Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Verpleegkundige Revalidatierichtlijn Beroerte

  • Richtlijnen
  • Published:
Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice

Samenvatting

De beroerte is één van de belangrijkste doodsoorzaken in onze westerse wereld en de belangrijkste oorzaak voor invaliditeit. Mensen die herstellen van een beroerte, gaan een lang en zwaar traject in. En ook voor verpleegkundigen is het omgaan met deze patiënten niet eenvoudig, vooral ook omdat de oude NDT-richtlijn niet meer voldeed. Er ontstond behoefte aan een nieuwe, evidence- based richtlijn. En die is er gekomen. Met de Verpleegkundige Revalidatierichtlijn Beroerte kunnen verpleegkundigen nu effectiever en efficiënter handelen. Dit artikel behandelt de totstandkoming ervan en belicht de belangrijkste aanbevelingen uit de richtlijn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Alleen de meest recente referenties voor aanbevelingen zijn hierin meegenomen.

Literatuur

  1. World Health Organisation The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke 2004. Hppt://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/resources/atlas/en/

  2. Bots M L Berger van M., Jager-Geurts MH Bos M. Reitsma JB, Breteler MMMB & Bruin A de. Incidentie van cerebrovasculaire ziekten in Nederland 2000, in Hart- en Vaatziekten in Nederland. Jager Geurts MH et al. Nederlandse Hartstichting, Den Haag, 35-36 2006.

  3. Van Leest LATM, Koek HL, Van Trijp MJCA, Van Dis SJ, Peters RJG, Bots ML & Verschuren WMM. Hart en Vaatziekten in Nederland 2005, cijfer over risicofactoren, ziekten, behandeling en sterfte. Nederlandse Hartstichting, Den Haag, 2005.

  4. Van Straten A, Reitsma JB, Limburg M, van den Bos GA, de Haan RJ. Impact of stroke type on survival and functional health. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;12(1):27-33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Schuurmans MJ. Verpleegkundige Revalidatierichtlijn Beroerte Elsevier Gezondheidszorg, Maarsen 2009.

  6. Werkgroep Hersiening Consensus Richtlijn Beroerte 2000, Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, Nederlandse Hartstichting, Internet: http://www.cbo.nl, http://www.hartstichting.nl.

  7. Schottisch Intercollegial Guideline Network (SIGN) 2008 A Guideline Developers Handbook SIGN 50; www.sign.ac.uk.

  8. Evidence-based Richtlijnontwikkeling: Handleiding voor werkgroepleden. Gezondheidszorg CBO 2007.

  9. Agree collaboration Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation: AGREE instrument www.agreecollaboration.org.

  10. Revalidatie na een beroerte, Werkgroep Nederlandse Hartstichting, Revalidatie na een beroerte, richtlijnen en aanbevelingen voor zorgverleners 2001.

  11. Guidelines Royal College of Physicians (Update 2008).

  12. Stroke Assessment Across the Continuum of Care Nursing best practice guidelines. Registered Nurses Association of Ontario. http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?ss=15&doc_id=7426&nbr=4385 2005.

  13. Life after stroke. New Zealand guideline for management of stroke (2003), The New Zealand Guidelines Group. Life after stroke: New Zealand guideline for management of stroke: best practice - evidence based practice Wellington: Stroke Foundation of New Zealand Inc.; New Zealand Guidelines Group 2003.

  14. Richtlijn beroerte Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap Fysiotherapie 2004.

  15. Ergotherapie Richtlijn beroerte, Nederlandse Vereniging voor Ergotherapie 2005.

  16. Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, et al. Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke 2005; 36:9:e100-e143.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adams et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischaemic stroke, American Stroke Association 2003.

  18. Teasell et al. Evidence based review of stroke rehabilitation, Canadian Stroke Network 2005.

  19. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2005.

  20. Melnyk BM og Finout-Overholt E. Evidence Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care A guide to best practice (1 útgáfa) Lippincott willliams & Wilkins 2005.

