Skip to main content
Log in

Diseases ofPan (Piper betle) in Sylhet, Assam

Part VII. Effects of some soil treatments on the incidence ofSclerotial wilt

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Summary and Conclusions

The results of the experiments carried out during the years 1940-46 to ascertain the effects of some soil treatments on the incidence of theSclerotial wilt ofpan due toS. rolfsii are presented.

It has been found possible to considerably reduce the percentage of mortality by deep ploughing and by the growing of other crops for a few years on the infested soil. Continuous cropping fot four years withulu grass, paddy or tobacco andmukhi completely controlled the disease.

Applications of organic manures, cowdung and composts appreciably reduced the percentage of death due to the parasite.

Turning under of green manures has also been found beneficial in suppressing the disease.

Applications of zinc sulphate, copper sulphate, ferrous sulphate, manganous sulphate and magnesium sulphate have been found ineffective in minimising or controlling the disease.

Of the fertilizers tried, ammonium sulphate alone or in combination with superphosphate or potassium chloride or both the latter was found effective in appreciably suppressing the disease. Superphosphate or potassium chloride when applied singly or in combination exerted less effect but kept the mortality always below that observed in the control plots.

None of the soil amendments tried exerted any influence.

It may be concluded from these studies that theSclerotial wilt ofpan as it occurs in Assam can be effectively controlled by deep ploughing, by green manuring, by the application of organic manures and fertilizers and by the growing of other crops in the infested fields for a few years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Chowdhury, S. “Cultivation ofPan in Sylhet,”Indian Frmg., 1944,5, 122–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Diseases ofPan (Piper betle) in Sylhet, Assam. V.Sclero-tial Wilt,”Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sec. B, 1945,22, 175–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Effect of Manuring on the sclerotial wilt ofPan (Piper betle),”Indian J. Agric. Sci., 1946,16, 290–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chupp, C. “Club-root in relation to soil alkalinity,”Phytopath., 1928,18, 301–06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, F. E. “Experiments towards the control of the take-all disease of wheat and thePhymatotrichum root rot of cotton,”Tech. Bul. U.S. Dep. Agric., 1942,835.

  • Coons, G. H., Kotila, J. E., and Bochstahler, H. W. ”Black root investigations in Michigan, and Ohio,”Proc. Amer.Soc. Sug. Beet Techno I East, U.S. andCan., 1941.

  • Doran, W. L. “Relation of the adjustment of soil reaction to black root rot of tobacco,”Science, 1927,66, 661–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — “The growth of tobacco and brown root rot of tobacco as affected by timothy infusions of different ages,”J. Agric. Res., 1928,36, 281–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — “Effects of soil temperature and reaction on growth of tobacco infected and uninfected with black root rot,” —, 1929,37, 853–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • - “Increasing soil acidity as a means of controlling black root rot of tobacco,”Bull. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta., 1931,276.

  • Fedorintchik, N. S.Rev. appl. Mycol., 1935,15, 624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows, H. “Studies of certain soil phases of the wheat take all problem,”Phytopath., 1929,19, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, S. D. “Soil conditions and the take-all disease of wheat,”Ann. appl. Biol., 1936,23, 667–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — “Soil conditions and the take-all disease of wheat II. The relation between soil reaction and soil aeration,” —, 1937,24, 747–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — “Soil conditions and the take-all disease of wheat III. Decomposition of the resting mycelium ofOphiobolus graminis in infected wheat stubble buried in the soil,” —, 1938,25, 742–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — “Soil conditions and the take-all disease of wheat. V. Further experiments on the survival ofOphiobolus graminis in infected wheat stubble buried in the soil,” —, 1940,27, 199–04.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goss, R. W., and Afanasiev, M. M. “Influence of rotations under irrigation on potato scab,Rhizoctonia andFusarium wilt,”Bull. Neb. Agric. Exp. Sta., 1938,317.

  • Haenseler, C. M. “Pea root rot studies,”New Jersey Agric. Exp. Sta. 47th Ann. Rep., 1927, 334–39.

  • — “The use of fertilizer in reducing losses from pea root rot caused byAphanomyces enteiches,”Phytopath., 1931,21, 116–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King, C. J., Hope, C., and Eaton, E. D. “Some microbiological activities affected in manurial control of cotton root rot,”J. Agric. Res., 1934,49, 1093–07.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. C. “A method for the control of cotton root rot in the irrigated Southwest,”Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric, 1937,425.

  • Leach, L. D. “Root rot diseases of sugar beet in California,”Sugar Bull., 1941,5, 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxon, A. C. “Beet root rot caused byRhizoctonia solani,”Proc. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Tech., 1939, 38–45.

  • McRae, W., and Shaw, F. J. F. “Influence of manures on the wilt disease ofCajanus indicus, and the isolation of types resistant to the disease,”Sci. Monogr. Imp. Counc. Agric. Res. India, 1933, 7.

  • Millard, W. A.Rep. Univ. Leeds & Yorks Com. Agric., Ed., 1921,118, 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Taylor, C. B. “Antagonisms of micro-organisms as the controlling factor in the inhibition of scab by green manuring,”Ann. appl. Biol., 1927,14, 202–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. F., and Anderson, P. J. “Relation of soil reaction to black root rot and good tobacco,”Tobacco Bull. Com. Agric. Exp. Sta., 1927,8.

  • Petri, L.I metodi di cura del marciume radicale degli. Agrumi. Boll. Staz. Pat. Veg. Roma N. S., 1929,9, 255–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliffe, G. T. “Cotton root rot as affected by crop rotation and tillage at San Antonio Tex,”Tech. Bull. U. S. Dep. Agric, 1934, 436.

  • Rea, H. E. “The control of cotton root rot in the Blackland region of Texas,”Bull. Tex. Agric. Exp. Sta., 1939,573.

  • Rogers, C. H. “The effect of three- and four-year rotations on cotton root rot in the Central Texas Blacklands,”J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 1937,29, 668–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, G. B. “Some factors affecting the pathogenicity ofActinomyces scabies,”Phytopath., 1926,16, 525–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, M. C., and Melchers, L. E. “The effect of rotation and tillage on foot rot of wheat in Kansas,” 1920–24,J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 1924,16, 768–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumbo, C. P., Gainey, P. L., and Clark, F. E. “Microbiological and nutritional factors in the take-all disease of wheat,”J. Agric Res., 1942,64, 653–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. C., and Musbach, F. L. “Effect of moisture, fertility and fertilizer placement on root rot of canning peas in Wisconsin,” —, 1939,59, 579–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, F. L. “Club-root of crucifers,”Tech. Bull. U. S., Dep. Agric., 1930,181.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. R. P. Asthana,f.a.sc.

This work was carried out at the Plant Pathological Laboratory, Sylhet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chowdhury, S. Diseases ofPan (Piper betle) in Sylhet, Assam. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 28, 227–239 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03049960

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03049960

Keywords

Navigation