Netherlands Journal of Psychology

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 46–64 | Cite as

Evaluative conditioning: missing, presumed dead

  • Andy P. FieldEmail author
  • Kristy R. R. Lascelles
  • Kathryn J. Lester
  • Chris Askew
  • Graham C. L. Davey


Although research into evaluative conditioning (EC) has progressed considerably over the past 30 years, there have been some doubts about the strength and reliability of conditioning effects – especially when visual stimuli are used. Partly this has been due to well-documented methodological debates and empirical evidence of alternative causes of apparent learning (Field & Davey, 1999). The seeds of doubt have undoubtedly been nurtured, also by the numerous informal reports of researchers failing to obtain EC effects – even when replicating previously successful paradigms. This has led some to talk of boundary conditions that could enhance or eliminate the effects in EC experiments (De Houwer, Baeyens, Vansteenwegen & Eelen, 2000). This paper summarises 12 experiments that have explored this elusive phenomenon with mixed results (even when replicating past procedures). These various experiments are used to attempt to draw conclusions about what boundary conditions might exist for evaluative conditioning. (Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 64, 46-64.)


valuative conditioning 


  1. Baeyens, F., Crombez, G., Hendrickx, H. & Eelen, P. (1995). Parameters of Human Evaluative Flavor-Flavor Conditioning. ReferencesLearning and Motivation, 26(2), 141-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baeyens, F., Crombez, G., van den Bergh, O. & Eelen, P. (1988). Once in Contact Always in Contact - Evaluative Conditioning Is Resistant to Extinction. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 10(4), 179-199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baeyens, F. & De Houwer, J. (1995). Evaluative Conditioning Is a Qualitatively Distinct Form of Classical-Conditioning - Reply. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(7), 825-831.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baeyens, F., Eelen, P. & Crombez, G. (1995). Pavlovian Associations Are Forever - on Classical-Conditioning and Extinction. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9(2), 127-141.Google Scholar
  5. Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Crombez, G. & Vandenbergh, O. (1992). Human Evaluative Conditioning - Acquisition Trials, Presentation Schedule, Evaluative Style and Contingency Awareness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30(2), 133-142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baeyens, F., Eelen, P. & van den Bergh, O. (1990). Contingency Awareness in Evaluative Conditioning - a Case for Unaware Affective-Evaluative Learning. Cognition & Emotion, 4(1), 3-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., van den Bergh, O. & Crombez, G. (1990). Flavor-Flavor and Color-Flavor Conditioning in Humans. Learning and Motivation, 21(4), 434-455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baeyens, F., Hermans, D. & Eelen, P. (1993). The Role of CS-US Contingency in Human Evaluative Conditioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(8), 731-737.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davey, G.C.L. (1994). Defining the Important Theoretical Questions to Ask About Evaluative Conditioning - a Reply. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(3), 307-310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Houwer, J., Baeyens, F. & Field, A.P. (2005). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: Some current controversies and possible ways forward. Cognition and Emotion, 19(2), 161-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Houwer, J., Baeyens, F., Vansteenwegen, D. & Eelen, P. (2000). Evaluative conditioning in the picture-picture paradigm with random assignment of conditioned stimuli to unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Behavior Processes, 26(2), 237-242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 853-869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Diaz, E., Ruiz, G. & Baeyens, F. (2005). Resistance to extinction of human evaluative conditioning using a between-participants design. Cognition and Emotion, 19(2), 244-268.Google Scholar
  14. Field, A.P. (1997). Re-evaluating evaluative conditioning. University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Field, A.P. (2000a). Evaluative conditioning is Pavlovian conditioning: Issues of definition, measurement, and the theoretical importance of contingency awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(1), 41-49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Field, A.P. (2000b). I like it, but I'm not sure why: Can evaluative conditioning occur without conscious awareness? Consciousness and Cognition, 9(1), 13-36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Field, A.P. (2001). When all is still concealed: Are we closer to understanding the mechanisms underlying evaluative conditioning? Consciousness and Cognition, 10(4), 559-566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Field, A.P. (2005). Learning to Like (and dislike): Associative Learning of Preferences. In A. J. Wills (Ed.), New Directions in Human Associative Learning (pp. 221-252). Mahwah, New Jersey: LEA.Google Scholar
  19. Field, A.P. & Davey, G.C.L. (1997). Conceptual conditioning: Evidence for an artifactual account of evaluative learning. Learning and Motivation, 28(3), 446-464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Field, A.P. & Davey, G.C.L. (1998). Evaluative conditioning: Arti-fact or -fiction? A reply to Baeyens, de Houwer, Vansteenwegen, and Eelen (1998). Learning and Motivation, 29(4), 475-491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Field, A.P. & Davey, G.C.L. (1999). Reevaluating evaluative conditioning: A nonassociative explanation of conditioning effects in the visual evaluative conditioning paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Behavior Processes, 25(2), 211-224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Field, A.P. & Gillett, R. (2007). How to do a meta-analysis. Manuscript Under Review.Google Scholar
  23. Field, A.P. & Moore, A.C. (2005). Dissociating the effects of Attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 19(2), 217-243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fulcher, E.P., & Hammerl, M. (2001). When all is revealed: A dissociation between evaluative learning and contingency awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 10(4), 524-549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Havermans, R.C. & Jansen, A. (2007). Evaluative conditioning: a review and a model. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 63(2), 38-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hedges, L.V. & Vevea, J.L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (1997). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings. Florida: NIMH Center for Emotion and Attention (CSEA).Google Scholar
  28. Lascelles, K.R.R., Field, A.P. & Davey, G.C.L. (2003). Using foods as CSs and body shapes as UCSs: A putative role for associative learning in the development of eating disorders. Behavior Therapy, 34(2), 213-235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mackintosh, N.J. (1975). Theory of Attention - Variations in Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82(4), 276-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin, I. & Levey, A. (1994). The Evaluative Response - Primitive but Necessary. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(3), 301-305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearce, J.M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rescorla, R.A., & Wagner, A.R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and on reinforcement. In A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  33. Rozin, P., Wrzesniewski, A. & Byrnes, D. (1998). The elusiveness of evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 29(4), 397-415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shanks, D.R. & Dickinson, A. (1990). Contingency Awareness in Evaluative Conditioning - a Comment. Cognition & Emotion, 4(1), 19-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andy P. Field
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kristy R. R. Lascelles
    • 2
  • Kathryn J. Lester
    • 1
  • Chris Askew
    • 3
  • Graham C. L. Davey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
  3. 3.Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesKingston UniversityKingston upon ThamesJamaica

Personalised recommendations