Skip to main content
Log in

Management der Chemotherapie-induzierten Emesis: Was ist Standard nach 20 Jahren klinischer Forschung?

Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: What is the standard after 20 years of clinical research?

Therapieempfehlungen auf der Basis einer Übersicht der publizierten Daten

  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Das Wissen um die Bedeutung, die pathophysiologischen Mechanismen und das Management der Chemotherapie-induzierten Emesis hat in den letzten 20 Jahren exponentiell zugenommen. In den achtziger Jahren wurde die hochdosierte Metoclopramid (MCP)-Therapie eingeführt, in den späten achtziger und frühen neunziger Jahren dann die Therapie mit Serotonin-Typ-3-Rezeptorantagonisten (5-HT3-Antagonisten). Beide Substanzklassen haben zu einer spürbaren Verbesserung der Ergebnisse antiemetischer Therapien beigetragen. Nach 20 Jahren intensiver klinischer Forschung scheint es angebracht, eine Zwischenbilanz zu ziehen.

Methodik: Mit Hilfe einer Übersicht und Re-Analyse der bis dato publizierten Literatur zu diesem Thema wird der aktuelle Stand der Forschung (inklusive der Felder, in denen weitere Verbesserungen notwendig sind) dargestellt. Dort, wo dieses möglich erscheint, werden Empfehlungen zum aktuellen „Goldstandard“ der antiemetischen Therapie formuliert.

Ergebnisse und Schlußfolgerungen: Bei allen hoch oder sehr hoch emetogenen Chemotherapien sollte am Therapietag eine antiemetische Prophylaxe eingesetzt werden. Dies gilt vor allem für alle Platin- und die meisten Cyclophosphamid-haltigen Therapien. Die Prophylaxe der Wahl besteht aus der Kombination eines 5-HT3-Antagonisten mit einem Corticosteroid. Gegen das sogenannte verzögerte Erbrechen an den Folgetagen sollten alle Patienten eine orale Corticoid-Therapie, eventuell in Kombination mit MCP (vor allem bei Platin-Therapie), seltener auch mit 5-HT3-Antagonisten erhalten. Mit dieser Prophylaxe können bei der Mehrzahl der Patienten die Emesis vollständig verhindert und die Nausea zumindest reduziert werden. Bei den 5-HT3-Antagonisten reicht eine Einmalgabe vor der Chemotherapie aus. Für Ondansetron und Granisetron, die am besten untersuchten Substanzen aus dieser Klasse, können 8 mg (Ondansetron) und 3 mg (Granisetron) als Standarddosis angesehen werden. Bei den Corticoiden liegen die meisten Daten für Dexamethason vor. Als Standarddosis können 10–20 mg vor der Chemotherapie gegeben werden. Nach der Chemotherapie und besonders an den Folgetagen scheint eine Mehrfachdosierung angezeigt.

Ausblick: Weitere Verbesserungen der Therapie, insbesondere bezüglich der Emesis und Nausea an den Folgetagen, sind notwendig und derzeit Objekt klinischer Forschung.

Summary

Background: The knowledge of the importance, the physiopathological mechanisms, and the management of the chemotherapy-induced emesis has increased exponentially during the last 20 years. High-dosage metoclopramide (MCP) therapy has been introduced in the eighties and serotonine type-3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3 antagonists) have been used since the late eighties and early nineties. Due to both classes of substances the results of the antiemetic therapies have improved drastically. After 20 years of intensive clinical research it seems to be appropriate to come to an intermediate conclusion.

Method: With the aid of an overview and a new analysis of the literature published on this topic so far, the current state of research is shown (including the fields in which further improvement will be necessary), and suggestions are made, wherever it seemed possible, to attain the “gold standard” in antiemetic therapy.

Results and Conclusions: In connection with all highly or very highly emetogenic chemotherapies, an antiemetic prophylaxis should be initiated on the day of therapy, especially when using platinum or most of the cyclophosphamide-based regimes for cancer treatment. The recommended prophylaxis consists of a combination of 5-HT3 antagonists with a corticosteroid. To combat the so-called delayed emesis on the days following therapy, all patients should undergo an oral corticoid therapy, possibly in combination with MCP (especially platinum-therapy patients), less frequently with 5-HT3 antagonists. With these means of prophylaxis emesis can be prevented/avoided completely in most patients, and nausea can at least be reduced. It is sufficient to administer a single dose of 5-HT3 antagonists prior to chemotherapy. For ondansetron and granisetron, the best documented substances within this class of drugs, 8 mg (ondansteron) and 3 mg (granisetron) are considered standard dosages. Among the corticoids, most data have been accumulated for dexamethasone. A standard dose of 10 to 20 mg can be administered prior to chemotherapy. Right after and especially on the days following chemotherapy higher dosages seem to be indicated.

