Abstract
In the present study 35 patients with preforated and 15 cases with intact ear drums, were studied and eustachian tube function was assessed by Saccharine test. Bortnick-Miller test, and manual impedance audiometry. The merits and demerits of one over the other were evaluated. It was observed thal more than one test when employed provides better information as every test has its own advantages and limitations
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bortnick, E (1966): A simple apparatus to measure eustachian tubal function.Archives of Otolaryngology (Chicago).83: 38
Elbrond, O. and Larsen, E. (1976): Mucociliary function of eustachian tube.Archives of Otolaryngology.102: 539.
Flisberg, K. Ingelstedt, S. & Ortengren, (1963): Controlled “ear aspiration” of air-A “physiological” test of the tubal function.Acta Otolaryngologica-Suppl. 182: 35.
Hartman, A (1879): Quoted by Kacker et al A: “Eustachian Tubal Function in health and diseases”.Indian Journal of Otolaryngology 23: 163.
Kacker, S. K., Sinha, A and Dutta, N.N. (1971): Eustachian Tubal Function in health and disease.Indian Journal of Otolaryngology 23: 163.
Metz, O (1953): Influence of the patulous eustachian tube on the acoustic impedance of the ear.Acta Otolaryngologica (Suppl. 109)43: 105.
Miller, G.F. (1965): Eustachian tube function in normal and diseased ears.Archives of Otolaryngology.81: 41.
Perlman, H. B. (1960): Quoted by Kacker et al.Indian Journal of Otolaryngology 23: 163, 1971
Thomsen K.A. (1958): Investigations on Tubal Function.Acta Otolaryngologica. Suppl. 140: 269.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, S.C., Gupta, S.C. & Singh, A.P. Efficacy of various methods in evaluation of eustachian tube function. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 45, 188–190 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03052479
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03052479