Skip to main content
Log in

Effecten van intensieve huisbezoekenprogramma's

Een systematische literatuurstudie voor ouderen met gezondheidsproblemen

  • Wetenschappelijk artikel
  • Published:
Tijdschrift voor VerpleeghuisGeneeskunde

Samenvatting

Het doel van deze literatuurstudie is om de effectiviteit na te gaan van intensieve huisbezoekenprogramma's aan ouderen met gezondheidsproblemen of functionele beperkingen. Het doorzoeken van de literatuur was gebaseerd op de ingesloten experimenten van vier literatuurstudies over de effectiviteit van huisbezoeken, gepubliceerd vanaf 2000, en de databestanden van Cinahl, Cochrane, Embase, Medline en PsycINFO vanaf 2001. De zoekstrategie identificeerde 844 studies, waarvan acht voldeden aan de inclusiecriteria. Zeven experimenten waren van voldoende methodologische kwaliteit; geen van deze experimenten hadden, op basis van de belangrijkste analyses, een significant gunstig effect voor de interventiegroep in vergelijking met de controlegroep op mortaliteit, gezondheid, zorggebruik of kosten. De inclusie van minder intensieve programma's voor kwetsbare ouderen zou weinig invloed uitgeoefend hebben op de conclusies van onze literatuurstudie. We concluderen dat huisbezoekenprogramma's niet zinvol lijken voor oudere personen met (ervaren) gezondheidsproblemen binnen het gezondheidszorgsysteem van westerse landen.

Abstract

The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of intensive home visiting programs targeting older people with poor health or otherwise with functional impairments. A search for literature was based on included trials from four reviews on the effectiveness of home visits published after 2000 and on a database search of Cinahl, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline and PsycINFO from 2001 onwards. The search identified 844 abstracts; eight papers met the inclusion criteria. Seven trials were of sufficient methodological quality; none of the trials showed a significant favorable effect for the main analysis comparing the intervention group with the control group on mortality, health status, service use or cost. The inclusion of less-intensive intervention programs for frail older persons would not have exerted a great influence on the findings of our review. We conclude that home visiting programs appear not to be beneficial for older people with poor health within the health care setting of Western countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

literatuur

  1. van Haastregt JC, Diederiks JP,van Rossum E, de Witte LP,Crebolder HF: Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people living in the community: systematic review. BMJ 2000,320:754-758.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elkan R, Kendrick D, Dewey M, Hewitt M, Robinson J, Blair M, Williams D, Brummell K: Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2001,323:719-725.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stuck AE, Egger M, Hammer A, Minder CE, Beck JC: Home visits to prevent nursing home admission and functional decline in elderly people: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.JAm Med Ass 2002,287:1022-1028.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meinck M,Lubke N, Lauterberg J, Robra BP: [Preventive home visits to the elderly: systematic review of available evidence]. Gesundheitswesen 2004,66:732-738.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Markle-Reid M, Browne G,Weir R, Gafni A, Roberts J, Henderson SR:The effectiveness and efficiency of home-based nursing health promotion for older people: a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2006,63:531-569.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elkan R, Kendrick D:What is the effectivess of home visiting or homebased support for older people? http://www.eurowhoint/Document/e83105pdf .

  7. Ploeg J,Feightner J, Hutchison B, Patterson C,Sigouin C,Gauld M: Effectiveness of preventive primary care outreach interventions aimed at older people: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can Fam Physician 2005,51:1244-1245.

  8. van Rossum E, Frederiks CM, Philipsen H, Portengen K, Wiskerke J, Knipschild P: Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people. BMJ 1993, 307:27-32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Rossum E: Effects of preventive home visits to the elderly. PhD Thesis Maastricht University, 1993.

  10. Nicolaides-Bouman A,van Rossum E, Kempen GI, Knipschild P: Effects of home visits by home nurses to elderly people with health problems: design of a randomised clinical trial in the Netherlands [ISRCTN92017183]. BMC Health Serv Res 2004,4:35.

  11. Nicolaides-Bouman A, van Rossum E, Habets H, Kempen GI, Knipschild P: Home visiting programme for older people with health problems: process evaluation. J Adv Nurs 2007, 58:425-435.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bouman A, van Rossum E,Ambergen T, Kempen G, Knipschild P: Effects of a home visiting programme for older people with poor health status: a randomised clinical trial in the Netherlands. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56(3):397-404.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bouman A, van Rossum E, Evers S,Ambergen T, Kempen G, Knipschild P: Effects on health care use and associated cost of a home visiting program for older people with a poor health status: a randomised clinical trial in the Netherlands. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008;63:291-297.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bouman A, van Rossum E, Nelemans P, Kempen GIJM, Knipschild P: Effects of intensive home visiting programs for older people with poor health status: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:74.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bula CJ,Berod AC, Stuck AE,Alessi CA,Aronow HU, Santos Eggimann B,Rubenstein LZ, Beck JC: Effectiveness of preventive in-home geriatric assessment in well functioning, community-dwelling older people: secondary analysis of a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999, 47:389-395.

  16. Stuck AE, Minder CE, Peter Wuest I, Gillmann G, Egli C, Kesselring A, Leu RE, Beck JC:A randomized trial of in-home visits for disability prevention in community-dwelling older people at low and high risk for nursing home admission. Arch Int Med 2000, 160:977-986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bernabei R, Landi F, Gambassi G, Sgadari A, Zuccala G, Mor V, Rubenstein LZ, Carbonin P: Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community. BMJ Clin Res ed 1998,316:1348-1351.

    Google Scholar 

  18. van Tulder MW, Assendelft WJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM: Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders. Spine 1997, 22:2323-2330.