Prospect: Further therapy improvements, especially concerning emesis and nausea on the days following chemotherapy, are necessary and are currently object of clinical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aasebo U, Slordal L, Prytz PS, Aarbakke J. High-dose metoclopramide and chlorpromazine in the treatment of cisplatin-induced emesis. Pharmacol Toxicol 1987;60: 337–339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Agostinucci WA, Gannon RH, Golub GR, Martin RS, Schauer PK, Dinonno EB. Continuous i.v. infusion versus multiple bolus doses of metoclopramide for prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Clin Pharmacy 1988; 7: 454–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn MJ, Lee JS, Lee KH, Suh C, Choi SS, Kim SHB. A randomized double blind trial of ondansetron alone versus in combination with dexamethasone versus in combination with dexamethasone and lorazepam in the prevention of emesis due to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 1991;17:150–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akhtar SS, Bano ZA, Bhat GM, Bhat MA. A double-blind randomized cross-over comparison of high-dose prochlorperazine with high-dose metoclopramide for cisplatin-induced emesis. Oncology 1991;48:226–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Alfieri AB, Cubeddu LX. Treatment with para-chlorophenylalanine antagonises the emetic response and the serotonin-releasing actions of cisplatin in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 1995;71:629–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony LB, Krozely MG, Woodward NJ et al. Antiemetic effect of oral versus intravenous metoclopramide in patients receiving cisplatin: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Clin Oncol 1986;4:98–103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baltzer L, Kris MG, Tyson LB, Rigas JR, Pisters KWM. The addition of ondansetron to the combination of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam did not improve vomiting prevention in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Cancer 1994;73:720–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Basurto C, Roila F, Bracarda S, Tonato M, Ballatori E, Del Favero A. A double-blind trial comparing antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of metoclopramide versus methyprednisolone versus domperidone in patients receiving doxorubicin chemotherapy alone or in combination with other antiblastic agents. Am J Clin Oncol 1988;11:594–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Basurto C, Roila F, Del Favero A, Ballatori E, Minotti V, Tonato M. A prospective randomized double-blind crossover study comparing the antiemetic activity of alizapride and metoclopramide in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. Cancer Invest 1988;6:475–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beck TM, Ciociola AA, Jones SE et al. Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:407–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beck TM, Hesketh PJ, Madajewicz S et al. Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1969–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Becouarn Y, Bui NB, David M, Lakdja F, Brunet R, Chauvergne J. Improved control of cisplatin-induced emesis with a combination of high doses of methylprednisolone and metoclopramide: a single-blind randomized trial. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1986;22:1421–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benrubi GI, Norvell M, Nuss RC, Robinson H. The use of methylprednisolone and metoclopramide in control of emesis in patients receiving cisplatinum. Gynecol Oncol 1985;21:306–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bleiberg H, Gerard B, Dalesio O, Crespeigne N, Rozencweig M. Activity of a new antiemetic agent: alizapride. A randomized double-blind crossover controlled trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1988;22:316–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bleiberg H, Spielmann M, Falkson G, Romain D. Antiemetic treatment with oral granisetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a dose-ranging study. Clinical Therapeutics 1995;17:38–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bleiberg H, Van Belle S, Paridaens R, De Wasch G, Dirix LY, Tjean M. Compassionate use of a 5-HT3-Receptor antagonist, tropisetron, in patients refractory to standard antiemetic treatment. Drugs 1992;43:Suppl:27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolis PF, Guaschino S, Paganelli AMM, Sampaolo. A comparison of droperidol and metoclopramide in the treatment of nausea and vomiting during cisplatinum polichemotherapy in ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Gyn Cancer 1981;11:57–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bonneterre J, Chevallier B, Metz R et al. A randomized double-blind comparison of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin or epirubicin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1063–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bosnjak SM, Neskovic ZB, Jovanovic-Micic DJ, Mitrovic LB, Radulovic SS. Single 8 mg dose of oral ondansetron failed to prevent FAC chemotherapy-induced acute nausea and vomiting. J Chemother 1996;8:315–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bountra C, Bunce K, Dale T et al. Antiemetic profile of a non-peptide neurokinin NK1 receptor antagonist, CP 99,994, in ferrets. Eur J Pharmacol 1993, 249:R3-R4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bregni M, Siena S, DiNicola M, Bonadonna G, Gianni AM. Tropisetron plus haloperidol to ameliorate nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose alkylating agent cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27:561–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bresciani G, Böhm S, Oriana S. Control of nausea and vomiting by granisetron in ovarian cancer patients treated with different cisplatin-based regimens. Tumori 1994;80:344–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bruntsch U, Drechsler S, Eggert J et al. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting by tropisetron (navoban) alone or in combination with other antiemetic agents. Semin Oncol 1994;21:7–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Buser KS, Joss RA, Piquet D et al. Oral ondansetron in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in women with breast cancer. Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Oncol 1993;4:475–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Campora E, Chiara S, Aschele C. Ondansetron for the control of dacarbazine-induced emesis. Eur J Cancer 1995;31:1720–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Campora E, Giudici S, Merlini L, Rubagotti A, Rosso R. Ondansetron and dexamethasone versus standard combination antiemetic therapy. A randomized trial for the prevention of acute and delayed emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin chemotherapy and maintenance of antiemetic effect at subsequent courses. Am J Clin Oncol 1994;17:522–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Campora E, Simoni C, Rosso R. Tropisetron verso ondansetron nelle prevenzione e controllo dell’ emesi in pazienti sottoposte a chemioterapia con FAC/FEC per carcinoma mammario metastatico o operato. Minerva Medica 1994;85:25–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Carmichael J, Philip PA, Forfar C, Harris AL. An open study to assess the safety, tolerance and pharmacokinetics of an intravenous infusion of granisetron given at 3 mg over 30 s in patients receiving chemotherapy for malignant disease. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995;37:134–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Carr BI, Bertrand M, Browning S et al. A comparison o the antiemetic efficacy of prochlorperazine and metoclopramide for the treatment of cisplatin-induced emesis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol 1985;3:1127–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chang T-C, Hsieh F, Lai C-H et al. Comparison of the efficacy of tropisetron versus a metoclopramide cocktail based on the intensity of cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996;37:279–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheirsilpa A, Sinlarat P, Lousoontornsiri W et al. Ondansetron: prevention of nausea & vomiting in cisplatin based chemotherapy. J Med Assoc Thai 1994;77:201–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chevalier-Evain V, Bonneterre J, Adenis A, Pion JM, Hecquet B. Loss of efficiency of ondansetron-dexamethasone during successive courses in female patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Bull Cancer 1994;81:219–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chevallier B on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group. Efficacy and safety of granisetron compared with high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin in a single-blind study. Eur J Cancer 1990;26:33–6.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chevallier B, Marty M, Paillarse JM, and the Ondansetron Study Group. Methylprednisolone enhances the efficacy of ondansetron in acute and delayed cisplatin-induced emesis over at least three cycles. Br J Cancer 1994;70:1171–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chiara S, Campora E, Lionetti R, Bruzzi P, Rosso R. Methylprednisolone for the control of CMF-induced emesis. Am J Clin Oncol 1987;10:264–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB et al. On the receiving end — patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemo-therapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1983;19:205–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cognetti F, Pinnaro P, Carlini P, Conti EM, Cortese M, Pollera CF. Randomized open cross-over trial between metoclopramide (MCP) and dexamethazone (DXM) for the prevention of cicplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1984;20:183–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Crucitt MA, Hyman W, Grothe T et al. Efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron versus prochlorperazine in the prevention of emesis associated with cyclophosphamide-based chemo-therapy and maintenance of health-related quality of life. Clinical Therapeutics 1996;18:508–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cubeddu LX, Hoffmann IS, Fuenmayor NT, Finn AL. Antagonism of serotonin S3 receptors with ondansetron prevents nausea and emesis induced by cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy regimens. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1721–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cubeddu LX, Hoffmann IS, Fuenmayor NT, Finn AL. Efficacy of ondansetron (GR 38032F) and the role of serotonin in cisplatin- induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med 1990;322:810–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cubeddu LX, Pendergrass K, Ryan T et al. Efficacy of oral ondansetron, a selective antagonist of 5-HT3 receptors, in the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapies. Am J Clin Oncol 1994;17:137–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cunningham D, Dicato M, Verweij J et al. Optimum antiemetic therapy for cisplatin induced emesis over repeat courses: ondansetron plus dexamethasone compared with metoclopramide, dexamethasone plus lorazepam. Ann Oncol 1996;7:277–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cunningham D, Evans C, Gazet JC et al. Comparison of antiemetic efficacy of domperi-done, metoclopramide, and dexamethasone in patients receiving outpatients chemotherapy regimens. Br Med J 1987;295:250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cunningham D, Hawthorn J, Pople A et al. Prevention of emesis in patients receiving cytotoxic drugs by GR38032F, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Lancet 1987;1:1461–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cupissol DR, Serrou B, Caubel M. The efficacy of granisetron as a prophylactic anti-emesis and intervention agent in high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis. Eur J Cancer 1990;26:23–7.

