Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological nature of floral cup in Lauraceae

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

On the basis of anatomical criteria the floral cup of Lauraceae can be regarded as appendicular, as the traces entering into the floral cup are morphologically compound, differentiated into tepal and stamen traces at higher levels. The ontogenetic studies also support this contention. The term Perigynous hypanthium is retained for the floral cup of Lauraceae as it is formed as a result of intercalary growth occurring underneath the region of perianth and androecium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey L H 1949Manual of cultivated plants (New York: Macmillans)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillon H 1880The natural history of plants 6 (London: L. Reeve)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner C E B 1948 The floral vascular supply inEpilobium and related genera;Candollea 11 277–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Core E L 1955Plant taxonomy (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald M L 1950 Gray’smanual of botany (New York: Am. Book Co.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason H A 1952The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the north-eastern United States and adjacent Canada,2 (Lancaster, Penna: Lancaster Press Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson A 1950Families of dicotyledons (Waltham, Mass.: Chronica Botanica)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinig K H 1951 Studies in floral morphology of Thymelaeaceae;Am. J. Bot. 38 113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker J D 1879Flora of British India 2 (London: L Reeve)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson J 1959Families of flowering plants 1 Dicotyledons (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson G 1934 The morphology of the flowers ofRosa and certain closely related genera;Am. J. Bot. 21 453–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepson W L 1951A manual of flowering plants of California (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasapligil B 1951 Morphological and ontogenetic studies ofUmbellularia californica Nutt. andLaurus nobilis L.;Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 25 115–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehne E 1903 Lythraceae; inEngler’s Das Pflanzenreich 17 1–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence G H M 1951Taxonomy of vascular plants (New York: Macmillans)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins P 1972 Das karpell im ober-und unter standigen Gynoecium;Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 85 291–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins P, Merxmuller H and Satter R 1972 Zur terminologie interkalarer Becherbildungen in bluten;Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 85 294

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Maout E and Decaisne J 1876A general system of botany, description and analytical (London: Longmans Green)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley J 1853The vegetable kingdom 3rd ed (London: Bradbeny and Evans)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S 1974Morphological and ontogenetic studies in Lauraceae; Ph.D. Thesis, Meerut University, Meerut

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S and Murty Y S 1978 Nature of floral cup inStellaria glauca; Acta Bot. Indica (in press)

  • Palmatier E A 1943Some studies on floral anatomy and morphology of the Saxifragaceae, Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin J 1955 A plea for simpler gynoecium;Phytomorphology 5 46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri V 1942 Studies in floral anatomy. H. Floral anatomy of Moringaceae with special reference to gynoecium constitution;Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India B8 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri V 1947 Studies in floral anatomy. IV. Vascular anatomy of the flower of certain species of the Passifloraceae;Am. J. Bot. 34 562–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao V S 1949 The morphology of calyx tube and origin of perigyny in Turneraceae;J. Indian bot. Soc. 28 198–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece P C 1939 Floral anatomy ofAvocado;Am. J. Bot. 26 429–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendle A B 1938The classification of flowering plants 2 (Cambridge: Univ. Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastri R L N 1952 Studies in Lauraceae. I. Floral anatomy ofCinnamomum iners Reinov. andCassytha filiformis Linn;J. Indian bot. Soc. 31 240–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders E R 1925 Perigyny and carpel polymorphism in some Rosaceae;New Phytol. 24 206–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders E R 1936 On rhythmic development and radial organization in the flower;J. Linn. Soc. London Bot. 50 291–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma D N 1949Vascular anatomy of some species of the Cactaceae, M.Sc. Thesis, Agra University, Agra

  • Smith F H and Smith E C 1942a Anatomy of inferior ovary ofDarbya;Am. J. Bot. 29 464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith F H and Smith E C 1942b Floral anatomy of the Santalaceae and related forms;Oreg. State Monogr. Stud. Bot. no. 5

  • Smith G H 1928 Vascular anatomy of Ranalian flowers. II. Ranunculaceae (contd.), Menis-permaceae, Calycanthaceae, Annonaceae;Bot. Gaz. 85 152–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiagi Y D 1955 Studies in floral morphology. II. Vascular anatomy of the flower in certain species of the Cactaceae;J. Indian bot. Soc. 34 408–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson A H 1940 The floral anatomy of Kalanchoideae;Am. J. Bot. 27 595–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pal, S. Morphological nature of floral cup in Lauraceae. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 88, 277–281 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03046191

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03046191

Keywords

Navigation