Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying pelagic-benthic coupling in the North Sea: Are we asking the right questions?

  • Published:
Senckenbergiana maritima Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coupling between pelagic and benthic processes occurs through the signals sent between the water column and the seabed. Huge methodological challenges are associated with the quantification of the signals being sent between these two domains — especially in a relatively shallow and heavily fished region such as the North Sea where deployment of sediment traps or bottom mounted cameras or samplers is difficult. Thus, there are relatively few sites in the North Sea for which good data are available for describing pelagic-benthic (or near shore-offshore) coupling and considerable effort is devoted to obtaining more and better data describing this exchange. Efforts to quantify exchange between the water column and the sediment must continue. However, such studies will not, in themselves, lead to a quantification of pelagic-benthic coupling in the North Sea. We identify here other areas of study that we consider to be important in order to, ultimately, quantify the pelagic-benthic coupling on the basin-scale. Current knowledge on regional annual differences in new production (i.e., that which leads to the production of new organic material and, ultimately, sedimentation from the water column to the seabed) in this region is reviewed. Differences in the magnitude of new production can be predicted to influence both the physical/chemical characteristics of the bottom and benthic communities. As these differences are under the control of local and regional oceanographic processes, it is argued that these processes will also influence pelagic-benthic coupling and attention should be given to these geographical differences when considering benthic-pelagic coupling. Evidence is also presented that interannual climatic variability, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), influences pelagic-benthic coupling in the North Sea. The influence of climate variability in establishing conditions for benthic communities is also identified as a neglected region of study that is crucial in order to understand and quantify the coupling between pelagic and benthic communities. Finally, the paper considers whether the organic signal reaching the benthos might be most readily interpretable through measurement of meiofaunal biomass and activity, rather than through the more common practice of examining the macrofaunal benthos community. The meiofauna has been shown to be important in the flux of energy and nutrients. We argue that foraminiferans may deserve more study in this respect. Their large numbers in combination with structural and physiological adaptations suggest that these organisms may be of greater importance than other meiofaunal organisms of comparative size and abundance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altenbach, A. V. (1985): Die Biomasse der bentischen Foraminiferen. Auswertung von „Meteor“-Expeditionen im östlichen Nordatlantik. — Ph.D. Thes. Univ. Kiel: 167 pp.

  • Altenbach, A. &Sarnthein, M. (1989): Productivity record in benthic foraminifera. — In:Berger, W. H. &Smeta-cek, V. S. &Wefer, G. [Eds.]: Productivity of the Ocean: Present and Past: 255–269; Chichester UK (John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmawidjaja, D. M. &Jorissen, F. J. &Puskaric, S. &Van der Zwaan, G. J. (1992): Microhabitat selection by benthic foraminifera in the northern Adriatic Sea. — J. Foraminiferal Res.,22: 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. B. &Meador, J. P. (1979): Temporal persistence of biological patch structure in an abyssal benthic community. — Mar. Biol.,51: 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. B. &Hessler, R. R. &Smith, R. &Jumars, P. A. (1978): Spatial dispersion of benthic foraminifera in the abyssal central north Pacific. — Limnol. Oceanogr.,23: 401–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, D. S. M. &Lampitt, R. S. &Rice, A L. &Mantoum, R. F. C. (1983): Seasonal sedimentation of phytoplankton to the deep-sea benthos. — Nature,302: 520–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bo Pedersen, F. (1994). The oceanographie and biological tidal cycle succession in shallow sea fronts in the North Sea and English Channel. — Estuar. coast. Shelf Sei.,38: 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltovskoy, E. &Wright, R. (1976): Recent Foraminifera Haag. — 515 pp.; The Hague (Junk b.v.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. B. (1993): Evidence of benthic pelagic coupling at a station off the Northumberland coast. — J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol.,172: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cedhagen, T. (1988): Position in the sediment and feeding ofAstrorhiza limicolaSandahl 1857 (Foraminiferida). — Sarsia,73: 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedhagen, T. (1991): Retention of chloroplasts and bathymetric distributional pattern in the sublittoral foraminiferanNonionellina labradorica. — Ophelia,33: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedhagen, T. (1992): Taxonomy and feeding biology of some benthic rhizopods, mainly foraminiferans (Protozoa). — Diss. Univ. Göteborg: 212 pp.

