Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contributions to the bionomics, anatomy, reproduction and development of the Indian house-geckoHemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel

Part V. The urinogenital system

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Alverdes, K. “Die Samenableitungswege der Eidechsen,”Zs. Mikros. Anat. Forsch., Leipzig, 1926,6, 420–42, 11 figs.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ambrus Ábrahám “Über die Schenkeldrüsen der Archæo- und Neolacerten,”Studio zoologica, I, Fasc. 3. -bol, 1930, 204–52.

  3. Boulenger, G. A. “Catalogue of the Lizards in the British Museum,” Second Edition, 1885, 1.

  4. - “Reptilia and Batrachia,”Fauna Brit. India, 1890.

  5. Braun “The primitive kidney and sexual organs inAnguis fragilis,”Arb. Inst. Würzb., 1878, 138–45.

  6. Braun, M. “Das Urogenitalsystem der einheimischen Reptilien,”Arbeiten aus dem zool. Inst. in Würzb., 1877, Bd. IV.

  7. Braun “The primitive kidney and the sexual organs ofLacerta agilis,”Arb. Inst. Würzb., 1878,4, 132–45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks, B. “The anatomy of the internal urogenital organs of certain North American Lizards,”Cont. Zool. Lab. Univ. Tex., 1906,69, (Trans. Texas Acad. Sci.,8, 23–38).

  9. Brongersma, L. D. “Contributions to the Indo-Australian Herpetology,” Leyden, 1934.

  10. Coe, W. R. and Kunkel, B. W. “The Reproductive organs of the limbless lizard, Anniella,”Amer. Natural, 1904,38, 487–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohn, L. “Die Schenkeldrüsen desCnemidophorus lemniscatus, Daud.,”Zool. Anz., 1904,27, 185–92.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cope, E. D. “On the hemipenes of the Sauria,”P. Ac. Philadelphia, 1896.

  13. Crowell, P. S. “The ciliation of the oviducts of reptiles,”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 1932,18, (5), 372–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deraniyagala, P. E. P. “The Gekkonoideæ of Ceylon,”Ceylon J. Sci., Sect. B. (Spolia Zeylanica), 1932,16, 291–310.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dornisco, G. T. “Sur l’ existence d’ un segment sexual dans 1e tube urinifæ du rein des Lacerta impuberes,” Paris,C.R. Soc. biol., 1925,93, 38, 1620–21.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duméril, A. M. “Erpétologie Générale au Histoire Naturelle complête des Reptiles,” Paris, 1834,1, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dutta, S. K. “Notes on a case of unilateral atrophy of testis in the common wall Gecko (Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel),”Proc. Acad. Sci., U.P., 1934–35,4, pt. 3, 279–82.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Félzet, J. “Recherches sur le Glandes Fémorales deLacerta muralis,”Jour. d’Anat. Physiol., 1911,47, 333–70.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fleck, Oskar “Die Entwicklungsgeschichte des Urogenitalsystems beim Gecko (Platydactylus annul.),”Anat Hefte. Wiesbaden Abt., 1910, 1,41, 435–93.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Forbes, T. R. “Observations on the urinogenital anatomy of the adult male lizard,Sceloporus, and on the action of implanted pellets of testosterone and of estrone,”J. Morph., Philadelphia, 1941,68, 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frankenberger, Z. “Sur les ovules rudimentaires dans les testiculesde Lacerta vivipara,”Prague, Jacq. Bul. Internat. Acad., 1923,23, 144–51.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frederici, N. “Sull’ apparechio genito-urinario delGongylus ocellatus, Napoli,”Forsk. Boll. Soc., 1897,10, 179–92.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gadow, Hans “Remarks on the cloaca and copulatory organs of the Amniota,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, B, 1887,178, 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gierberg, H. “Untersuchungen über Physiologie und Histologie des Eileiters der Reptilien und Vögel, nebst einem Beitrag zur Fasergenese,”Zs. Wiss. Zool. Leipzig, 1922,120, 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hädge, H. B. “Das Urogenital system vonUroplatus fimbriatus,”Wiss. Ergebn. 1917,3, 487–518.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Heidenhain, R. “Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Nieren. Mikrosk. Anatomie,”Zeitschrift f. microsk.,1874,Bd. X.

