Abstract
In view of the sun and shade adaptations of plants to semi-arid climatic conditions investigations were undertaken withErythrina variegata Lam. The studies revealed that shading decreased root and shoot growth, leaf density, leaf area, specific leaf weight, relative growth rate and relative leaf growth rate. Consequently the dry biomass accumulation was adversely affected in shade grown plants. Synthesis of chlorophyll including Chla and Chlb were promoted in the shade grown plants, so as to trap the available sun energy efficiently under shade condition. The Chla/b ratio was decreased in shade grown plants as compared to sun plants. Total soluble protein was reduced, which could be related to the lowered net photosynthetic rate. Thein vivo nitrate reductase (EC 1·6·6·1) activity, an indicator of nitrate utilization was also significantly reduced. Both reduced enzyme activity and net photosynthetic rate could be attributed to the lowered whole plant biomass productivity. The increased stomatal diffusive resistance in shade plants, is associated with the low rate of transpiration. It is concluded that the biomass productivity ofErythrina variegata Lam. under shade condition is drastically reduced by low irradiance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnon D I 1949 Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenol oxidase inBetula vulgaris;Plant Physiol. 24 1–15
Bjorkman O and Ludlow M 1972 Characterization of the light, climate on the floor of a Queensland rain-forest;Carnegie Inst. Washington Yearb 71 85–94
Bjorkman O, Ludlow M and Morrow P 1972 Photosynthetic performance of two rain-forest species in their native habitat and analysis of their gas exchange;Carnegie Inst. Washington Yearb. 77 94–102
Bjorkman O, Troughton J and Nobs M A 1973 Photosynthesis in relation to leaf structure;Brook Haven Symp. Biol. 25 206–226
Bjorkman O 1981 Responses to different quantum flux densities; inEncyclopedia of plant physiology (New series) (eds) A Pirson and M H Zimmermann (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) Vol 1, pp 57–107
Boardman N K 1977 Comparing photosynthesis of sun and shade plants;Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28 355–377
Charles-Edwards D A and Ludwig L J 1975 The basis of expression of leaf photosynthesis activities; inEnvironmental and biological control of photosynthesis (ed.) R Marcelle (Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/W Junk Pub.) pp 36–51
Clarkson D T 1986 Regulation of the absorption and release of nitrate by plant cells: A review of current ideas and methodology; inFundamental, ecological and agricultural aspects of nitrogen metabolism in higher plants (eds) H Lambers, J J Neeteson and I Stulen (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Pub.) pp 3–27
Curtis W F and Kincaid D T 1984 Leaf conductance responses ofViola species from sun and shade habitats;Can. J. Bot. 62 1273–1278
Fails B S, Lewis A and Bardew J A 1982 Anatomy and morphology of sun and shade grownFicus benjamina;J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107 754–757
Fetcher N, Strain B R and Oberbauer S F 1983 Effects of light regime on the growth, leaf morphology and water relations of seedlings of two species of tropical trees;Oecologia 58 314–319
Fischer R A 1921 Some remarks on the methods formulated in a recent article on the quantitative analysis of plant growth;Ann. Appl. Biol. 7 367–372
Handique A C and Manivel L 1987 Effect of shade, leaf position and leaf age on stomatal diffusion resistance in tea (Camellia sinensis L.);Indian J. Plant Physiol. 30 279–283
Harvey G W 1980 Seasonal alternation of photosynthetic unit size in three herb layer components of a deciduous forest community;Am. J. Bot. 67 293–299
Isebrands J G and Nelson N D 1982 Crown architecture of short rotation, intensitively cultured populus. II. Branch morphology and distribution of leaves within the crown of Populus ‘Tristis’ as related to biomass production;Can. J. For. Res. 12 853–864
Jaworski E G 1971 Nitrate reductase assay in intact plant tissues;Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 43 1274–1279