    Google Scholar 

  46. D’Olimpio JT, Camacho F, Chandra P et al. Antiemetic efficacy of high-dose dexamethasone versus placebo in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 1985;3:1133–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dana BW, Everts EC, Dickinson D. Dexamethasone vs placebo for cisplatin-induced emesis. A randomized cross-over trial. Am J Clin Oncol 1985;8:426–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Dana BW, McDermott M, Everts E, Abdulhay G. A randomized trial of high dose bolus metoclopramide versus low-dose continuous infusion metoclopramide in the prevention of cisplatin induced emesis. Am J Clin Oncol 1987;10:253–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. David M, Durand M, Chauvergne J, Mauriac L, Bui BN, Hoerni B. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-FU (CMF)-induced nausea and vomiting: a controlled study with high-dose metoclopramide. Cancer Treat Rep 1984;68:921–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. De Haan LD, De Mulder PHM, Beex LVAM, Debruyne MJ, Challoner T, De Pauw BE. The efficacy of GR38032F, an antagonist of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) in the prophylaxis of cisplatin (CDDP)-induced nausea and vomiting. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1988; 24:1383–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. De Mulder PHM, Seynaeve C, Vermorken JB et al. Ondansetron compared with high-dose metoclopramide in prophylaxis of acute and delayed cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Ann Int Med 1990;113:834–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. De Witt R, Beijnen JH, van Tellingen O, de Boer-Dennert M, Verweij J. Pharmacokinetic profile and clinical efficacy of a once-daily ondansetron suppository in cyclophosphamide-induced emesis: a double blind comparative study with ondansetron tablets. Br J Cancer 1996;74:323–6.