  • Cedhagen, T. (1993): Biology ofPelosina arborescensPearcey 1914, with comparative notes onAstrorhiza limicolaSandahl 1857 (Foraminifera: Astrorhizidae). — Ophelia,37: 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedhagen, T. (1994): Taxonomy and biology ofHyrrokkin sarcophaga n. gen. et sp. n., a parasitic foraminiferan (Rosalinidae). — Sarsia,79: 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedhagen, T. (1996): Foraminiferans as food for cephalaspideans (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia), with notes on secondary tests around calcareous foraminiferans. — Phuket Marine Biological Center Spec. Publ.,16: 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. &Kanneworff, E. (1985): Sedimenting phytoplankton as a major food source for suspension and deposit feeders in the Øresund. — Ophelia,24 (3): 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corliss, B. H. &Weering, T. C. E. van (1993): Living stained benthic foraminifers within surficial sediments of the Skagerrak. — Mar. Geol.,111: 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coull, B. C. &Ellison, R. L. &Fleeger, J. W. &Higgins, R. P. &Hope, W. D. &Hummon, W. D. &Rieger, R. M. &Sterrer, W. E. &Thiel, H. &Tietjen, J. H. (1977): Quantitative estimates of the meiofauna from the deep sea off North Carolina, U.S.A. — Mar. Biol.,39: 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. M. &Payne, R. (1984): Supply of organic matter to the sediment in the northern North Sea during a spring phytoplankton bloom. — Mar. Biol,78: 315–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeLaca, T. E. (1982): Use of dissolved amino acids by the foraminiferNotodendrodes ankatctikos. — Amer. Zool.,22: 683–690.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeLaca, T. E. &Karl, D. M. &Lipps J. H (1981): Direct use of dissolved organic carbon by agglutinated benthic foraminifera. — Nature,289: 287–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dugdale, R. C. &Goering, J. J. (1967): Uptake of new and regenerated forms of nitrogen in primary production. — Limnol. Oceanogr.,12: 196–206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, R. L. (1984) Foraminifera and meiofauna on an intertidal mudflat, Cornwall, England: populations; respiration and secondary production; and energy budget. —Hydrobiol.,109: 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, W. W. &Lee, J. J. (1991): Histochemical evidence for digestion inHeterostegina depressa andOperculina ammonoides (Foraminiferida). — Endocytobiosis Cell Res.,8: 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, J. D. &Tyler, P. A. (1991): Deep-sea biology: A natural history of organisms at the deep-sea floor. — 504 pp.; Cambridge (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, O. (1993): Meiobenthology. The Microscopic Fauna in Aquatic Sediments. — 328 pp.; Berlin (Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. T. (1999): Foraminifera: A biological overview. — In:Sen Gupta, B. K. [Ed.]: Modern Foraminifera: 37–55; Dordrecht (Kluwer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, A. J. (1986): Meiofaunal foraminiferans from the bathyal Porcupine Seabight (north-east Atlantic): size structure, standing stock, taxonomic composition, species diversity and vertical distribution in the sediment. — Deep-Sea Res.,33: 1345–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, A. J. (1988): A response by benthic Foraminifera to the deposition of phytodetritus in the deep sea. — Nature,332: 70–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, A. J. &Lambshead, P. J. D. (1989): Influence of seasonal deposited phytodetritus on benthic foraminiferal populations in the bathyal northeast Atlantic: the species response. — Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.,58: 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, A. J. &Rathburn, A. E. (1999): Temporal variability in living deep-sea benthic foraminifera: a review. — Earth-Sci. Rev.,46: 187–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, A. J. &Turley, C. M. (1990): Responses by benthic organisms to inputs of organic material to the ocean floor: a review. — Phil. Trans, roy. Soc. London, A331: 119–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, A. J. &Levin, L. A. &Linke, P. &Heeger, T. (1992): The role of benthic foraminifera in deep-sea food webs and carbon cycling. — In:Rowe, G. &Pariente, V. [Eds.]: Deep Sea Food Chains and the Global Carbon Cycle. — NATO ASI Series C,360: 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, G. (1987): Benthic energy flow during a simulated autumn bloom sedimentation. — Mar. Ecol. Progr. Sen,33: 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, G. (1989): Benthic-pelagic