Skip to main content
Log in

Studies in the genus phytophthora

I. Oospore formation and taxonomy ofPhytophthora palmivora butler

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Summary

The formation of oospores in paired cultures of twenty-five isolates ofPhytophthora was studied. These isolates fall into two main groups—the “plus” and the “minus” and the members of one group form oospores when paired with members of the other group. Some of the isolates were found to lose their sexual capacity with continued cultivation on agar media. Fresh isolates form oospores quickly with complementary strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ashby, S. F.Kew. Bull. Misc. Inform., 1922, 257–62.

  • Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc., 1928,13, 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1929,14, 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, E. J.Mem. Dep. Agri. Ind. Bot. Ser., 1910,3, 221–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, L. C.Dept. Agri. Mysore, Mycol. Ser. Bull., 1910,2, 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzer, W., Bodine, E. W., and Durrell, L. W.Phytopath., 1940,30, 951–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonian, L. H. —, 1931,21, 941–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Bull. Agr. Expt. Stn. W. Virginia Univ., 1934, 262.

  • Lester-Smith, W. C.Ann. Roy. Bot. Gard. Peradenya, 1927,19, 243–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marudarajan, D.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1941,14, 384–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae, W.Mem. Dept. Agri. India (Bot. Ser.), 1918,9, 219–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, M. J.Phytopath., 1930,20, 201–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, J.Jour. Agr. Res., 1917,8, 233–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. M.Adm. Rept. of Govt. Mycologist, Madras, 1940–41, 1941, 60–62.

  • Thompson, A.Malayan Agr. Jour., 1929,17, 53–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, C. M., and Tucker, C. M.Jour. Agr. Res., 1937,54, 933–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. M.Miss. Agr. Expt. Stn. Res. Bull., 1931, 153.

  • -ibid., 1933, 184.

  • Uppal, B. N. & Desai, M. K.Current Science, 1939,8, 122–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatarayan, S. V.Phytopath., 1932,22, 217–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. B. Viswanath,c.i.e., d.sc., f.r.i.c.

All these isolates belong toP. palmivora, Butl. The other species ofPhvtophthora, viz., P. arecœ,P. meadii, P. faberi andP. parasitica var. nicotianœ—are to be merged inP. palmivora as they are found to be morphologically similar and do not exhibit any constant and reliable differences fromP. palmivora and readily form oospores when paired with it. This species is heterothallic; but homothallism has been reported to have been noticed in some isolates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, K.M., Ramakrishnan, T.S., Soumini, C.K. et al. Studies in the genus phytophthora. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 26, 147–163 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03049694

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03049694

Keywords

Navigation