    Google Scholar 

  53. De Witt R, Schmitz PIM, Verweij J et al. Analysis of cumulative probabilities shows that the efficacy of 5-HT3 antagonist prophylaxis is not maintained. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:644–51.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Depierre A, Lebeau B, D’Allens H, the French Pneumonology Group for Ondansetron. A comparison of ondansetron with alizapride plus methylprednisolone in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. Oncology 1992; 49:305–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Diaz-Rubio E, Gonzalez-Larriba JL, Rosell R et al. Randomized, double-blind cross-over study of acute cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting, comparing a new schedule of the combination of metoclopramide and methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone. Ann Oncol 1990;1:379–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. DiBenedetto J, Cubeddu LX, Ryan T et al. Ondansetron for nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Clinical Therapeutics 1995;17:1091–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dicato MA. Oral treatment with ondansetron in an outpatient setting. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:18–9.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Du Bois A, McKenna CJ, Andersson H et al. A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of ondansetron (GR38032F) plus dexamethasone with metoclo-pramide plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of nausea and emesis induced by carboplatin chemo-therapy. Oncology 1997;54:7–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Du Bois A, Meerpohl HG, Vach W, Kommoss FG, Fenzl E, Pfleiderer A. Course, patterns, and risk-factors for chemotherapy-induced emesis in cisplatin-pretreated patients: a study with ondansetron. Eur J Cancer 1992;28:450–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Du Bois A, Vach W, Cramer-Giraud U et al. Pattern of carboplatin-induced emesis. Anti-Cancer Drugs 1995;6:645–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Du Bois A, Vach W, Thomssen C, Karck U, Prömpeler H, Meerpohl HG. Comparison of the emetogenic potential between cisplatin and carboplatin in combination with alkylating agents. Acta Oncologica 1994;33:531–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Edge SB, Funkhouser WD, Berman AB et al. High-dose oral and intravenous metoclopramide in doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-induced emesis. A randomized double-blind study. Am J Clin Oncol 1987;10:257–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Esseboom EU, Rojer RA, Borm JJJ, van Eps LWS. Prophylaxis of delayed nausea and vomiting after cancer chemotherapy. Netherlands J Med 1995;47:12–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Ettinger DS, Eisenberg PD, Fitts D, Friedman C, Wilson-Lynch K, Yocom K. A double-blind comparison of the efficacy of two dose regimens of oral granisetron in preventing acute emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer 1996;78:144–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Falkson CI, Falkson HC. Antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron in patients failing previous antiemetic therapy. Oncology 1995;52:427–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Fernandez-Marcos A, Martin M, Sanchez JJ et al. Acute and anticipatory emesis in breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 1996;4:370–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Frustaci S, Grattoni E, Tumolo S et al. Randomized crossover antiemetic study in cisplatin-treated patients. Comparison between high-dose iv metoclopramide and highdose iv dexa-methasone. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1986;17:75–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Frytak S, Moertel G, O’Fallon JR et al. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol as an antiemetic for patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. A comparison with prochlorperazine and a placebo. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:825–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Gandara DR, Harvey WH, Monaghan GG, Perez EA, Hesketh PJ. Delayed emesis following high-dose cisplatin: a double-blind randomised comparative trial of ondansetron (GR38032F) versus placebo. Eur J Cancer 1993;29:35–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Garbe C, Drechsler S, Fiedler H et al. Dose comparison of tropisetron (navoban) 5 mg and 10 mg orally in the prophylaxis of dacarbazine-induced nausea and emesis. Semin Oncol 1994;21:12–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Gebbia V, Cannata G, Testa A et al. Ondansetron versus granisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Cancer 1994;74:1945–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Gebbia V, Testa A, Valenza R, Cannata G, Tirrito ML, Gebbia N. Oral granisetron with or without methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone in the management of delayed nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A prospective randomized trial. Cancer 1995;76: 1821–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Gordon CJ, Pazdur R, Ziccarelli A, Cummings G, Al-Sarraf M. Metoclopramide versus metoclopramide and lorazepam. Superiority of combined therapy in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer 1989;63:578–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Gralla RJ, Itri LM, Pisko SE et al. Antiemetic efficacy of high-dose metoclopramide: randomized trials with placebo and prochlor-perazine in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med 1981; 305:905–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Gralla RJ, Rittenberg C, Peralta M, Lettow L, Cronin M. Cisplatin and emesis: aspects of treatment and a new trial for delayed emesis using oral dexamethasone plus ondansetron beginning at 16 hours after cisplatin. Oncology 1996;53:Suppl:86–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Gridelli C, Incoronato P, Airoma G, Pepe R, Arpinelli F, Bianco AR. Ondansetron in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by carboplatin combination chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 1993;29:651–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Grunberg SM, Akerley WL, Krailo MD, Johnson KB, Baker CR, Cariffe PA. Comparison of metoclopramide and metoclopramide plus dexamethasone for complete protection. from cisplatinum-induced emesis. Cancer Invest 1986;4:379–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Grunberg SM, Ehler E, McDermed JE, Akerley WL. Oral metoclopramide with or without diphenhydramine: potential for prevention of late nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin. J Natl Cancer 1988;80:864–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Grunberg SM, Gala KV, Lampenfeld M et al. Comparison of the antiemetic effect of high-dose intravenous metoclopramide and high-dose intravenous haloperidol in a randomized double-blind crossover study. J Clin Oncol 