Kappel F and Flore J A 1983 Effect of shade on photosynthesis specific leaf weight, leaf chlorophyll content and morphology of young peach trees;J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108 541–544
Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A L and Randall R J 1951 Protein measurement with the folinphenol reagent;J. Biol. Chem. 193 265–275
Lewandowska M and Jarvis P G 1977 Changes in chlorophyll and carotenoid content specific leaf area and dry weight fraction in Sitka spruce in response to shading and season;New Phytol. 79 247–256
Marini R R and Marini M CH 1983 Seasonal changes in specific leaf weight, net photosynthesis and chlorophyll content of peach leaves as affected by light penetration and canopy position;J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108 600–605
Masarovicova E and Elias P 1981 Chlorophyll content in leaves in an oak-hornbeam forest. 2. Shrub species;Photosynthetica 15 16–20
Masarovicova E and Minarcic P 1984 Photosynthetic response and adaptation ofFagus sylvatica L. trees to light conditions. 1. Growth, shoots and trees;Biologia (Bratislava) 39 867–876
Masarovicova E and Minarcic P 1985 Photosynthetic response and adaptation ofFagus sylvatica L. trees to light conditions. 2. Leaf chlorophyll contents, leaf dry matter, specific leaf area and mass, stomatal density;Biologia (Bratislava) 40 473–481
McClendoh J H and McMillen G G 1982 The control of leaf morphology and the tolerance to shade by woody plants;Bot. Gaz. 143 79–83
Mygren M and Kallomaki 1983 Effect of shading on leaf structure and photosynthesis in young birchesBetula pendula Roth. andBetula pubescens Ehrh;For. Ecol. Manag. 7 119–132
Paliwal K, Muthuchelian K, Krishna Rao R and Gnanam A 1986 Responses of a woody legume tree species to low light stress; inNational Symposium on physiological, biochemical and genetic aspects of crop plants in relation to environmental stress (eds) Randhir Singh, I S Sheoran and M R Saharan (Hissar: Haryana Agricultural University) pp 147–149
Pearce R B, Brown R H and Blaser R E 1968 Photosynthesis of alfalfa leaves as influenced by age and environment;Crop Sci. 8 677–680
Radford P J 1967 Growth analysis formulae, their use and abuse;Crop Sci. 7 171–175
Sionit N, Hellomers H and Strain B R 1982 Interactions of atmospheric CO2 enrichment and irradiance on plant growth;Agron. J. 74 721–725
Solbrig O T 1981 Energy information and plant evolution; in physiological ecology:An evolutionary approach to resource use (eds) P Calow and C Townsend (London: Blackwell) pp 274–295
Spiertz J H J 1982 Physiological and environmental determinants of potential crop productivity; inOptimizing yields. The role of fertilizers (Proceedings of the 12th Congress Inst. Pot. Institute. Bern) pp 27–46
Taylor R J and Pearcy R W 1976 Seasonal patterns of the CO2 exchange characteristics of understory plants from a deciduous forest;Can. J. Bot. 154 1094–1103
Usuda H, Ku S B M and Edwards G E 1985 Influence of light intensity during growth on photosynthesis and activity of several key photosynthetic enzymes in a C4 plant (Zea mays);Physiol. Plant 63 65–67
Wallace L L and Dunn E L 1980 Comparative photosynthesis of three gap phase successional tree species;Oecologia 45 331–340
Williams R F 1946 The physiology of plant growth with special reference to the concept of net assimilation rate;Ann. Bot. 10 41–72
Young D R and Smith W K 1980 Influence of sunlight on photosynthesis, water relations and leaf structure in the understory species (Arnica cordifolia);Ecology 61 1380–1390
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dedicated to late Prof. S Krishnaswamy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muthuchelian, K., Paliwal, K. & Gnanam, A. Influence of shading on net photosynthetic and transpiration rates, stomatal diffusive resistance, nitrate reductase and biomass productivity of a woody legume tree species (Erythrina variegata Lam.). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 99, 539–546 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053423
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053423