Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Richtlijnen voor RCT's en systematische reviews

  • Journaal
  • Published:
Huisarts en wetenschap Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  • Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001;323:334-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: explanation and elobartion. Ann Intern Med 2001:134:663-94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CONSORT: https://doi.org/www.consort-statement.org

  • Moher D Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF.Improving the quality or reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOR-OM statement. Lancet 1999;354:1896-1900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. A proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

About this article

Cite this article

Richtlijnen voor RCT's en systematische reviews. HUWE 44, 171 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03082389

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03082389

Search

Navigation