1984;2:782–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Grunberg SM, Stevenson LL, Russell CA, McDermed JE. Dose ranging phase I study of the serotonin antagonist GR38032F for prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:1137–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Gumbart CH, Sorensen SH, Bickers JN. A comparison of metoclopramide vs. droperidol/phenobarbital for emesis induced by chemotherapy. Am J Med Sci 1987; 293:90–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Hainsworth J, Harvey W, Pendergrass K et al. A single-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron, a selective serotonin antagonist, with intravenous metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9:721–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Harman GS, Omura GA, Ryan K et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of single-dose and divided multiple-dose dolasetron for cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1996, 38:323–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Harvey VJ, Evans BD, Mitchell PLR et al. Reduction of carboplatin induced emesis by ondansetron. Br J Cancer 1991;63:942–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Heron JF, Goedhals L, Jordaan JP et al. on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group. Oral granisetron alone and in combination with dexamethasone: a double-blind randomized comparison against high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Ann Oncol 1994;5:579–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Herrstedt J, Hannibal J, Hallas J, Andersen E, Laursen LC, Hansen M. High-dose metoclo-pramide + lorazepam versus low-dose metoclopramide + lorazepam + dehydrobenzperidol in the treatment of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Ann Oncol 1991;2:223–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Herrstedt J, Sisgaard T, Boesgaard M, Jensen TP, Dombernowsky P. Ondansetron plus metopimazine compared with ondansetron alone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemo-therapy. N Engl J Med 1993:328: 1076–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Hesketh P, Navari R, Grote T et al. Double-blind, randomized comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron mesylate and intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of acute cisplatin-induced emesis in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:2242–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Hesketh PJ, Beck T, Uhlenhopp M et al. Adjusting the dose of intravenous ondansetron plus dexamethasone to the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy regimen. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:2117–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Hesketh PJ, Gandara DR, Hesketh AM et al. Dose-ranging evaluation of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron in patients receiving chemotherapy with doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide. Support Care Cancer 1996;4:141–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Hesketh PJ, Harvey WH, Harker WG et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:596–600.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Hesketh PJ, Murphy WK, Lester EP et al. GR 38032F (GR-C507/75): a novel compound effective in the prevention of acute cisplatin-induced emesis. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:700–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Hulstaert F, Van Belle S, Bleiberg H et al. Optimal combination therapy with tropisetron in 445 patients with incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2439–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research. Ondansetron + dexamethasone vs metoclopramide + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Lancet 1992;340:96–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research. Ondansetron versus granisetron, both combined with dexamethasone, in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Ann Oncol 1995;6: 805–10.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research. Difference in persistence of efficacy of two antiemetic regimens on acute emesis during cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1993;11: 2396–404.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research. Dexamethasone, granisetron, or both for the prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy for cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;332: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Jantunen IT, Flander MK, Heikkinen MI et al. Comparison of ondansetron with customary treatment in the prophylaxis of nausea and emesis induced by non-cisplatin containing chemotherapy. Acta Oncol 1993; 32: 413–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Jantunen IT, Muhonen TT, Kataja VV, Flander MK, Teerenhovi L. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the prophylaxis of acute vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy — a randomised study. Eur J Cancer 1993;29:1669–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Jones AL, Hill AS, Soukop M et al. Comparison of dexamethasone and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Lancet 1991;338: 483–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Jordan NS, Schauer PK, Schauer A et al. The effect of administration rate on cisplatin-induced emesis. J Clin Oncol 1985;3:559–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Joss RA, Bacchi M, Buser K et al. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is superior to ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis in chemotherapy-naive and previously treated patients. Ann Oncol 1994;5:253–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Kaizer L, Warr D, Hoskins P et al. Effect of schedule and maintenance on the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in acute and delayed nausea and emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:1050–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Khojasteh A, Sartiano G, Tapazoglou E et al. Ondansetron for the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin. A multi center dose-response study. Cancer 1990;66:1101–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Koo WH, Ang PT. Role of maintenance oral dexamethasone in prophylaxis of delayed emesis caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 1996;7:71–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Clark RA et al. Incidence, course, and severity of delayed nausea and vomiting following the administration of high-dose cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 1995;3:1379–84.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Clark RA, Tyson LB. Phase II trials of the serotonin antagonist GR38032F for the control of vomiting caused by cisplatin. