Skip to main content
Log in

Studies in the Indian aquatic fungi

II. On the occurrence of two species of ancylistes in closterium

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature

  1. Beck, G. R. “Ancylistes Pfeifferi n. sp.,”Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien., 1896,46, 232–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. — “Ancylistes Pfeifferi n. sp.,”Bot. Centr., 1897,69, 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berdan, Helen “Revision of the genus Ancylistes,”Mycologia, 1938,30, 396–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borzi, A.Rhizomyxa, nuovo Ficomyceto., Messina. 1889.

  5. Couch, J. N. “A new species of Ancylistes on a saccoderm desmis,”Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., 1949,65, 131–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dangeard “Recherches histologiques sur les champignonsLe Botaniste, 1890-91b,2, 63–149.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Das-Gupta, S. N. and John, Rachel (Miss) “Studies in the Indian Aquatic Fungi, I. Some water moulds of Lucknow,”Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1953,38, 165–70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer, A. “Phycomycetes, Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. Rabenhorst,”Kryptogamen-Fl., Leipzig, 1892,1 (4), 1–490.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fritsch, A. “Über Parasiten bei Crustacean und Radertieren der Süzzen Gewässer.”Bull. Int. II. Acad. Sci., Prag, 1895,

  10. Karting, S. “Hyphochytrium catenoides,”Am. Jour. Bot., 1939,26, 518.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Minden “Chytridineæ, Ancylistineæ, Monoblepharidineæ, Saprolegnineæ,”Kryptogamen Fl, Mark Brandenburg, 1915, Pt. 2, 193–352, 1911, Pt. 3, 453–496, 1911, Pt. 4, 497–608, 1912, Pt. 5, 609–630, 1915.

  12. Pfitzer, E. “Ancylistes closterii, ein neuer Algen parasit, aus der Ordnung der Phycomyceten.” Monatsberichte der Konig.Akad. des, Wiss., Berlin, 1872, 379–98.

  13. Schenk, A.Uber das Vorkommencontractiler zellen im Pflanzenreiche, 1858, p. 10, Wurzburg.

  14. Schenk, A. “Algologische Mittheilungen.”Verhandl. Phys. Med. Gesell, Wurzburg, A. F., 1859,9, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  15. — “Achlyogeton, eine neue Gattung der Mycophyceæ,”Bot. Zeitung, 1859,17, 398–400.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schroter, J. “Ancylistineæ, Engler & Prantl,”Nat. Pflanzf., 1893,1, 88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skvortzow, B. W. “Zur Kenntnis der Phycomyceten aus der Nordmandschurei,”China Arch. Protistenk., 1925,51, 428–33.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sparrow, F. K., Jr. “A classification of Aquatic Phycomycetes,”Mycologia, 1942,34, 113–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zopf, W. “Über einem neuen parasitischen Phycomyceten aus der Abteilung der Oosporeen,”Verh. des. Bot. Vereins der Provinz, Brandenburg. 1878.

  20. - “Zur Kenntnis der Phycomyceten I. Zur Morphologie und Biologie der Ancylistineæ und Chytridiaceæ”Nova. Acta Acad. Leop., 1884,47.

  21. - “Über einige niedere algenpilze.”Abhandl. der naturf. Gesellschaft. z. Halle, 1887,17.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. S. N. Das Gupta,f.a.sc.

Contribution from the Department of Botany, Lucknow University New Series, No. 11.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

John, R. Studies in the Indian aquatic fungi. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 41, 86–95 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050329

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050329

Keywords

Navigation