  27. Helt, J. “Das Corpus luteum der zanneidechse (Lacerta agilis)” Leipzig,Zs. mikr. anat. Forsch., (Abt. 2 ofMorph. Jahrb), 1924,1, 41–84.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Herlant, M. “Sur 1e dimorphisme sexual 1e rein des Lacertiliens” Paris.C.R. Soc. Biol., 1931,107, 21, 890–91.

    Google Scholar 

  29. — “Recherches histologiques et expérimentales sur les variations cyclique du Testicule et des caracteres sexuals secondaires chez les Reptiles,” Liege,Arch. Biol., 1933,44, 347–468.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hill, J. P. “Note on the presence of vestigial Müllerian Ducts in a full grown male lizard, (Amphibolurus muricatus),”P. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, (2), 1894,8, 325–26.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hoffmann, C. K. “Zur Entwicklungsgeschiche der Urogenitalorgane bei des Reptilien,”Z. Wiss. Zool., 1889,48, 266–300.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Howes, G. B. “On the vestigial structures of the Reproductive Apparatus in the male of the Green Lizard,”J. Anat. Phys., 1887,21, 185–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hrabowski, H. “Das Dotterorgan der Eidechsen,”Zs. wiss. Zool. Leipzig, 1926,128, 305–82.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Inouye, Ch. “Über den Lappenbau der Niere. Eine phylogenetische Studie (Reptiles),”Anat. Anz. Jena, 1931,72, 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobi, L. “Ovoviviparie bei einheimischen Eidechsen. Vergleichende Untersuchungen an den Eiern und am Ovidukt vonLacerta agilis, Lacerta vivipara and Anguis fragilis,” Leipzig,Z. Wiss. Zool., 1936,148, 401–64.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kampen, P. N. van “On the phytogeny of the hair of mammals,”Proc. Koninklizke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, 1919,22, No. 2, 140–44.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Leydig, F. “Die in Deutschland lebenden Arten der Saurier,” Tübingen 1872.

  38. Mahendra, B. C. “On the peculiar Apertures in the Vertebral Centra ofHemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel,”Curr. Sci., July 1935 (a).

  39. - “The presence of Uncinate Processes on the Ribs of a Lacertilian,”Ibid.,4, No. 1, July 1935 (b).

  40. - “Sexual Dimorphism in the Indian House-Gecko,Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel,”Ibid.,4, No. 3. Sept. 1935 (c).

  41. - “Geckos and Superstition,”J. Bom. Nat. His. Soc., April 1936 (a).

  42. - “Contributions to the Bionomics, Anatomy, Reproduction and Development of the Indian House-Gecko,Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel, Part I”,Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1936 (b),4.

  43. - “Contributions to the Bionomics, Anatomy, Reproduction and Development of the Indian House-Gecko,Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel, Part II. The Problem of Locomotion,”Ibid., 1941,13.

  44. - “Contributions to the Bionomics, Anatomy, Reproduction and Development of the Indian House-Gecko,Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel, Part III. The Heart and the Venous System,”Ibid., 1942,15.

  45. - “Contributions to the Bionomics, Anatomy, Reproduction and Development of the Indian House-Gecko,Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel, Part IV. The Respiratory and Vocal Organs,”Ibid., 1947,25.

  46. - “The Skull of the Indian House-Gecko,Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel,”Proc. Zool. Soc., Bengal, March 1949.

  47. - “The Osteology of the Indian House-Gecko,Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel,”Ibid., March 1950. 47. Maurer, F. “Die Epidermis und ihre Abkommlinge,” Leipzig, 1895.

  48. McCann, C. “The Hemipenis in Reptiles,”J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 1946,46, 2, 348–73.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Meissner, C. F. “Die Amphiborum Quorandum Papillis Glandulisque Femoralibus,” Basel, 1832.

  50. Möller Friedrich, V. “Urogenitalverbindung beiEmys lutaria undLacerta agilis,” Lipzig,Nachtrag. Zool. Anz., 1909,34, 769–70.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Morgera. A. “La relazione tra il testicolo ed il deferente de aleuni Rettili,” Napoli,Boll. Soc., 1904,18, 114–28.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mulack, D. De M. “A comparative study of the Urinogenital systems of an oviparous and 2 ovoviviparous species of Lizard genusSceloporus,” Utah,Bull. Univ. Biol. Soc., 1946,9, 7, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Noble, G. K. “The bony structure and phyletic relations ofSphœrodactylus and allied lacertilian genera, with the description of a new genus,”Amer. Mus. Nov., 1921,4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  54. —, and Bradley, H. T. “The mating behaviour of Lizards; its bearing on the theory of sexual selection,”Ann. New York Ac. Sci., 1933,35, 26–100.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Otth “Tiedemanns Zeitschrift für Physiologie,” Bd. V, Heidelberg and Leipzig, 1833.

