Abstract
Net photosynthesis rate, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase protein and total chlorophyll content in leaves which subtend the pods vis-a-vis the pattern of pod, podwall and seed growth were analyzed in chick pea. Three sets of plants namely control, deflowered and depodded were maintained. Accompanying the initiation of pod development in control plants, there was a decline in these photosynthetic characteristics in leaves of control as well as deflowered plants. The senescence rate was higher in control plants compared to plants from which flowers or pods had been removed. The early pod growth which was mainly constituted by podwall growth, was accompanied by a higher decline in leaf net photosynthesis rate. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase protein decreased predominantly at the later stage of pod growth, which was mainly constituted by higher seed growth. Loss of chlorophyll was also higher at later stages of pod growth. It is suggested that both nutrient remobilization and hormonal action are probably involved during monocarpic senescence in chick pea.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnon D I 1949 Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: Polyphenoloxidase inBeta vulgaris;Plant Physiol. 24 1–15
Bjorkman O 1968 Carboxydismutase activity in shade adapted and sun adapted species of higher plants;Physiol. Plant. 21 1–10
Davis B J 1964 Disc electrophoresis. II. Method and application of human serum proteins;Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 121 404–427
Friedrich J W and Huffaker R C 1980 Photosynthesis leaf resistance and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase degradation in senescing barley leaves;Plant Physiol. 65 1103–1107
Grover Anil, Koundal K R and Sinha S K 1985 Senescence of attached leaves: Regulation by developing pods;Physiol. Plant. 63 87–92
Hardy R W F, Havelka U D and Quebedeaux B 1978 The opportunity for and significance of alteration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activities; inPhotosynthetic Crop Assimilation (eds) H W Siegelmann and G Hind (New York: Plenum Press) pp 165–178
Khanna-Chopra Renu and Sinha S K 1980 Allantoin content and nitrogen accumulation in relation to drymatter accumulation and yield inCajanus cajan cv. Prabhat;International Workshop on Pigeon peas ICRISAT, India,2 15–19
Leopold A C, Niedergang-Kamien E and Jamick J 1959 Experimental modification of plant senescence;Plant Physiol. 34 570–573
Lindoo S and Nooden L D 1976 The interaction of fruit development and leaf senescence in ‘Anoka’ soyabeans;Bot. Gaz. 137 218–232
Lowry O H, Rosenbrough N J, Farr A L and Randall H J 1951 Protein measurement with the folin_— phenol reagent;J. Biol. Chem. 193 265–275
Malik N S A and Berrie A M A 1975 Correlative effects of fruits and leaves in senescence of pea plants;Planta 124 169–175
Marco G D, Grego S and Tricoli D 1979 RuBP carboxylase-oxygenase in field grown wheat;J. Exp. Bot. 30 951–961
Nooden L D, Rupp D C and Derman B C 1978 Separation of seed development from monocarpic senescence in soyabeans;Nature (London) 271 354–357
Sesay A and Shibles R 1980 Mineral depletion and leaf senescence in soybeans as influenced by foliar nutrient application during seed filling;Ann. Bot. 45 47–55
Sinclair T R and deWit C T 1976 Analysis of the carbon and nitrogen limitations to soyabean yield;Agron. J. 68 319–324
Sinha S K 1977Food legumes: distribution adaptability and biology of yield; FAO Plant Production and Protection, Paper 3, Rome
Sinha S K, Khanna-Chopra R, Chatterjee S P and Abrol Y P 1978 Composition of bleeding sap inVigna qureus;Physiol. Plant. 42 45–48
Thomas H and Stoddart J L 1980 Leaf senescence;Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31 83–111
Williams L E and Kennedy R A 1978 Photosynthetic carbon metabolism during leaf ontogeny inZea mays L. Enzyme studies;Planta 132 269–274
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grover, A., Sinha, S.K. Relationship of developing pods with photosynthetic characteristics of leaves in chick pea. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 95, 333–340 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053244
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053244