Skip to main content
Log in

The bearing of cytological studies on the phylogeny of the marchantiales

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Summary

The paper gives a brief account of the cytological studies on the Hepaticeae and indicates the bearing of these on the problem of the phylogeny of the Marchantiales. The data available have been analysed and grouped under the following four headings: the sex chromosomes, hybridization, polyploidy and gene mutations, and the morphology and numbers of chromosomes. The information regarding the chromosomal numbers has been tabulated and the probable basic numbers in different families have been indicated. From the table given on page 145 it will be seen that the basic number of chromosomes (gametophytic number,i.e., ra-number) for the majority of the genera of the Marchantiaces and the Jungermanniaceae seems to be 9, and for the genera of the Ricciacete it seems to be 8. In the light of this cytological observation the existing schemes of classification of the Marchantiales have been examined with a view to knowing how far the morphological data and the cytological data are correlated. If it be supposed that the basic complex of the ancestors of the Marchantiales called Pro-Marchantiales in this paper, had 8 chromosomes in their genom and changed to a 9 chromosomal condition later by fragmentation, then there is some justification for the progression hypothesis. On the contrary, if it be imagined that the Pro-Marchantialean complex consisted of 9 chromosomes originally and got reduced to 8, the reduction hypothesis may seem plausible.But when either of these ideas are pressed further and the number of chromosomes in different genera in the various schemes of classification given by Cavers, Kashyap, Verdoorn and Evans are considered, the verdict of cytology on either of these schemes is not unequivocal, as the main argument brought in the discussion for or against a theory is based on the difference of a single chromosome only; and it may well seem doubtful whether that alone can constitute sufficient proof for or against a scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Allen, C. E.Science, 1917,46, 466;Genetics, 1924,9, 530; 1925,10, 1; 1926,11, 83;Amer. Naturalist, 1932,66, 107;Proceed Nat. Acad. Sci., 1934,20, 147;Bot. Rev., 1935,1, 269;Cytologia, 1937,Fujii Jub. Vol.,1, 494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E.Bot. Rev., 1937,3, 335–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgeff, H.Zeitschrift f. induk. Abst. und Vererb., 1930,54, 239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavers, F. “The Inter-Relationships of the Bryophyta,”New Phytologist, Reprint, 1911.

  • Chavan, A.The Bryologist, 1937a,40, 58;Amer. Journ. Bot., 1937b,24, 484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, R. S. See Kashyap, 1932b.

  • Correns, C.Handb. Verebungswiss., 1928, II C.

  • Evans, A. W.Bot. Rev., 1939,5, 49–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, K.Flora, 1910, N.F.Band 1, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gola, G.Atti Delia R. Acad. Delle Sci. Di Torino, 1914,49.

  • Haupt, G.Zeit, induk. Abst. und Vererb. L., 1932,62, 367; 1933,63, 390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitz, E.Ztschr. f. Bot., 1927a,18, 625–81;Abh. d. naturwiss. Ver., Hamburg, 1927b,21, 3/4 Heft, 48–58;Jahrb. f. wiss Botan., 1928,69, 762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfer, K. “Karyologie” in Verdoorn’sManual of Bryology, 1932b, 159–206.

  • Ishikawa, M.Bot. Mag., 1916,30, 404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap, S. R.New Phytologist, 1914,13, 206–26 and 308–22; 1915,14, 1;Proc. Asiatic Soc. of Bengal (New Series), 1919,15, 152; “Liverworts of the Western Himalayas and the Punjab Plains,” Part I, 1929; “Supplement” to the above, 1932a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -and Chopra, R. S.Ibid., Part II, 1932b.

  • — and Pande, S. K.Journ. Ind. Bot. Soc., 1922,3, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, L. P. —, 1929,8, 103;Bot. Gaz., 1932,93, 103;Journ. Ind. Bot. Soc., 1936,15, 235;Journ. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 1937,39, 358.

    Google Scholar 

  • KochMalpighia, 1890–91,4.

  • Lorbeer, G.Zeitschi: f. induk. Abst. u. Vererb. L., 1927,44, 1;Zeitschr. f. Bot., 1930,23, 932;Jahrb. wiss Bot., 1934,80, 567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahabalé, T. S., and Gorji, G. H.Curr. Sci., 1941,10, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchai, El. and Em. A series of papers inMem. Cour, andBull. Acad. Roy. Belg. Cl. Sci., 1906–11.

  • Matthey, R.Rev. Suisse de Zool., 1931,38, 118; 1933,40, 281.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClung, C.Journ. Morph., 1914,25, 651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, P. N.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1938,8, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Mehra, H. L. —, 1939,9, 287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges., 1914,32, 262;Planta, 1931,13, 210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müntzing, A.Hereditas, 1936,21, 263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande, S. K.Journ. Ind. Bot. Soc., 1924,4, 117; 1932,11, 169; 1933,12, 110;Proc Ind. Acad. Sci., 1934,1, 205;Journ. Ind. Bot. Soc., 1936,15, 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchottländerCohn’s Beitr. Biol., 1892,6.

  • Schratz, E.Arch. mikr. Anat., 1924,63, 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showalter, A.Bot. Gaz., 1921,72, 245;Amer. Journ. Bot., 1923,10, 170;Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 1928,14, 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siler, M. B.Proceed. Nat. Acad. Sci., 1934,20, 603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, K. S.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1939,10, 88;Journ. Madras Univ., 1940,12, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephani, F. “Species Hepaticarum,” Genéve, 1898–1925,1–6.

  • Swezy, O.Amer. Nat., 1935,69, 383;Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol., 1937, I, 149–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischler, G.Biolog. Zentralbl., 1928,48, 321; “Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen,” inTabulæ Biologicæ Periodicæ, published by W. Junk, 1931, 1935–36;Bot. Jahrb., 1935,67, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdoorn, Fr.Ann. Bryol., 1931,4, 123; 1932a,5, 125;Manual of Bryology, 1932b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, J.Ann. Bot., 1925,39, 563; 1928,42, 707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weittstein, F.Bibliogr. Gen., 1925,.1, 38; early papers inZeitschr. induk. Abst. Vererb., 1924,33, etc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, G. B.Amer. Journ. Bot., 1939,26, 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Prof. J. J. Asana, Ahmedabad

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahabalé, T.S. The bearing of cytological studies on the phylogeny of the marchantiales. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 16, 141–154 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03046184

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03046184

Keywords

Navigation