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:42–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Clark RA, Tyson LB, Groshen S. Antiemetic control and prevention of side effects of anti-cancer with lorazepam or diphenhydramine when used in combination with metoclopraide plus dexamethasone. A double-blind, randomized trial. Cancer 1987;60:2816–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Tyson LB, Clark RA, Cirrinciione C, Groshen S. Controlling delayed vomiting: double-blind, randomized trial comparing placebo, dexamethasone alone, and metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:108–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Tyson LB et al. Improved control of cisplatin-induced emesis with high-dose metoclopramide and with combinations of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and diphen-hydramine. Results of consecutive trials in 255 patients. Cancer 1985;55:527–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Kris MG, Tyson LB, Clark RA, Gralla RJ. Oral ondansetron for the control of delayed emesis after cisplatin. Cancer 1992;70:1012–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Latreille J, Stewart D, Laberge F et al. Dexamethasone improves the efficacy of granisetron in the first 24 h following high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 1995;3:307–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Lee CW, Suh CW, Lee JS et al. Ondansetron compared with ondansetron plus metoclo-pramide in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. J Korean Med Sci 1994;9:369–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Leonardi V, Iannitto E, Meli M, et al. Ondansetron (OND) vs grantisetron (GRA) in the control of chemotherapy induced acute emesis: A multicentric randomized trial. Oncology Reports 1996;3:919–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Levitt M, Warr D, Yelle L et al. Ondansetron compared with dexamethasone and metoclopramide as antiemetics in the chemotherapy of breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1081–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Lim AKH, Haron MR, Yap TM. Ondansetron against metoclopramide/dexamethasone. A comparative study. Med J Malaysia 1994;49:231–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Longo DL, Wesley M, Howser D, Hubbard SM, Anderson T, Young RC. Results of a randomized double-blind crossover trial of scopolamine versus placebo administered by transdermal patch for the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer Treat Rep 1982;66:1975–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Louvet C, Lorange A, Letendre F et al. Acute and delayed emesis after cisplatin-based regimen: description and prevention. Oncology 1991;48:392–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Madej G, Krzakowski M, Pawinski A, Lasota W, Rogowski W, Skoneczna I. A comparative study of the use of tropisetron (ICS 205-930), a 5-HT3 antagonist, versus a standard antiemetic regimen of dexamethasone and metoclopramide in the treatment of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Drug Invest 1993;6:162–9.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Maisano R, Adamo V, Settineri N, Pergolozzi S, Scimone A, Altavilla G. Efficacy of two oral dose regiments of granisetron. Anticancer Res 1995;15:2287–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Mantovani G, Maccio A, Bianchi A et al. Comparison of granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin for the treatment ofhead and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 1996;77:941–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K, Kulp B, Peterson G, Belinson J. Control of carboplatin-induced emesis with a fixed low dose of granisetron (0,5 mg) plus dexamethasone. Gyn Oncol 1996;60:435–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Marschner NW, Adler M, Nagel GA, Christmann D, Fenzl E, Upadhyaya B. Double-blind randomised trial of the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ondansetron and metoclopramide in advanced breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:1137–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Martin M, Aranda E, Diaz-Rubio E et al. Emetic control in breast cancer patients receiving i.v. CMF: results of two consecutive studies using a new method of assessment. Oncology Reports 1996;3:115–21.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Martin M, Diaz-Rubio E, Sanchez A, Almenarez J, Lopez-Vega JM. The natural course of emesis after carboplatin treatment. Acta Oncol 1990;29:593–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Martin-Jiminez M, Diaz-Rubio E. Antiemetic combination for cisplatin-induced emesis. Results from a controlled study. Bull Cancer (Paris) 1986;73:294–8.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Martin-Jiminez M, Diaz-Rubio Garcia E. Curso espontaneo de la emesis inducida por cisplatino y evaluacion preliminar de metoclopramina en bajas dosis intravenosas. Oncologia 1985;9:223–8.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Martin Jiminez M, Diaz-Rubio E, Blazques EJC et al. Tolerancia, toxicidad y aceptacion del tratamiento quimioterapico adyuvante FAC (5-fluorouracilo, adriamicina y ciclofosfamida) en el cancer de mama. Analisis de 100 pacientes consecutivas. Neoplasia 1988;5:8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Martin-Jimenez M, Diaz-Rubio E, Larriba JLG, Sangro B. Antiemetic combination for PAC (cisplatin-adriamycin-cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy-induced emesis in ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaec Oncol 1987;2:98–102.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Martoni A, Angelelli B, Guaraldi M, Strocci E, Pannuti F. An open randomised cross-over study on granisetron versus ondansetron in the prevention of acute emesis induced by moderate dose cisplatin-containing regimens. Eur J Cancer 1996;32:82–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Marty M on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group. A comparative study of the use of granisetron, a selective 5-HT3 antagonist, versus a standart anti-emetic regimen of chlorpromazine plus dexamethasone in the treatment of cytostatic-induced emesis. Eur J Cancer 1990;26:28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Marty M, Droz JP, Pouillart P, Paule B, Brion N, Bons J. GR38032F, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, in the prophylaxis of acute cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989;23:389–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Marty M, Kleisbauer JP, Fournel P et al. Is navoban R (tropisetron) as effective as zofran R (ondansetron) in cisplatin-induced emesis? Anti-Cancer Drugs 1995;6:15–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Marty M, Pouillart P, Scholl S et al. Comparison of the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (serotonin) antagonist ondansetron (GR38032F) with high-dose metoclopramide in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. N Engl J Med 1990;322:816–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Mason BA, Dambra J, Grossman B, Catalano RB. Effective control of cisplatin-induced nausea using high-dose steroids and droperidol. Cancer Treat Rep 1982;66:243–5:

