Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of growing cotton in rotation with different crops on structure of black cotton soil

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Summary

Results of an investigation carried out to study the effect of growing cotton in rotation with juar and groundnut on the structure of black cotton soil are presented and discussed.

The rotations studied were:—

  1. (a)

    Cotton grown continuously year after year;

  2. (b)

    Cotton and juar grown in alternate years; and

  3. (c)

    Cotton-juar-groundnut in three course rotation.

Determinations made for evaluation of structure and the ranges of values obtained were:—

No significant differences in the structural condition of the soil were observed in plots under the three different rotations, both in 0–6″ and 6–12″ layers.

The lower 6–12″ layer did not show any structural difference from the surface 0–6″ layer.

None of the standing crops of the year,i.e., cotton, juar and groundnut showed any pronounced effect on the structure of the soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basu, J. K. and Kibe, M. M.Curr. Sci., 1946,15, 252.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —— and Sirur, S. S...Ind. Jour. Agri. Sci., 1943,13 (1), 66–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bavel, C. M. H. and Van Schaller, F. W.Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1950,15, 399–400.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botten, E. F. and Webbin, L. R.Sci. Agri., 1952,32, 555–58.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bouyoucous, G. I...Soil Sci., 1935,40, 481–85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cole, R. C...Hilgardia, 1939,12, 429–72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doirenko .. As quoted by Baver, L. D.,Soil Phys., 1948, 181.

  8. Elson, J...Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1944,8, 87–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. —————..Soil Sci., 1940,50, 339–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fireman, M... Ibid., 1944,58, 337–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gish, R. E. and Browning, G. M.Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1949,13, 51–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heltzer, F. J...Trans. 1st Com. Int. Soc. Soil Sci., 1934,A 2, 73–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston, J. R., Browning, G. M. and Russell, M. B.Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1943,7, 105–07.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kibe, M. M. and Basu, J. K.Jour. Univeristy Poona,1 (2), 2–13.

  15. Lutz, J. F. ..Proc. Assoc. S. Agri. Workers, 1941 (90);C.A., 35 (7915).

  16. Myers, H. E. and Myers, H. G.Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron., 1944,36, 965–69.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson, W. L. and Baver, L. D.Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1940,5, 69–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Puri, A. N. ..Mem. Dept. Agr. Chem. Series, 1930, 11.

  19. Rostovzeva, O. S. and Avaeva, M. I. As quoted by Baver, L. D.,Soil Phys., 1948, 186.

  20. Uhland, R. E. and O’Neal, A. M.Soil Permeability Determinations for Use in Soil and Water Conservation, 1951, U.S. Dept. Agri.

  21. Uhland, R. E. ..Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1949,14.

  22. Williams, W. R. .. As quoted by Baver L. D.,Soil Phys., 1948, 185.

  23. Wilson, H. A., Roger Gish, and Browing, G. M.Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1947,12, 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Woodruff .. As quoted by Baver, L. D.,Soil Phys., 1948, 187.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deshpande, T.L., Ballal, D.K. & Kalamkar, R.J. Effect of growing cotton in rotation with different crops on structure of black cotton soil. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 41, 251–268 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050484

Keywords

Navigation