Skip to main content
Log in

Factors influencing the distribution of antibody in the immunoglobulin classes of the mouse

Fattori che influenzano nel topo la distribuzione degli anticorpi nelle varie classi di immunoglobuline

  • Review
  • Published:
La Ricerca in Clinica e in Laboratorio

Riassunto

Anticorpi verso l’HSA e 1a KLH sono stati dimostrati in tutte e cinque 1e classi immunoglo-buliniche di topolini Balb/c. È stato dimostrato che 1aB. pertussis è più efficace nello stimolare 1a produzione di anticorpi verso l’HSA che verso 1a KLH e che gli anticorpi IgGi e IgG2b sono stimolati più di quelli delle altre classi. È stato inoltre dimostrato che i topolini timectomizzati producono meno anticorpi dei topolini normali verso l’HSA e che 1a riduzione délia quantità totale di anticorpi è dovuta ad una riduzione degli anticorpi IgGi.

Summary

Antibody activity against HSA and KLH has been found in all five Immunoglobulin classes of Balb/c mice.B. pertussis was more effective in stimulating antibody production against HSA than against KLH and IgG1 and IgG2b antibody were effected more than the antibody present in the other classes. It has also been showed that thymectomised mice produced a significant lower level of antibody against HSA and the decrease in the total antibody was due to a decrease in IgG1 antibody.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong W. D., Diener E., Shellam G. R.: Antigen-Reactive Cells in Normal, Immunised and Tolerant Mice - J. exp. Med.129, 393, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benacerraf B., Ovary Z., Block K. J., Franklin E. C.: Properties of Guinea Pig 7S Antibodies. I. Electrophoretic Separation of Two Types of Guinea Pig 7S Antibodies - J. exp. Med.117, 937, 1963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Claman H. N., Chaperson E. A., Triplett R. F.: Thymus-Marrow Cell Combinations. Synergism in Antibody Production - Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)122, 1167, 1966.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coe J. E.: 7S 1 and 7S 2 Antibody Response in the Mouse. I. Influence of Strain, Antigen and Adjuvant - J. Immunol.96, 744, 1966.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fahey J. L., Wunderlich J., Mishell R.: The Immunoglobulins of Mice. II. Two Subclasses of 7S 2 Globulins: 2a and 2b Globulins - J. exp. Med.120, 243, 1964.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greaves M. F., Tursi A., Playfair J. H. L., Torrigiani G., Zamir R., Roitt I. M.: Immunosuppressive Potency and in Vitro Activity of Antilymphocytes Globulin - Lancet1, 68, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee J. M., Olitsky R. K.: Simple Method for Enhancing Development of Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis in Mice - Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)89, 203, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McDevitt H. O.: Genetic Control of Antibody Response. III. Qualitative and Quantitative Characterisation of the Antibody Response to (T.G.)-H-L in CBA and C 57 Mice - J. Immunol.100, 485, 1968.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchison N. A.: The Immunogenic Capacity of Antigen Taken up by Peritoneal Exudate Cells - Immunology16, 1, 1969.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sell S., Park A. B., Nordin A. A.: Immunoglobulin Classes of Antibody Forming Cells in Mice. I. Localised Haemolysis in Agar Plaque-Forming Cells Belonging to Five Immunoglobulin Classes - J. Immunol.105, 483, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shaw C. M., Alvord E. C. Jr.,Fahlberg W. J., Kies M. W.: Substitution for the Myco-bacteria in Freund’s Adjuvant in the Production of Experimental « Allergic » Encephalomyelitis on the Guinea Pig - J. Immunol.92, 28, 1964.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Taub R. N., Krantz A. R., Dresser D. W.: The Effect of Localised Infection of Adjuvant Material on the Draining Lymph Node. I. Histology - Immunology18, 171, 1970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Torrigiani G., Roitt I. M., Doniach D.: Quantitative Distribution of Human Thyroglobulin Autoantibodies in Different Immunoglobulin Classes - Clin. exp. Immunol.3, 621, 1968.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Torrigiani G.: In Press.

  15. Unanue E. R., Askonas B. A.: Two Functions of Macrophages and Their Role in the Immune Response - J. reticuloendoth. Soc.4, 440, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Warner N. L., Val N. M., Ovary Z.: Immunoglobulin Classes in Antibody Responses in Mice. I. Analysis by Biochemical Properties - Immunology14, 275, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  17. White R. G., Coons A. H., Connolly J. M.: Studies on Antibody Production; Role of Wax Fraction of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Adjuvant Emulsion on Production of Antibody to Egg Albumine - J. exp. Med.102, 83, 1955.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. White R. G., Jenkis G. C., Wilkinson P. C..: The Production of Skin-Sensitizing Antibody in the Guinea-Pig - Int. Arch. Allergy22, 156, 1963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wortis H. H., Dresser D. W., Anderson H. R.: Antibody Production Studied by Means of the Localized Haemolysis in Gel (LHG). Essay III. Mouse Cells Producing Five Different Classes of Antibody - Immunology93, 110, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torrigiani, G. Factors influencing the distribution of antibody in the immunoglobulin classes of the mouse. La Ricerca Clin. Lab. 1, 530–541 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03054475

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03054475

Key-words

Navigation