en beloning voor deelname.
Uitkomsten De meeste suggesties die tijdens de workshop werden gedaan betroffen de opzet van onderzoeksprojecten, de ondersteuning en beloning van huisartsen en praktijkassistenten en de verstrekking van informatie en feedback. De uitkomsten van de workshop en enkele bevindingen uit de literatuur zijn samengebracht in een checklist die onderzoekers kunnen gebruiken bij het opzetten van huisartsgeneeskundig onderzoek. Beschouwing Naast het gebruik van de checklist doen wij een aantal aanbevelingen om deelname van huisartsen aan onderzoek te bevorderen: het opzetten van een registratiesysteem voor de onderzoekswensen van huisartsen, het incorporeren van wetenschappelijk onderzoek in het takenpakket van huisartsen en vergoeding van de extra kosten van eerstelijnsonderzoek door subsidiegevers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatuur
Knottnerus JA. Research in general practice. Lancet 1996;347:1236-8.
Knottnerus JA, Dinant GJ. Medicine based evidence, a prerequisite for evidence based medicine. BMJ 1997;315:1109-10.
Kaner EFS, Haighton CA, McAvoy BR. ‘So much post, so busy with practice, so no time!’: a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys. Br J Gen Pract 1998;48:1067-9.
Levinson W, Dull VT, Roter DL, Chaumeton H, Frankel RM. Recruiting physicians for office-based research. Med Care 1998;36:934-7.
Ward E, King M, Lloyd M, Bower P, Friedli K. Conducting randomized trials in general practice: methodological and practical issues. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:919-22.
Borgiel AEM, Dunn EV, Lamont CT, MacDonald PJ, Evensen MK, Bass MJ, et al. Recruiting family physicians as participants in research. Fam Pract 1989;6:168-72.
Peto V, Coulter A, Bond A. Factors affecting general practitioners' recruitment of patients into a prospective study. Fam Pract 1993;10:207-11.
Gray RW, Woodward NJ, Carter YH. Barriers to the development of collaborative research in general practice: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:221-2.
Murphy E, Spiegal N, Kinmonth AL. ‘Will you help me with my research?’ Gaining access to primary care settings and subjects. Br J Gen Pract 1992;42:162-5.
Van der Windt DAWM, Van Aarst M, Heemskerk MAMB, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Practical aspects of conducting a randomised trial. Br J Gen Pract 2000;50:371-4.
Tognoni G, Alli C, Avanzini F, Bettelli G, Colombo F, Corso R, et al. Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure. BMJ 1991;303:969-71.
Plane MB, Beasley JW, Wiesen P, McBride P, Underbakke G. Physician attitudes toward research study participation: a focus group. Wisconsin Medical Journal 1998;97:49-51.
Aylett M, Creighton P, Jachuck S. Randomised clinical trials in general practice. BMJ 1992;304:846.
Heywood A, Mudge P, Rong I, Sanson-Fisher R. Reducing systematic bias in studies of general practitioners: the use of a medical peer in the recruitment of general practitioners in research. Fam Pract 1995;12:227-31.
Jonker PL, Sumajow CA. Randomised clinical trials in general practice. BMJ 1992;304:508.
Smidt N. Conservative treatments for tennis elbow in primary care [Proefschrift]. Amsterdam: EMGO-instituut, 2001:143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Huibers MJh, Van der Windt DAWM, Boeke AJP. Participation of general practitioners in primary care research. Huisarts Wet 2002;45(9):454-8.
It is becoming increasingly difficult in the Netherlands to recruit GPs willing to take part in research projects. This article reports on the outcomes of a workshop on the problems posed by the participation of GPs in research activities and on the solutions offered. The workshop was held during the annual research conference of the Dutch College of General Practitioners in 2001. A total of 24 general practitioners and researchers took part in the workshop, in which three major issues were discussed: the motivation of GPs to participate in research, the organisation of the research project and the incentives for participation in research. Suggestions for solving some of the problems posed by GP involvement in research primarily concerned the design of research projects, support and incentives for GPs and practice assistants and the procedures for information and feedback. These suggestions and other outcomes, together with some findings drawn from the research literature, formed the basis for the construction of a checklist. The main purpose of the checklist is to provide researchers with relevant considerations in the design of primary care research projects that might encourage GPs to participate. Recommendations were also made for the promotion of active participation of GPs in primary care research: collective registration of the individual GP's research wishes, incorporation of research activities as a regular and accepted element in GP tasks and the acknowledgement by grant-awarding organisations of the additional costs inevitable in primary care research.
Capaciteitsgroep Epidemiologie en Capaciteitsgroep
Huisartsgeneeskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Postbus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht: drs. M.J.H. Huibers, psycholoog; afdeling
Huisartsgeneeskunde EMGO, VU Medisch Centrum: dr. D.A.W.M. van der Windt, epidemioloog, dr. A.J.P. Boeke, huisartsonderzoeker.
Mogelijke belangenverstrengeling: niets aangegeven.
About this article
Cite this article
Huibers, M., van der Windt, D. & Boeke, J. De deelname van huisartsen aan wetenschappelijk onderzoekmethodologie onderzoek wetenschappelijk onderzoek . HUWE 45, 299–304 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03082886
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03082886