Skip to main content
Log in

Prävalenz der vertebralen Wirbelkörperdeformationen bei Frauen und Männern in Deutschland

Prevalence of vertebral deformities in females and males in Germany

  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background: The prevalence of radiographically defined vertebral deformities, as a marker of vertebral osteoporosis, was calculated in a population based cross-sectional survey in Germany.

Method: Lateral spine X-rays were taken according to a standardized protocol and evaluated centrally. Three thousand nine hundred and eighty subjects (2064 male and 1916 female) aged 50 to 79 years, have been examined in 8 German centers.

Results: Based on McCloskey’s method of deformity definition the age-standardized mean prevalence of vertebral deformities in Germany was 10.2% for males and 10.5% for females. Based on the definition by Melton/Eastell as significant higher prevalence was calculated (males 17.8%, females 18.7%). The prevalence increased with age in both sexes with a steeper increase in females. There was no difference in East and West German populations. There were substantial variations between the centers regarding the prevalence of deformities in females and males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Bengner U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I. Changes in incidence and prevalence of vertebral fractures during 30 years. Calcif Tissue Int 1988;42:293–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein DS, Sadowsky N, Hegsted DM, Guri CD, Stare EJ. Prevalence of osteoporosis in high- and low-fluoride areas in North Dakota. JAMA 1966;198:499–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Consensus conference: Osteoporosis. JAMA 1984;252:799–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cummings SR. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. In: Genant HK, ed. Osteoporosis Update 1987. San Francisco: UCSF Printing Service, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O’Dowd KJ. Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev 1985;7:178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:207–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Felsenberg D, Gowin W, Diessel E, Armbrust S, Mews J. Recent developments in DXA: quality of new DXA/MXA-devices for densitometry and morphometry. Europ J Radiol 1995;20:179–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Felsenberg D. Differentialdiagnose osteoporotischer Wirbelkörperfrakturen. In: Ringe JD, Meunier PJ, Hrsg. Senile Osteoporse. Stuttgart: Thieme-Verlag, 1996:73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Felsenberg D, Kalender WA. Computerassisted morphometry of vertebral bodies. In: Vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. Genant HK, Jergas M et al., eds. San Francisco: UCSF-Print, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Felsenberg D. In: Metabolische Osteopathien. Seibel M, Stracke H, Hrsg. Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldsmith NF, Johnston JO, Picetti G, Garcia C. Bone mineral in the radius and vertebral osteoporosis in an insured population. J Bone Joint Surg 1973;55-A:1276–93.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gowin W, Müller C, Alenfeld F, Diessel E, Felsenberg D. Differential diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures/deformities. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11(Suppl):355.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gowin W, Diessel E, Mews J, Hoja T, Felsenberg D. Vertebral morphometry with DXA/MXA equipment — an equipment comparison. Dual X-ray absorptiometry/morphometric X-ray absorptiometry. Röfo 1997;166:140–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalidis L, Felsenberg D, Kalender WA, Eidloth H, Wieland E. Morphometric analysis of digitized radiographs: description of automatic evaluation. In: Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement II: 1992. Ring FFJ, ed. British Inst Radiol, 1992:14–6.

  15. Lutwag L, Whedon GD. Osteoporosis. DM Disease-amonth 1963:1–39.

  16. McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS et al. The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. Osteoporosis 1993;3:138–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Melton LJ III, Kann SH, Frye MA, Wahner HW, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:1000–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ, and the EVOS-Group: The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: The European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:1010–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pogrund H, Makin M, Robin G, Menczel J, Steinberg R. Osteoporosis in patients with fractured femoral neck in Jerusalem. Clin Ortop 1977;124:165–72.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. Medical Progress: Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1676–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wieland EU. Bestimmung der Wirbelkörpergeometrie zur Diagnose der Osteoporose. Freie Universität Berlin, 1993. Dissertation.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieter Felsenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Felsenberg, D., Wieland, E., Hammermeister, C. et al. Prävalenz der vertebralen Wirbelkörperdeformationen bei Frauen und Männern in Deutschland. Med Klin 93 (Suppl 2), 31–34 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03041996

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03041996

Key Words

Navigation