Skip to main content
Log in

Outpatient coronary angiography: Indications, safety, and complication rates

Ambulante Koronarangiographic: Indikationen, Sicherheit und Komplikationsraten

  • Outpatient Coronary Angiography and Interventions
  • Published:
Herz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the years since the introduction of outpatient cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography, the indications for the use of these procedures have expanded rapidly with advancements in surgical and endovascular procedures. The safety of outpatient coronary angiography has been well established, comparing very favorably with that of inpatient procedures. At present, a variety of different outpatient facilities exist. Catheterization laboratories may adjoint a hospital or be free-standing; the safety and success of procedures performed in mobile cardiac catheterization laboratories has also been described.

There are a variety of access techniques for cardiac catheterization in use today, and there are many types and sizes of catheters available. Miniaturization of equipment has reduced complications and allowed early ambulation and discharge from outpatient laboratories. In addition, the development and refinement of catheters and techniques for achieving hemostasis may allow further reductions in patient stay and complications. The complication rates of outpatient cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography are, in fact, quite low — in some cases, lower complication rates are seen in the outpatient population than in the inpatient population. Although this is certainly related in part to the fact that outpatients generally have more stable disease, it is clear that careful equipment choices, proper technique, and adequate monitoring have contributed to the success of these important outpatient procedures.

Zusammenfassung

Die ambulante Koronarangiographie hat sich aufgrund der Fortschritte in der Herzchirurgie und in der interventionellen Kardiologie schnell verbreitet. Die Sicherheit der ambulanten Koronarangiographie ist dokumentiert, die Risiken liegen im Bereich der stationär durchgeführten Koronarangiographie. Zur Zeit gibt es unterschiedliche Konzepte: Katheterlabors sind entweder einem Krankenhaus angeschlossen oder unabhängig hiervon installiert. Darüber hinaus wurde über die Sicherheit und Erfolgsrate von mobilen Herzkatheterlabors berichtet.