    Google Scholar 

  19. van Tulder MW,Cherkin DC, Berman B,Lao L, Koes BW:The effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of acute and chronic low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 1999,24:1113-1 123.

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Hout HP, Nijpels G, van Marwijk HW, Jansen AP,Van't Veer PJ,Tybout W, Stalman WA: Design and pilot results of a single blind randomized controlled trial of systematic demand-led home visits by nurses to frail elderly persons in primary care [ISRCTN05358495]. BMC Geriatr 2005,5:1 1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hall N: Randomized trial of a health promotion program for frail elders. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du vieillissement 1992, 1 1:72-91.

  22. Dalby DM, Sellors JW, Fraser FD, Fraser C, van Ineveld C, Howard M: Effect of preventive home visits by a nurse on the outcomes of frail elderly people in the community: a randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal /Journal de l'Association Medicale Canadienne 2000, 162:497-500.

    Google Scholar 

  23. YamadaY, Ikegami N: Preventive home visits for community-dwelling frail elderly people based on Minimum Data Set-Home Care: Randomized controlled trial. Geriatr and Gerontol Intern 2003,3:236-242.

  24. van Haastregt JC, Diederiks JP, van Rossum E, de Witte LP,Voorhoeve PM, Crebolder HF: Effects of a programme of multifactorial home visits on falls and mobility impairments in elderly people at risk: randomised controlled trial.[comment]. BMJ 2000,321:994-998.

  25. van Haastregt JC: Preventing falls and mobility impairments in elderly people living in the community. PhD thesis Maastricht University, 2002.

  26. van Haastregt JC, van Rossum E, Diederiks JP, de Witte LP,Voorhoeve PM, Crebolder HF: Process-evaluation of a home visit programme to prevent falls and mobility impairments among elderly people at risk. Patient Education and Counseling 2002,47:301-309.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chicester: Wiley; 2005.

  28. Williams EI, Greenwell J, Groom LM:The care of people over 75 years old after discharge from hospital: an evaluation of timetabled visiting by Health Visitor Assistants. J Public Health Med 1992,14:138-144.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nikolaus T, Bach M: Preventing falls in community-dwelling frail older people using a home intervention team (HIT): results from the randomized Falls-HIT trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003, 51:300-305.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tinetti ME, Baker DI, McAvay G, Claus EB, Garrett P, Gottschalk M, Koch ML,Trainor K, Horwitz RI: A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1994,331:821-827.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hansen FR, Spedtsberg K, Schroll M: Geriatric follow-up by home visits after discharge from hospital: a randomized controlled trial. Age and ageing 1992, 21:445-450.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Markle-Reid M, Weir R, Browne G, Roberts J, Gafni A, Henderson S: Health promotion for frail older home care clients.J Adv Nurs 2006, 54:38 1-395.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pathy MS, Bayer A, Harding K, Dibble A: Randomised trial of case finding and surveillance of elderly people at home. Lancet 1992,340:890-893.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Balaban DJ, Goldfarb NI, Perkel RL, Carlson BL: Follow-up study of an urban family medicine home visit program. J Fam Pract 1988,26:307-3 12.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dunn RB, Lewis PA,Vetter NJ,Guy PM,Hardman CS,Jones RW: Health visitor intervention to reduce days of unplanned hospital re-admission in patients recently discharged from geriatric wards: the results of a randomised controlled study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1994, 18:15-23.

  36. Fletcher AE, Price GM, Ng ES, Stirling SL, Bulpitt CJ, Breeze E, Nunes M, Jones DA, Latif A, Fasey NM,et al: Population-based multidimensional assessment of older people in UK general practice: a cluster-randomised factorial trial. Lancet 2004,364:1667-1677.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hebert R, Robichaud L, Roy PM, Bravo G,Voyer L: Efficacy of a nurse-led multidimensional preventive programme for older people at risk of functional decline.A randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing 2001, 30:147-153.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fried LP,Tangen CM,Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J,SeemanT,Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA: Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001,56:M 146-156.

  39. Markle-Reid M, Browne G: Conceptualizations of frailty in relation to older adults. J Adv Nurs 2003,44:58-68.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Idler EL, Benyamini Y: Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health & Soc Beh 1997,38:21-37.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Moher D, Schulz KF,Altman DG:The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2001, 134:657-662.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH:A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses.Ann Intern Med 1992, I 16:78-84.

  43. Pocock SJ, Hughes MD, Lee RJ: Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials.A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med 1987,3 17:426-432.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stuck A, Kane RL:Whom Do Preventive Home Visits Help? J Am Geriatr Soc 2007, Editorial comments:56(3):561-563

  45. Gill T, Baker DI, Gottschalk M, Gahbauer E, Charpentier P,de Regt P,Wallace S:A prehabilita-tion program for physically frail community-living older persons.Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:394-404.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Phelan EA,Williams B, Penninx BW, LoGerfo JP, Leveille SG:Activities of daily living function and disability in older adults in a randomized trial of the health enhancement program. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004,59:838-843.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Naylor MD, Brooten D, Campbell R, Jacobsen BS, Mezey MD, Pauly MV, Schwartz JS: Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial.J Am Med Ass 1999,281:613-620.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Onder G, Liperoti R, Soldato M, Carpenter I, Steel K, Bernabei R, Landi F: Case management and risk of nursing home admission for older adults in home care: results of the AgeD in HOme Care Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007, 55:439-444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Faculty of health, Medicine and life Sciences, vakgroep epidemiologie, Universiteit Maastricht

Faculty of health, Medicine and life Sciences, vakgroep Verpleging en Verzorging, Universiteit Maastricht

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouman, A.I.E., van Rossum, E., Nelemans, P. et al. Effecten van intensieve huisbezoekenprogramma's. TVVG 33, 148–154 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03078542

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03078542

Navigation