Summary
In this paper the unisensory method is compared favourably with the traditional method of treating deaf children. Its value to the child, mother, and the future course of education of the hearing handicapped child is shown.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloom, F (1963) “Our deaf children” Heinemann. 133
Bloomfield, A. M., (1967)—Guidance to parents of dead children — a perspective”. Brit. J. Disorders Commune 1.1
Buchli, M. (1961)—Proceedings of the 2nd international course in paedo-audiology, Groningen University.
Dale, D. M. C. (1967)—“Deaf children at home and at School”
Ewing I.R. and Ewing A.W.G. (1964)—“Teaching deaf children to talk”.
Gantie M. (1960)—“Modern edu cational treatment of deafness” Ed. Ewing 30, 2.
Holm, R.A. (1960)—“The Modern educational treatment of deafness”. Ed. Ewing 32.
Huicinga, E (1961)—“Proceedings of the 2nd international course in paedo-audiology. Groningen University”.
Pringle, M.L.K. (1965) Deprivation and education. 51.
Stewart, J.L., Pollack, D., Down M., (1964)—“A unisensory program for the limited-hearing child”. Asha 6,5
Stwart J.L. and Funaki F (1965) Hearing aid selection for young children, Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 85, 374–377.
Taylor, I.G. (1964) Neurological mechanism of hearing and speech in children, 22.
Tervoort, B. (1960) “The modern educational treatment of deafness”. Ed. Ewing, 62
“The Health of the School child 1962–63” (1964)—H.M.S.O. 69 Whetnall, E. and Fry D. B. (1964), The deaf child.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DE, S.K., Mukherjee, M.K. The importance of home training in the treatment of deafness in children. Ind. J. Otol. 22, 210–216 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03048418
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03048418