coupling in a deep-sea benthic community. — Nature,341: 437–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, G. (1992): Benthic-pelagic coupling: a benthic view. — Oceanogr. mar. Biol. Ann. Rev.,30: 149–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, F. &Rogerson, A. &Laybourn-Parry, J. (1994): Respiration rates and biovolumes of common benthic foraminifera (Protozoa). — J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.,74: 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmingsen, A. M. (1960): Energy metabolism as related to body size and respiratory surfaces, and its evolution. — Rep. Steno Hosp.,9 (2): 1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R. R. (1974): The structure of deep benthic communities from central oceanic waters. — In:Miller, C. B. [Ed.]: The Biology of the Oceanic Pacific: 79–93; Corvalis (Oregon State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepps, M. W. (1942): Studies onPolystomellaLamarck (Foraminifera). — J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.,25: 607–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorissen, F. J. &Barmawidjaja, D. M. &Puskaric, S. &Zwaan, G. J. van der (1992): Vertical distribution of benthic foraminifera in the northern Adriatic Sea. The relation with the organic flux. — Mar. Micropaleontol.,19: 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josefson, A. B. &Conley, D. (1997): Benthic response to a pelagic front. — Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.,147 (1–3): 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josefson, A. B. &Jensen, J. N. &Ærtebjerg, G. (1993): The benthos community structure anomaly in the late 1970s and early 1980s — a result of a major food pulse. — J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol.,172: 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanneworff, E. &Christensen, H. (1986): Benthic community respiration in relation to sedimentation of phytoplankton in the Øresund. — Ophelia,26: 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J. &Faber, W. W. &Lee, R. E. (1991): Granular reticular digestion-a possible preadaptation to benthic foraminiferal symbiosis? — Symbiosis,10: 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, J. H. &Valentine, J. W. (1970): The role of foraminifera in the trophic structure of marine communities. — Lethaia,3: 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loubere, P. &Fariduddin, M. (1999): Benthic Foraminifera and the flux of organic carbon to the seabed. — In:Sen Gupta, B. K. [Ed.]: Modern Foraminifera: 181–199; Dordrecht (Kluwer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Reil, L. A. &Koester, M. (1991): Fine-scale distribution of hydrolytic activity associated with foraminiferans and bacteria in deep-sea sediments of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea. — Distribution and Activity of Microorganisms in the Sea. 4th European Marine Microbiology Symposium, Kiel 1990. — Kieler Meeresforsch. Sonderheft,8: 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodley, L. Heip, C. H. R. &Middelburg, J. J. (1998a): Benthic activity in sediments of the northwestern Adriatic Sea: sediment oxygen consumption, macro- and meiofauna dynamics. — J. Sea Res.,40: 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodley, L. &Zwaan, G. J. van der. &Rutten, G. M. W. &Boom, R. C. E. &Kempers, A. J. (1998b): Subsurface activity of benthic foraminifera in relation to pore-water oxygen content: laboratory experiments. — Mar. Micropaleontol,34: 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodley, L. &Boschker, H. T. S. &Middelburg, J. J. &Pel, R. &Herman, P. M. J. &Deckere, E. de &Heip, C. H. R. (2000): Ecological significance of benthic foraminifera:13C labelling experiments. — Mar. Ecol. Progr. Sen,202: 289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. W. (1991): Ecology and Palaeoecology of Benthic Foraminifera. — 397 pp.; New York (Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaisen, W. &Christensen, H. (1986): Pelagic turnover and transport to the bottom of particulate organic material in the Northern Øresund. — Ophelia,26: 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, T. G. &Lokkegaard, B. &Richardson, K. &Bo Pedersen, F. &Hansen, L. (1993): The structure plankton communities in the Dogger Bank area (North Sea) during a stratified situation. — Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.,95: 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordberg, K. &Gustafsson, M. &Krantz, A.