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Matsui K, Fukuoka M, Takada M et al. Randomised trial for the prevention of delayed emesis patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Br J Cancer 1996;73:217–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Meyer BR, O’Mara V, Reidenberg MM. A controlled clinical trial of the addition of transdermal scopolamine to a standard metoclopramide and dexamethasone antiemetic regimen. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:1994–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Morran C, Smith DC, Anderson DA, McArdle CS. Incidence of nausea and vomiting with cytotoxic chemotherapy: a prospective ranomised trial of antiemetics. Br Med J 1979;1:1323–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Mughal TI. Efficacy of ondansetron and lorazepam in controlling emesis associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Acta Oncol 1994;33:537–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Navari R, Gandara D, Hesketh P et al. Comparative clinical trial of granisetron and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced emesis. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1242–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Navari RM, Kaplan HG, Gralla RJ, Grunberg SM, Palmer R, Fitts D. Efficacy and safety of granisetron, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by high-dose cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2204–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Navari RM, Madajewicz S, Anderson N et al. Oral ondansetron for the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis: a large, multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparative trial of ondansetron versus placebo. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:2408–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Navari RM, Province WS, Perrine GM, Kilgore Jr. Comparison of intermittent ondansetron versus continuous infusion metoclopramide used with standard combination antiemetics in control of acute nausea induced by cisplatin chemotherapy. Cancer 1993;72:583–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Ohmatsu H, Eguchi K, Shinkai T et al. A randomized cross-over study of high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone in patients receiving chemotherapy with high-dose cisplatin. Jpn J Cancer 1994;85:1151–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Ohwada M, Suzuki M, Ogawa S, Tamada T, Sato I. Efficacy and tolerability of granisetron with betamethasone, an antiemetic combination, in gynecologic cancer patients receiving cisplatin. Current Therapeutic Research 1995;56:1059–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Olver N, Craft PS, Clingan PR et al. An open multicentre study of tropisetron for cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. MJA 1996;164:337–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Onsrud M, Moxnes A, Sollien A, Grande T, Solesvik O. High-dose versus low-dose metoclopramide in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. A randomized crossover study in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 1988;61:2429–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Ossi M, Anderson E, Freeman A. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis. Oncology 1996;53:Suppl:78–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Parikh PM, Charak BS, Banavali SD et al. A prospective, randomized double-blind trial comparing metoclopramide alone with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in preventing emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin. Cancer 1988;62:2263–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Passalaqua R, Cocconi G, Bella M, et al. Double-blind, randomized trial for the control of delayed emesis in patients receiving cisplatin: comparison of placebo vs. adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Ann Oncol 1992;3:481–5.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Perez EA, Navari RM, Kaplan HG et al. Efficacy and safety of different doses of granisetron for the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced emesis. Support Care Cancer 1996;5:31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Plezia PM, Alberts DS, Kessler JF, Berens PL, Chase JL, Roe DJ. Randomized crossover comparison of high-do-se intravenous metoclopramide versus a five-drug. antiemetic regimen. J Pain Symptom Manag 1990;5:101–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Pollera CF, Gianarelli D. Prognostic factors influencing cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer 1989;64:1117–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. Pollera CF, Nardi M, Marolla P, Calabresi F. Alizapride alone or alizapride-dexamethasone compared with metoclopramide-dexamethasone in patients at high risk of acute emesis after cisplatin. A randomized cross-over study. Acta Oncol 1991;30:725–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Pollera CF, Nardi M, Marolla P, Carlini P. A randomized trial comparing alizapride alone or with dexamethasone vs a metoclopramide-dexamethasone combination for emesis induced by moderate-dose cisplatin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1987;19:335–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Pollera CF, Nadi M, Marolla P, Pinnaro P, Terzoli E, Giannarelli D. Effective control of CMF-related emesis with high-dose dexamethasone: results of a double-blind crossover trial with metoclopramide and placebo. Am J Clin Oncol 1989;12:524–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. Pronzato P, Ghio E, Losardo PL, Vaira F, Vigani A. Tropisetron-dexamethasone combination for carboplatin-induced emesis. Oncology Reports 1996;3:1179–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Rich WM, Abdulhayoglu G, Di Saia PJ. Methylprednisolone as an antiemetic during cancer chemotherapy — a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 1980;9:193–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Roila F, Basurto C, Bracarda S et al. A pilot study of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, diphenhydramine and lorazepam in prevention of nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients. Oncology 1990;47:415–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Roila F, Basurto C, Bracarda S et al. Double-blind crossover trial of single vs. divided dose of metoclopramide in a combined regimen for treatment of cisplatin-induced emesis. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:119–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Roila F, Basurto C, Minotti V, Ballatori E, Tonato M, Del Favero A. Methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide for precention of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide methotrexate 5-fluorouracil: a double-blind randomized study. Oncology 1988;45:346–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Roila F, Boschetti E, Tonato M et al. Predictive factors of delayed emesis in cisplatin-treated patients and antiemetic activity and tolerability of metoclopramide or dexamethasone. A randomized single-blind study. Am J Clin Oncol 1991;14:238–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Roila F, Bracarda S, Tonato M et al. Ondansetron (GR38032F) in the prophylaxis of acute and delayed cisplatin-induced emesis. Clinical Oncology 1990;2:268–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. Roila F, Tonato M, Basurto C et al. Protection from nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients: high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone and diphen-hydramine: a study of the Italian Oncology Group For Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:1693–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. Roila F, Tonato M, Basurto C et al. Antiemetic activity of two different high doses of metoclopramide in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: a randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. Cancer Treat Rep 1985;69:1353–985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. Roila F, Tonato M, Basurto C et al. Antiemetic activity of high doses of metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: a randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:141–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. Roila F, Tonato M, Basurto C, Minotti V, Ballatori E, Del Favero A. Double-blind controlled trial of the antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of methylprednisolone (MP), metoclopramide (MTC) and domperidone (DMP) in breast cancer patients treated with i.v. CMF. Eur J Cancer 1987;6:615–7.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Roila F, Tonato M, Cognetti F et al. Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: a double-blind multicenter randomized crossover study coparing ondansetron and ondansetron plus dex-methasone. