Summary
When the difference in hearing between the two ears is of some considerable degree, it is essential to block the betterhearing ear by a masking device, for accurate estimation of the threshold of hearing of the bad ear. In air conduction tests, when the difference in thresholds of the two ears exceeds 50 db the better ear should be excluded by masking. In bone conduction tests, the untested ear should always be excluded by an air conducted masking sound. Appropriate masking levels must be determined during the course of the test by Zwislocki method and the maximum usable masking level should not be exceeded during the tests. White noise is a better masking sound than pure tones. “Paracussis Willist” is only apparent improvement of hearing in a noisy place, these patients deriving benefit only by the raising of the speaker’s voice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Denes and Nauton: “Masking in puretone audiometry” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 45 (1952), 790.
Fred Harbert: “Masking levels for clinical use” A. M. A. Arch. Otolaryng 66 (1957), 214.
Gunner Lidden et al: “Masking in clinical audiometry”. Acta Otolaryng 50, (1959), 124.
Hood J. D. “The Principles and Practice of Bone Conduction Audiometry” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 50, (1959), 689.
Thorleif Sohoel: Masking in Puretone Audiometry” J. L. O. 72, (1958), 959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Misra, R.N., Mukundan, K. Observations on masking in puretone audiometry. Indian J Otolaryngol 14, 77–86 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03048229
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03048229