Summary
The influence of 10 hour short-day photoperiod (8–00 a.m. to 6–00 p.m.) has been studied on four late-winter varieties of rice, C. No. 3 (a selection from Kajal Champa of Cuttack District), S.R. 26 B (a selection from Kalambank of Puri District), F.R. 13 A and F.R. 43 B (both flood-resistant varieties) of Orissa. Out of these four varieties, C. No. 3, S.R. 26 B and F.R. 13 A react to short-day photoperiod likewise and the other variety F.R. 43 B behaves differently. Short days for 3 weeks during the seed-bed stage bring about a delaying effect in ear emergence in the above stated three varieties. As the duration of short-day treatment increases to 4, 5, and 6 weeks in the seed bed, there is more and more delay in the time of ear emergence. The interesting point is that when the short-day phctoperiod has been given to the seedlings for 6 weeks and then continued after transplantation till ear emergence, a reverse effect, namely, a marked earliness in ear emergence is noted. Variety F.R. 43 B has behaved a little differently. In the prolonged short-day treatment set, 85% of the plants have shown an average earliness of 35 days in ear emergence, while the rest 15% have shown an earliness of 68 days in ear emergence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Austin, J. P. “Some effects of the photoperiod on development ofImpatiens balsamea,”Pl. Phys., 1935,10, 545–52.
Garner, W. W. and Allard, H. A. “Further studies in photoperiodism. The response of the plant to relative length of day and night,”Jour. Agr. Res., 1923,23, 871–920.
Misra, G. “Effect of photoperiod on the flowering time of two late varieties of paddy,”Curr. Sci., 1950,19, 126–27.
Murneek, A. E. “A separation of certain types of response of plants to photoperiod,”Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 1936,34, 507–09.
- “Biochemical studies of photoperiodism in plants,”Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull., 1937, No.268, 84 pp.
Purvis, O. N. and Gregory, F. G. “Studies in vernalisation of cereals, I. A comparative study of vernalisation of winter rye by low temperature and by short days,”Ann. Bot. (N.S.), 1937,1, 569–91.
Quinby, J. R. and Karper, R. E. “The effect of short photoperiod on sorghum varieties and first generation hybrids,”Jour. Agr. Res., 1947,75, 295–300.
Saran, A.B. “Studies on the effect of ‘short’ and ‘long day’ treatmsnt on the growth period and the flowering dates of different paddy varieties,”Jour. Ind. Bot. Soc., 1945,24, 153–61.
Sircar, S. M. “Studies in the Physiology of rice, III. Vernalisation by short days,”Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. (India), 1946,12,191–98.
— “Studies in the physiology of rice, V. Vernalisation and photoperiodic response in five varieties,” —, 1949,15, 93–107.
— “Studies on the physiology of rice, VI. Effect of photo-period on development of the shoot apex,”Bot. Gaz., 1953,114, 436–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by Dr. I. Banerji, d.sc.,f.a.sc.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Misra, G. Photoperiodism in rice. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 40, 173–182 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050321
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050321