  21. Verhagen, AP, de Vet HCW, de Bie RA, Kessels AGH, Boers M, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG. The Delphi-list: A criterialist for quality assessment of randomised clinical trials for conducting systematic review developed by Delphi consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998, 51, 12, 1235-1241.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oxman AD Checklist for review articles. British Medical Journal, (1994), 309:648-651.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moher D. Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al Improving the quality of meta analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. The Lancet Volume 354, 1999 1896-1900.

    Google Scholar 

  24. LoBiondo-Wood G. and Haber J. Nursing Research – Methods, Critical Appraisal and Utilisation (pg. 168), St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2002.

  25. Rensink M, Schuurmans M, Lindeman E, Hafsteinsdóttir T. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2009;65(4):737-54.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Varekamp R, Rensink M, Lindeman E, Schuurmans M Clinical Nursing Rehabilitation Stroke Guideline: A Feasibility Study(Submitted)

  27. Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet Neurology 2004;3: 528-536.

  28. Page SJ Gater DR Bach-y-Rita P Reconsidering the Motor Recovery Plateau in Stroke Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1377-81.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peurala SH, Tarkka IM, Pitkanen K, Sivenius J. The effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86(8):1557-1564.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Winstein CJ, Wing, A.M., Whitall, J. Motor control and learning principles for rehabilitation of upper limb movements after brain injury. In: Grafman, J. & Robertson L., eds. Plasticity and Rehabilitation, Elsevier, 2003, 79-138.

  31. Kornetti DL, Fritz SL, Chiu YP, Light KE, Velozo CA. Rating scale analysis of the Berg Balance Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004; 85(7):1128-1135.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Monger C, Carr JH, Fowler V. Evaluation of a home-based exercise and training programme to improve sit-to-stand in patients with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil, 2002;16(4):361-367.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cheng PT, Wu SH, Liaw MY, Wong AM, Tang FT. Symmetrical body-weight distribution training in stroke patients and its effect on fall prevention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82(12):1650-1654.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Peurala SH, Tarkka IM, Pitkanen K, Sivenius J. The effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86(8):1557-1564.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M. Educational and Clinical Practice Committee, European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr. 2003; 22(4):415-21.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Philip J, Garry Nourhashemi F, Bennahum D, Lauque S, Albarede J-L. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its Use in Grading the Nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition 1999; 15(2):116-122.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Salter K, Teasell R, Bhogal S, Foley N, Orange JB, Speechley M. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation, Aphasia. Departments of Physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005 London, Ontario, Canada.

  38. Worrall L, McCooye R, Davidson B, Larkins B, Hickson L. The validity of functional assesments of communication and the Activity? Participation components of the ICIDH-2: do they reflect what really happens in real-life? J Commun Dis 2002; 35:107-137.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kumlien S, Axelsson K. The nursing care of stroke patients in nursing homes. Nurses’ descriptions and experiences relating to cognition and mood. J Clin Nurs 2000; 9(4):489-497.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Giaquinto S, Buzzelli S, Francesco L, Nolfe G. Evaluation of sexual changes after stroke. J Clin Psychiatr 2003; 64:302-307.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Garrett, D. & Cowdell, F. (2005). Information needs of patients and carers following stroke. Nursing Older People 17:14-16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. www.bsl.nl/shop/nedtijdschrift-voor-evidence-1572-2082.html

    Thóra B Hafsteinsdóttir

Authors
  1. Thóra B Hafsteinsdóttir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

onderzoeker en projectleider, lectoraat Paramedische Zorg voor Mensen met Chronische Aandoening, Hogeschool Utrecht en University of Iceland en voorzitter werkgroep, divisie Hersenen, UMC Utrecht

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hafsteinsdóttir, T.B. Verpleegkundige Revalidatierichtlijn Beroerte. NTEB 7, 18–22 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080109

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080109

Search

Navigation