Kind en adolescent

, 26:133 | Cite as


Over daders, slachtoffers, dader/slachtoffers en niet-betrokken leerlingen
  • René VeenstraEmail author
  • Siegwart Lindenberg
  • Albertine J. Oldehinkel
  • Andrea F de Winter
  • Frank C. Verhulst
  • Johan Ormel


Onderzoek naar pesten is grotendeels gebaseerd op univariate analyses en gegevens van één informant. Onderzoekers weten daardoor te weinig van de simultane effecten van verschillende onafhankelijke en afhankelijke variabelen en het onderzoek wordt mogelijk vertekend door de zogeheten ‘shared method variance’. Het databestand voor dit onderzoek was groot (n = 1065) en rijk genoeg om gebruik te maken van multivariate analyses en verschillende informanten. Sekse, agressiviteit, isolement en afwijzing bleken het sterkst gerelateerd aan pesten. Afwijkend van eerdere bevindingen was dat niet alleen slachtoffers en dader/slachtoffers maar ook daders afgewezen werden door klasgenoten en dat opvoedingskenmerken niet gerelateerd waren aan pesten.



  1. Borooah, V. K. (2001). Logit and probit. Ordered and multinomial models. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73-87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K. (2003). Perceptions of the frequency and importance of social support by students classified as victims, bullies, and bully/victims in an urban middle school. School Psychology Review, 32, 471-489.Google Scholar
  4. De Winter, A. F., Oldehinkel, A. J., Veenstra, R., Brunnekreef, J. A., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005). Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents. European Journal of Epidemiology. 20, 173-181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Doll, B., Song, S., & Siemers, E. (2004). Classroom ecologies that support or discourage bullying. In D. L. Espelage, & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 161-183). Mahwah, nj: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Adams, R. S. (2004). Empathy, caring, and bullying: Toward an under­standing of complex associations. In D. L. Espelage, & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 37-61). Mahwah, nj: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., & Cairns, B. D. (2004). Bullies and victims in rural African-American youth: Behavioral characteristics and social network placement. Unpublished work.Google Scholar
  8. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research, 25, 201-239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2004). Aggressive victims, passive victims, and bullies: Developmental continuity or developmental change? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 17-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Pasupathi, M. (2002). Winning friends and influencing peers: Strategies of peer influence in late childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 466-474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Davis Crump, A., Saylor, K., Yu, K. et al. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huisman, M. (2000). Imputation of missing item responses: Some simple techniques. Quality and Quantity, 34, 331-351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school. The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 105-124). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpela, A. (2000). Bullying at school - an indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 661-674.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36, 366-380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Klicpera, C., & Gasteiger Klicpera, B. (1996). Die Situation von ‘Tätern’ und ‘Opfern’ aggresiver Handlungen in der Schule. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 45, 2-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumpulainen, K., & Rasanen, E. (2000). Children involved in bullying at elementary school age: Their psychiatric symptoms and deviance in adolescence. An epidemiological sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1567-1577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Liao, T. F. (1994). Interpreting probability models. Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Markus, M. T., Lindhout, I. E., Boer, F., Hoogendijk, T. H. G., & Arrindell, W. A. (2003). Factors of perceived parental rearing styles: the embu-c examined in a sample of Dutch primary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 503-519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Masten, A. S., Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21, 523-533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nansel, T. R., Craig, W., Overpeck, M. D., Saluja, G., Ruan, W. J., & the Health Behavior in School-aged Children Bullying Analyses Working Group (2004). Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158, 730-736.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth - Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094-2100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Olweus, D. (1993a). Bullying at school. What we know and what we can do. Oxford/Cambridge, ma: Black­well.Google Scholar
  26. Olweus, D. (1993b). Victimization by peers: Antecedents and long-term outcomes. In K. H. Rubin, & J. B. Asendorpf (Eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 315-341). Hillsdale, nj: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216-224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384-400.Google Scholar
  30. Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4, 227-241.Google Scholar
  31. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children’s peer groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 181-192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072-1085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Buuren, S., Boshuizen, H. C., & Knook, D. L. (1999). Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 681-694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S. M., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005, in druk). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41. Google Scholar
  36. Wolke, D., Woods, S., Stanford, K., & Schulz, H. (2001). Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 673-696.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Veenstra
    • 1
    Email author
  • Siegwart Lindenberg
    • 1
  • Albertine J. Oldehinkel
    • 1
  • Andrea F de Winter
    • 1
  • Frank C. Verhulst
    • 1
  • Johan Ormel
    • 1
  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations