Skip to main content
Log in

Auditory brain stem evoked responses (ABRS) in children with delayed speech (DS) a diagnostic problem

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of analysis of auditory brain-stem evoked responses (ABR) are reported in 173 patients with delayed speech (DS). The mean age of the patients is 4.6 years (age range from 1.4 years to 10 years). The patients were classified into 5 groups based on ABR findings:

Group I (62 patients) had normal hearing threshold and peak-interpeak latencies.The mean amplitude of wave I was however, not significantly low (P< 0.03).

Group II (27 patients) had an increased hearing threshold (40 dB), mild delay in the mean absolute peak latency of wave I (P< 0.3), decreased I-V (P< 0.30). There is also a significant latency delay (P< 0.001) and amplitude reduction (P< 0.05), when this wave is compared with that of Group I (as control). These observations are suggestive of mild degree of peripheral hearing deficit in this group.

Group III (49 patients) had gross ABR abnormalities of various nature and hence may be sub-grouped into (a) SNHL cochlear type (55%) (b) SNHL retrocochlear type (4%) and (c) severe degree of SNHL undecisive group (41%). Ten patients (2.7%) among the sub-group (a) had unilateral hearing loss and another 3 had Down’s syndrome.

Group IV (6 patients) had conductive deafness with increased hearing threshold and shifting of ABR waves towards right with normal I-V interval. It may be that conductive deafness is less important as a cause.

Group V (29 patients) had no responses at repeated ABR studies even at higher intensity of 95 dB, the ABR studies of this group correlates with the clinical evaluation of profound deafness.

The delayed speech development in 84 patients (from Group III, IV and V) may be caused by severe degree of hearing deficit as indicated by marked ABR abnormalities. If the mild peripheral hearing loss in Group II is added to the above groups, ABRs could identify 64.6% of our patients with hearing deficit. Hence, ABR test is most reliable and sensitive diagnostic test in detecting hearing loss, a common cause of delayed speech development in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing: Position Statement (1982). Pediatrics; 70: 486–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop DVM. The concept of comprehension in language disorder. In: Martia JAM, Fletcher P. Grunwell P. Hall DMB, eds. Proceedings of the first international symposium on specific speech and language disorders in children. London: Association for all speech impaired children (AFASTIC), 1987–81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiappa KH. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine, 1982. Raven Press, 1140 Avenue of the Americans, New York, 10036.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chiappa KH, Karen MD, Gladstone J, Robert Rand Young Md. (1979) Brainstem auditory evoked responses. Studies of waveform variations in 50 normal human subjects Ach. Neuro.; 36: 81–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerber SE, Jons BL, Costello JM (1977): Behavioral measures in audiometry in infancy. New York, Grune and Stratton; 85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galambos CS and Galambos R. (1979) Brain-stem evoked response auditometry in newborn hearing screening. Arch. Otolaryngol; 105-86–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall D. (1988) Delayed speech in childen. BMJ 1988-297: 1281–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kabiraj MMU, Yaqub B, Shamena AR, Al-Bunyan M, Daif AK, Hussain A and Kordi MT. Diagnostic role of evoked potential audiometry (EPA) and brain-stem evoked potetals (BAEPs) in neurobrucellosis. (To be published).

  9. Mason SM and Mellor DH. Brain-stem midle latency and late cortical evoked potentials in children with speech and language disorders. (1984) Electro-encephalography and Clin Neurophysiol; 59: 297–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozdamar O, Kraus N. Stein L. (1983) Auditory brain-stem responses in infants recovering from meningitis: audiologic evaluation. Arch. Otoloaryngol; 109: 103–18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rutter M. (1987) Assessment of language disorder. In: Yule W., Rlutter M., eds. Language development and disorders. (Clinics in developmental medicine 101/102). Oxford: mackeith Press, Blackwell Scienfific Publications:195; 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Starr A and Anchor LJ. (1975) Auditory brain-stem responses in neurological disease. Arch. Neurol (Chic); 32: 761–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stockard JJ and Rossier VS. (1977) Clinical and pathologic correlates of brain-stem auditory response abnormalities. Neurology (Minneap); 27: 316–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shannon DA, Felix JK, Krumholz A., Goldstein AK and Harris KC. (1984) Hearing screening of high risk newborns with brain-stem evoked potentials: A follow-up study. Pediatrics; 73: 22–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Squures N, Aine C, Buchwald J, Norman R and Galbraith G. (1980) Abnormal functioning of the auditory brainstem pathway in the Down’s syndrome. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology; 50: 172–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sohmer H and Student M. (1978) Auditory nerve and brain-stem evoked responses in normal austistic. minimal brain dysfunction and psychomotor retard children. Eectroencephalogr & Clin Neurophysiol; 44: 380–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Husain, A. Auditory brain stem evoked responses (ABRS) in children with delayed speech (DS) a diagnostic problem. IJO & HNS 46, 191–196 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03048572

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03048572

Keywords

Navigation