-L. (2000): Decreasing oxygen concentrations in the Gullmar Fjord, Sweden, as confirmed by benthic foraminifera, and the possible association with NAO. — J. mar. Syst.,23: 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, M. (1993): The fate of an early spring bloom in the Kattegat. — Ophelia,37 (1): 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepenburg, D. &Ambrose, W. G. &Brandt, A. &Renaud, P. E. &Ahrens, M. J. &Jensen, P. (1997): Benthic community patterns reflect water column processes in the northeast Water polynya (Greenland). — J. mar. Syst.,10: 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathburn, A. E. &Corliss, B. H. (1994): The ecology of living stained deep-sea benthic foraminifera from the Sulu Sea. — Paleoceanogr.,9: 87–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. &Bo Pedersen, F. (1998): Estimation of new production in the North Sea: consequences for temporal and spatial variability in phytoplankton. — ICES J. mar. Sei.,55: 574–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. &Visser, A. W. &Bo Pedersen, Pedersen, F. (2000): Subsurface phytoplankton blooms fuel pelagic production in the North Sea. — J. Plankton Res.,22 (9): 1663–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. &Nielsen, T G. &Bo Pedersen, F. &Heilmann, J. P. &Løkkegard, B. &Kaas, H. (1998): Spatial heterogeneity in the structure of the planktonic food web in the North Sea. — Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.,168: 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegman, R. &Malschaert, H. &Colijn, F. (1990): Primary production of phytoplankton at a frontal zone located at the northern slope of the Dogger Bank (North Sea). — Mar. Biol.,105: 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R. (1983): Die Wirkung von Sedimentationsereignissen auf die bentische Lebensgemeinschaft. — Ph.D. Thés. Univ. Kiel: 116 pp.

  • Sen Gupta, B. K. [Ed.] (1999): Modern Foraminifera. — 371 pp.; Dordrecht (Kluwer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smaal, A. C. &Verhagen, J. H. G. &Coosen, J. &Haas, H. A. (1986): Interaction between seston quantity and quality and benthic suspension feeders in the Oosterschelde, The Netherlands. — Ophelia,26: 385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. L. &White, G. A. &Laver, M. B. &Haugness, J. A. (1978): Nutrient exchange and oxygen consumption by deep-sea benthic communities: Preliminary in situ measurements. — Limnol. Oceanogr.,23: 997–1005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steemann Nielsen, E. (1952): The use of radio-active carbon (C14) for measuring organic production in the sea. — ICES J. Cons.18(2): 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tendal, O. &Hessler, R. R. (1977): An introduction to the biology and systematics of Komokiacea (Textulariina, Foraminiferida). — Galathea Rep.,14: 165–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, H. (1975): The size structure of the deep-sea benthos. — Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol.,60: 575–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunberg, B. G. &Nelson, W. G. (1998): Do climatic oscillations influence cyclical patterns of soft bottom macro-benthos communities on the Swedish west coast? — Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.,170: 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R. M. &Join, I. R. &Radford, P. J. (1979): Secondary production of the benthos in an estuarine environment. — In:Jeffries, R. L. &Davy, A. J. [Eds.]: Ecological Processes in Coastal Environments: 429–450; Oxford (Blackwells).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann, P. (1991): Dynamics of primary production and sedimentation in shallow fjords and polls of Western Norway. — Oceanogr. mar. Biol. Ann. Rev.,29: 87–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, R. I. &McIntyre, A. D. (1964): Some quantitative comparisons of off-shore meiobenthos and macrobenthos south of Martha’s Vineyard. — Limnol. Oceanogr.,9: 485–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, T. (1960): The hadal community, an introduction. — Deep-Sea Res.,6: 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenburg, J. E. &Mackensen, A. (1998a): On the vertical distribution of living (rose Bengal stained) benthic foraminifers in the Arctic Ocean. — J. Foraminiferal Res.,28 (4): 268–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenburg, J. E. &Mackensen, A. (1998b): Living benthic foraminifers from the central Arctic Ocean: faunal composition, standing stock and diversity. — Mar. Micropaleontol.,34: 153–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, K., Cedhagen, T. Quantifying pelagic-benthic coupling in the North Sea: Are we asking the right questions?. Senckenbergiana maritima 31, 215–224 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03043030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03043030

Keywords

Navigation