Skip to main content
Log in

The replication of an experiment

Part I. Identical samples from a binomial population

  • Published:
Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Section A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The importance of replicating an experiment is shown by the consideration of the following problem:—To find out the nature of the coins in a set of 12 from merely the results of throws. The case discussed is the simplest in which each throw is assumed to have given the same result, namely 4 heads and 8 tails. It is shown that, in general, each throw increases, but never decreases, the accuracy of our result. It is also seen that after 11 experiments (throws) our knowledge of the set becomes complete and thus further experiments become unnecessary when the limit for random chance assumed by us is 5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. R. Campbell,Proc. Phys. Soc., London, 1935,47, 207–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harold Jeffreys,Phil. Mag., Seventh series,22, 146, 337–89.

  3. S. R. Savur,Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1937,5, 222–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karl Pearson,Tables of the Incomplete β-Function.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savur, S.R. The replication of an experiment. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 6, 174–178 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03051500

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03051500

Keywords

Navigation