Heute werden unterschiedliche arterielle Zugänge gewählt, dementsprechend gibt es viele unterschiedliche Arten und Größen von Herzkathetern. Die Miniaturisierung der Ausrüstung hat zu einer Reduktion der Komplikationsraten geführt und gestattet eine frühe Mobilisierung bzw. Entlassung aus ambulanten Katheterlabors. Zusätzlich hat die Entwicklung und Verbesserung von Techniken zur raschen Hämostase eine weitere Verminderung der Patientenaufenthaltsdauer und eventuell auch der Komplikationen gebracht. Die Komplikationsrate ambulanter Koronarangiographien ist in der Tat sehr niedrig. Gelegentlich werden auch bei ambulant durchgeführten Herzkatheteruntersuchungen geringere Komplikationsraten beschrieben als bei einem stationären Krankengut. Obwohl dies sicher zum Teil darauf zurückzuführen ist, daß die ambulant durchgeführten Herzkatheteruntersuchungen bei stabileren Patienten durchgeführt werden, hat die sorgfältige Auswahl des Kathetermaterials, die geeignete Technik und das adäquate Monitoring zum Erfolg der wichtigen ambulanten Koronarangiographien beigetragen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams DF, Fraser DB, Abrams HL. The complications of coronary arteriography. Circulation 1973;48:609–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baird CL. The trend to outpatient care. II. Ambulatory cardiac catheterization. Virginia Med 1980;107:621–2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baum RA, Gantt DS. Safety of decreasing bedrest after coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:230–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bersin RM, Elliot CM, Elliot AV, et al. Mobile cardiac catheterization registry: report of the first 1001 patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;31:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Block P, Ockene I, Goldberg RJ, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of outpatient versus inpatient cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1251–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourassa MG, Noble J. Complication rate of coronary arteriography: A review of 5250 cases studied by a percutaneous femoral technique. Circulation 1976;53:106–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark VL, Dolce J. Unplanned admissions after outpatient cardiac catheterization. Clin Cardiol 1993;16:823–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clements SD Jr, Gatlin S. Outpatient cardiac catheterization: a report of 3000 cases. Clin Cardiol 1991;14:477–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Colle JP, Delarche N, Bourdeaqud’Hui A, Laborde N. Nondiagnosed left main ostial stenosis partly due to the use of 5 French coronary angiographic catheters. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991;22:180–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis K, Kennedy JW, Kemp HG, Judkins MP, Gosselin AJ, Killip T. Complications of coronary arteriography from the collaborative study of coronary artery surgery (CASS). Circulation 1979;59:1105–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Diethrich EB, Kinard SA, Pierce SA, Koopot R. Outpatient cardiac catheterization and arteriography: Twenty-month experience at the Arizona Heart Institute. Cardiovasc Dis Bull Texas Heart Inst 1981;8:195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fierens E. Outpatient coronary arteriography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1984;10:27–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fighali S, Kraicer Z, Gonzales-Camid F, Ward M, Edelman S, Leachman R. Safety of outpatient cardiac catheterization. Chest 1985;88:349–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fye WB. Coronary arteriography — it took a long time! Circulation 1984;70:781–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heuser RR, Mehta SS, Strumpf RK, Ponder R. Intracoronary stent implantation via the brachial approach: a technique to reduce vascular bleeding complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;25:300–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy JW, and the Registry Committec of the Society for Cardiac Angiography: Complications associated with cardiac catheterization and angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1982;8: 5–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kern MJ, Cohen M, Talley JD, et al. Early ambulation after 5 French diagnostic cardiac catheterization: results of a multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:1475–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Klinke WP, Kubac G, Talibi T, Lee SJ. Safety of outpatient cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol 1985;56:639–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kussmaul WG, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, et al. Femoral artery hemostasis using an implantable device (Angio-Seal) after coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;37:362–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JC, Bengtson JR, Lipscomb J, et al. Feasibility and cost-saving potential of outpatient cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:378–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lotan C, Hasin Y, Mosseri M, et al. Transradial approach to coronary angiography and angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:164–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahrer PR, Young C, Magnusson PT. Efficacy and safety of outpatient cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1987; 13:304–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahrer PR, Eshoo N. Outpatient cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1981;7:355–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Murdock CJ, Davis MJ, Ireland MA, Platell M. Day case cardiac catheterization — a safe and economic alternative. Aust NZ J Med 1988;18:833–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Murray NH, Rothman MT. Day case cardiac catheterisation using the Sones technique. Int J Cardiol 1989;24:9–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Oehlert WH. Outpatient coronary arteriography. Oklahoma State Med Ass J 1981;74:314–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Keefe JH, Gernon C, McCallister BD, Ligon RW, Hertzer GO. Safety and cost-effectiveness of combined coronary angiography and angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991;122:50–4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oldroyd KG, Phadke KV, Philips R, Carson PH, Clarke M, Davis JA. Cardiac catheterisation by the Judkins technique as an outpatient procedure. Br Med J 1989;298:875–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pepine CJ, Allen HD, Bashore TM, for the ACC/AHA Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization. ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization laboratories. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:1149–82.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pink S, Fiutkowski L, Gianelly RE. Outpatient cardiac catheterization: analysis of patients requiring admission. Clin Cardiol 1989;12:375–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Skinner JS, Adams PC. Outpatient cardiac catheterization. Int J Cardiol 1996;53:209–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sones FM, Shirey EK. Cine coronary arteriography. Mod. Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1962;31:735–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Steffenino G, Dellavalle A, Ribichini F, et al. Ambulation three hours after elective cardiac catheterisation through the femoral artery. Heart 1996;75:477–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Talley JD, Mauldin PD, Kupersmith J. Economic and angiographic factors in determining optimal catheter size in performing outpatient left-sided heart and coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:374–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Talley JD, Joseph A, Kupersmith J. Outpatient left heart and coronary arteriography. The current practice at the University of Lousiville School of Medicine. J Kentucky Med Ass 1990;88: 488–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson RF, White CW. Coronary angiography. In: Willerson JT, Cohn JN, eds. Cardiovascular medicine. New York: Ch. Livingstone, 1995:390–464.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zimmerman HA, Scott RW, Becker NO. Catheterization of the left side of the heart in man. Circulation 1950;1:357–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heuser, R.R. Outpatient coronary angiography: Indications, safety, and complication rates. Herz 23, 21–26 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03043008

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03043008

Key Words

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation