References
CookProc. Roy. Soc. (A), 1932,137, 559.
Taylor and QuinneyPhil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (A),230, 348–49. In a subsequent paper,Ibid., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (A), 1938,145, 1–2, Taylor favours Mohr and Mises-Hencky hypotheses.
BeltramiMath. Ann., 1903, 94.
HaighBrit. Assoc. Rep., 1921, 324 and 1923, 358.
MisesGott. Nach. Math. Phys. Klasse., 1913, 582.
NadaiTrans. Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng., 1933,155, 111.
MohrZeitsch. d. ver. Deutsch. Ing., 1900,44, 1530. An exposition of his theory is given by Guest in “Automobile Engineer,” Feb. 1938.
GuestPhil. Mag. (Ser. 5), 1900,48, 69–132.
—Ibid., (Ser. 7), 1940,29, 289–97;30, 349–69.
SethPhil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (A), 1935,234, 231–64.
— and ShepherdProc. Roy. Soc. (A), 1936,156, 171–92.
—Loc. cit., p. 180.
—Ibid., p. 186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seth, B.R. On Guest’s law of elastic failure. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 14, 37–40 (1941). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03049122
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03049122