  56. Pesce, G. “Contribute alla conoscenza del testicolo nei rettili,” Genova,Boll. Mus. Zool. Anat. Comp., 1935,15, No. 86, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Regamcy, J. “Les differences sexuelles du cloaque chez le lizardLacerta agilis Linne,”Bull. Soc. vaud. Sci. nat., 1934,58, 234, 185–86.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Schæfer, Fritz. “Über die Schenkeldrüsen der Eidechsen,” Berlin, 1902.

  59. Schlegel, H. “Les Sauriens,”Fauna Japonica, Reptilia, 1838, 97–104.

  60. Schmidt, W. J. “Studien am Integument der Reptilien. I. Die Haut der Geck-oniden,”Zeitschr Wiss. Zool., 1912,101, Cl., 139–258.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Smith, M. A. “Remarks on some old World Geckoes,”Rec. Ind. Mus., 1933,35, 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  62. -, “Reptilia and Amphibia: Sauria,”Fauna Brit. India, 1935.

  63. Schoof, F. “Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Urogenitalsystems der Saurier,”Zool. Anz. XI. Pp. 189–90 andArch. f. Nat. Liv., 1888, Pp. 62–80, pl. iii.

  64. Tellyesniczkys, K. “Über den Bau des Eidechsenhodens,”Math. naturn. Ber. Ungarn, 1897,13, 303–342.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tölg, G. “Beiträge zur Kenntniss drüsenartiger Epidermoidalorgane der Eidechsen,”Arbeiten Zoolog. Inst. Wien, 1905,15, 119–154.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Unterhössel, P. “Morphologische Studien über Kloake und Phallus der Amnioten: Die Eisechsen und Schlangen,”Morph. Jahrb., 1902,30, 541–581.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Van den Broek, A. J. P. “Gonaden und Ausführungsgänge,”Bolk, Göppert, Kallius and Lubosch’sHandb. d. vergl. Anat. d. Wirbelt. 1932, 6.

  68. -, “Harnorgane. I. Allgemeine Morphologie der Harnorgane. II. Besondere Morphologie der Harnorgane der Wirbeltiere. III. Harnblase,”Ebenda, 1938,5.

  69. Van der Merwe, N. J. “Die Kloake en die paringsorgane van die pootlose akkadis.Acontias meleagris,”Tydskr. Wet. Kuns. Blosmfontein N.R., 1944,52, 146–159.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Vialli, M. and Giovanni, C. “Sulla presenza di cellule enterocromaffini nell apparato urogenitale diLacerta muralis,” Jena,Anat. Anz., 1939,88, 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wagler, J. “Naturliches System der Amphibien,” 1830.

  72. Wellborn, V. “Vergleichende osteologische Untersuchungen an Geckoniden, Eublephariden und Uroplatiden,”Sitz. Ber. Ges. Natf. Fr., 1933, 126–199.

  73. Wiedershem, R. “Zur Anatomie und Physiologie desPhylodactylus europœus mit besonderer Brucksichtigung des Aqueductus vestibuli der Ascalaboten in Allgemeinen. Zugleich als. zweiter Beitrag zur Inselfauna des Mittelmeeres”,Morph. Jahrb., 1876,1, 495–534.

    Google Scholar 

  74. -, “Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbeltiere,” Jena, 1909.

  75. Wöpke, K. “Die Kloake und die Begattungsorgane der männlichen Zanneidechse (Lecerta agilis, L.).”Jena. Z. Naturw., 193165 2, 275–318.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Zarnik, Boris “Vergleichende Studien über den Bau der Niere von Echidna und der Reptilienniere,”Jenaische Zs. Natw., 1910,46, 113–224. 0

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Agra College, Agra

    Bebni Charan Mahendra

Authors
  1. Bebni Charan Mahendra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahendra, B.C. Contributions to the bionomics, anatomy, reproduction and development of the Indian house-geckoHemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 38, 215–230 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050619

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050619

Keywords

Search

Navigation