Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on sclerotium-forming fungi

I.Sclerotium cepivorum Berk andS. tuliparum Klebahn Part 1. Cultural studies

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Summary

  1. 1.

    Brief accounts of the literature dealing with the fungiSclerotium cepivorum Berk, andSclerotium tuliparum Klebahn are given.

  2. 2.

    Morphology of the two fungi has been described. The only spores produced byS. cepivorum are microconidia on certain media only. Attempts to germinate these microconidia almost uniformly failed as only 14 spores altogether germinated on 20 per cent, tulip juice.

  3. 3.

    A comparative cultural study ofS. cepivorum andS. tuliparum showed that while both grew well on a great variety of media, nevertheless there was in the case of each a certain amount of specific reaction to the juice of its own host plant. In particular, crude onion juice is markedly inhibitory to the growth ofS. tuliparum. Boiling of the juice largely removes this effect.S. cepivorum does not grow well in tulip juice, boiled or unboiled.

  4. 4.

    Sclerotium cepivorum is favoured by an acid reaction of the culture medium whileSclerotium tuliparum by a neutral or slightly alkaline reaction.

  5. 5.

    The temperature range of growth for both fungi is approximately l°-35° C., with an optimum near 20° C.

  6. 6.

    There is no significant difference by light factor either in growth rate or in the general appearance of the cultures of the two fungi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AnonAgric. Gaz. N.S.W., 1938,49, 423–27.

  2. Asthana, R. P.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1945,22, 168–74.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Booer, J. R.Ann. appl. Biol., 1945,32, 210–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berkeley, M. J.Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 1841,6, 355–65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks, F. T.Gard. Chron., 1926,79, 271–72.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, W.Ann. Bot., 1924,38, 401–04.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bräandao, J. S.Bol. Minist. Agric. Riode J., 1942, June 6.

  8. Bremer, H.Kranke Pflanze, 1935,12, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nachrichtenbl. Deutsch. Pflanzenschutzdienst., 1934,14, 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. — & Nicolaisen, A.Biol. Reichsanst. fur. Land-und Forstw. Flugbl., 1934,130, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buddin, W.J. Minist. Agric., 1937,44, 54–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. —, 1938,44, 1158–59.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Caballero, A.Bol. de la R. Soc. Esp. de Hist. Nat., 1922,22, 210–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cotton, A. D. & Owen, M.N.Jour. Board of Agric. of Great Britain, 1919–20,26, 1093–99.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dowson, W. J.Jour. Royal Horti. Soc., 1928,53, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Du Plessis, S. J.Farming in South Africa, 1934,9, 70.

    Google Scholar 

  17. —, 1932,7, 112–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hauman-Merck, L.Zbl. Bakt., 1915,43, 447.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kawatnura, T.Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan, 1936,6, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klebahn, H.Ztschr. Pflanzenkrank., 1904,14, 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jahrb. Hamburg. Wiss. Anst. 1905,22, Beiheft 3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. —, 1907,24, Beiheft 3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lendner, A.Jour. hort. et. vit. Suisse., 1911,7, 263–67.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marchionatto, J. B.Physis (Rev. Soc. Argentina Cien. Nat.), 1933,XI, 39, 301–05.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Matzulevitch, B. P.Leningrad, Publ., 1932,10, 24 page.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moore, W. C.Report on fungus, Bacterial and other diseases of crops in England and Wales for the years 1933–42, London, H. M. Stationery Office, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Muller-Thurgau, H.Landw. Jahrb. Schweiz., 1908,22, 743–54. (Abstr. inZtschr. Pflanzen-Krank., 1910,20, 50).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nattrass, R. M.Min. Agric. Egypt. Tech. and Sci. Service (Plant Protection Section), 1931,Bull No. 107, 1–9.

  29. Cyprus Agri. Journ., 1933,28, 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ogilvie, L. & Hickman, C. J.Rep. agric. hcrt. Res. Sta. Bristol (1937), 1938,9, 96–109.

    Google Scholar 

  31. — Croxall, H. E. & Hickman, C. J. —, 1939,10, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  32. — & Walton, C. L.Worcs. Agric. Quart. Chron., 1941,9, 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Osterwalder, A. & Camenzind, P.Annu. agric. Suisse., 1940,45, 389–464.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Poeteren, N. vanVersl. Plziekt. Dienst. Wageningen, 1928, No. 51, p. 20.

  35. Ritzema Bos, J.Ztschr. Pflanzenkrank., 1894,4, 218–29.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Plantenzickten., 1903,8, 177–202 (Abstr. inZtschr. Pflanzen-Krank., 1904,14, 349–51).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Valleau, W. D.Plant. Dis. Rep., 1925,9, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van Beyma Thoe Phytopath. Lab. Kingma, F. H. “Willie Commelin Scholten” Baarn (Holland), 1928,12, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Voglino, P.Staz. Sper. Agr. Ital., 1903,36, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Van Slogteren, E.Lab. Voor Bloembollenonderzock te Lisse, Medded., 1931,41, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wakker, J. H.Algem. Vereening. Bloembollen-culture Haarlcm. Verslag, 1884, 1885, 22–26.

  42. Walker, J. C.Phytopath., 1924,14, 315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  43. —, 1926,16, 697–710.

    Google Scholar 

  44. -U.S. Dept. of Agric. Farmers’ Bull. 1060, 1931, 1–24.

  45. Weber, A. Reprinted fromAorbog for Gartneri (1931), 1932.

  46. Whetzel, H. H. & Arthur, J.Cornell Univ. Agri. Expt. Sta. Memoir,89, 1924, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ochrane Rostlin, 1930,10, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rep. agr. Res. Inst. United Kingdom, 1930–31, London. H. M. Stationary Office, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Int. Bull. Pl. Prot., 1939,13, 153–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asthana, R.P. Studies on sclerotium-forming fungi. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 26, 93–107 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03049688

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03049688

Keywords

Navigation