Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of domestication on seed packing cost in legumes

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The evolutionary shifts in the seed packing features of the plants during domestication were studied by comparing a set of domesticated legumes with the wild species. The domestication considerably reduced the packing cost of the seeds in terms of pod coat weight per unit weight of seeds. This reduction is a result of increased seed weight per pod and the average seed weight, probably at the cost of seed number per pod, while the podcoat weight per pod was maintained during domestication. Eventhough, the average seed weight increased by 8-fold from wild to domesticates, the increase in pod coat weight per seed was only 2-3-fold. It is possible to separate wild and domesticates into distinct clusters on the basis of their individual seed weight and packing costs. We discuss the evolutionary implications of these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker H G 1972 Seed weight in relation to environmental conditions in California;Ecology 53 997–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wet J M J and Harlan J R 1975 Weeds and domesticates: Evolution in the man-made habitat;Econ. Bot. 29 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry H S 1969 Origin of the common bean,Ph. Vulgaris;Econ. Bot. 23 55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan J R 1975Crops and man (Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America)

  • Harlan J R, de Wet J M J and Price E G 1973 Comparative evolution of cereals;Evolution 27 311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper J L 1977Population biology of plants (New York: Academic Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan L 1965 Archaeology and domestication in AmericanPhaseolous;Econ. Bot. 19 358–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall D L 1986 Effect of seed size on seedling success in three species ofSesbania (Fabaceae);Am. J. Bot. 73 457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morishima H, Hinata and Oka H I 1963 Comparisons of modes of evolution of cultivated forms from two wild rice speciesO. breviligulata andO. perennis;Evolution 17 170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primack R E 1987 Relationship among flowers, fruits and seeds,Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18 409–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury E J 1942The reproductive capacity of plants (London: Bell)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt J 1969 Evolution of AmericanPhaseolus beans under domestication; inThe domestication and exploitation of plants and animals (eds) P J Ucko and G W Dimbleby (London: Duckworth) pp 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt J 1976 Comparitive evolution of pulse crops;Euphytica 25 139–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smartt J 1978 The evolution of pulse crops;Econ. Bot. 32 185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins G L 1970 Adaptive radiation of reproductive characters in angiosperms. I Pollination mechanism;Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1 307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uma Shaanker R and Ganeshaiah K N 1980 Evolutionary significance of pollen to ovule ratio a study in some pulse crops;Curr. Sci. 48 244–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Uma Shaanker R and Ganeshaiah K N 1982 Evolutionary significance of the economy in the pollen grian to ovule ratio in the process of crop domestication;Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. B 48 354–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells P V 1976 A climax index for broad leaf forest. An n-dimensional ecomorphological model of succession;Cent. Hardwood Conf. Proc. 1 131–176

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, P.G., Vinayak, K. Effect of domestication on seed packing cost in legumes. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 100, 337–342 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053457

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053457

Keywords

Navigation