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9:675–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Rosenblatt E, Lev LM, Robinson E. High-dose dexamethasone and high.dose metoclopramide versus high.dose dexamethasone and sulpiride in the management of cisplatin-induced emesis. Oncology 1988; 45:297–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. Ruff P, Paska W, Goedhals L et al. Ondansetron compared with granisetron in the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced acute emesis: a multicentre double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study. Oncology 1994;51:113–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Saller R, Hellenbrecht D. Comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of two high-dose benzamides, metoclopramide and alizapride, against cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer Treat Rep 1985;69:1301–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Schallier D, Van Belle S, De Greve J, Willekens A. Methylprednisolone as an antiemetic drug. A randomized double blind study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1985;14:235–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Sekine I, Nishiwaki Y, Kakinuma R et al. A randomized cross-over trial of granisetron and dexamethason versus granisetron alone: the role of dexamethasone on day 1 in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1996;26:164–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Shinkai T, Saijo N, Eguchi K et al. Antiemetic efficacy of high-dose intravenous metoclo-pramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1986;16:279–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  175. Shinkai T, Saijo N, Eguchi K et al. Control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis with metoclopramide and dexamethasone: a randomized controlled trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1989;19:40–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. Silva RR, Bascioni R, Giorgi F et al. Granisetron plus dexamethasone in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: evaluation of activity during three consecutive courses of chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 1996;4:287–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. Silvey L, Carpenter JT, Wheeler RH, Lee J, Conolley C. A randomized comparison of haloperidol plus dexamethasone versus prochlorperazine plus dexamethasone in preventing nausea and vomiting in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1988;6:1397–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. Smith DB, Newlands ES, Spruyt OW et al. Ondansetron (GR38032F) plus dexamethasone: effective anti-emetic prophylaxis for patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 1990;61:323–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. Smith DB, Rustin GJS, Howells N, Lambert HE, McQuade B. A phase II study of ondansetron as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving carboplatin for advanced ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 1991;2:607–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  180. Smith IE on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group. A comparison of two dose levels of granisetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic cytostatic chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 1990;26:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Sorbe B, Andersson H, Schmidt M et al. Tropisetron (navoban) in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting — the Nordic experience. Support Care Cancer 1994;2:393–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. Sorbe B, Hallen C. Betamethasone-dixyrazine versus betamethasone-metoclopramide as antiemetic treatment of cisplatin- doxorubicin-induced nausea in ovarian carcinoma patients. Eur J Gynaec Oncol 1991;1:31–6.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Sorbe B, Högberg T, Himmelmann A et al. Efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron in comparison with a combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone in the control of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:629–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  184. Sorbe BG, Högbert T, Glimelius B et al. A randomized, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron, a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, with a metoclopramide- containing antiemetic cocktail in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer 1994;73:445–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  185. Soukop M on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group. A dose-finding study of granisetron, a novel antiemetic, in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Support Care Cancer 1994;2:177–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Soukop M, McQuade B, Hunter E et al. Ondansetron compared with metoclopramide in the control of emesis and quality of life during repeated chemotherapy for breast cancer. Oncology 1992;49:295–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. Sridhar KS, Donnelli E. Combination antiemetics for cisplatin chemotherapy. Cancer 1988;61:1508–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  188. Stephens SH, Silvey VL, Wheeler RH. A randomized, double-blind comparison of the antiemetic effect of metoclopramide and lorazepam with or without dexamethasone in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Cancer 1990;66:443–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. Stewart A, McQuade B, Cronje JDE et al. Ondansetron compared with granisetron in the prophylaxis of cyclophosphamide-induced emesis in out-patients: a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group study. Oncology 1995;52:202–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. Strum SB, McDermed JE, Liponi DF. High-dose intranenous metoclopramide versus combination high-dose metoclopramide and intravenous dexamethasone in preventing cisplatin-induced nausea and emesis: a single-blind crossover comparison of antiemetic efficacy. J Clin Oncol 1985;3:245–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  191. Strum SB, McDermed JE, Pileggi J, Riech LP, Whitaker H. Intravenous metoclopramide: prevention of chemotherapy-induced nauseaand vomiting. A preliminary evaluation. Cancer 1984;53:1432–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  192. Stuart-Harris R, Buckman R, Starke I, Wiltshaw E. Chlorpromazine, placebo and droperidol in the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with cisplatin therapy. Postgraduate Med J 1983;59:500–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. Tan EH, Ang PT, Khoo KS. Control of emesis by intravenous granisetron in breast cancer patients treated with 5-FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Support Care Cancer 1994;2:197–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  194. Tremont-Lukats IW, Teixeira GM. Comparison of granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin for the treatment of head and neck cancer. A randomized controlled trial. Cancer 1996;78:2450–1.letter.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  195. Tsavaris N, Charalambidis G, Ganas N et al. Ondansetron versus metoclopramide as antiemetic treatment during cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A prospective study with special regard to electrolyte imbalance. Acta Oncol 1995;34:243–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  196. Tsavaris N, Charalambidis G, Pagou M et al. Comparison of ondansetron (GR 30832F) versus ondansetron plus alprazolam as antiemetic prophylaxis during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 1994;17:516–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. Tsavaris N, Mylonakis N, Bacoyiannis CH et al. Efficacy of ondansetron treatment with different timing schedules: a randomized double-blind study. Oncology 1995;52:315–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  198. Tsavaris NB, Tsaroucha-Noutsou E, Karvounis N, Bacoyannis C, Pagou M, Kosmidis P. Comparison of different schedules of ondansetron (GR 38032F) administration during cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a randomized trial. Chemotherapy 1995;41:70–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  199. Tsukuda M, Furukawa S, Kokatsu T, Enomota H, Kubota A, Furukawa M. Comparison of granisetron alone and granisetron plus hydroxyzine hydrochloride for prophylactic treatment of emesis induced by cisplatin chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 1995;31A:1647–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. Van Belle SJP, Stamatakis L, Bleiberg H, Cocquyt VFJ, Michel J, de Bruijn KM. Dose-finding study of tropisetron in cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Ann Oncol 1994;5:821–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Warr D, Wilan A, Venner P et al. A randomised, double-blind comparison of granisetron with high-dose metoclopramide, dexamethasone and diphenhydramine for cisplatin-induced emesis. Eur J Cancer 1993;29:33–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. Warr D, Willan A, Fine S et al. Superiority of granisetron to dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:1169–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Weitere Literatur zum Management der Chemotherapie-induzier ten Emens

  • Aapro MS, Alberts DS (1981) High-dose dexamethasone for prevention of cis-platio-induced romiting. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 7: 11–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aapro MS, Plezia M, Alberts DS, et al. (1984). Double-blind crossover study of the antiemetic efficacy of high-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose metoclopramide. J Clin Oncol 2: 466–471

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams M, Kerby IJ, Johansen K., Franks CR (1987). Carboplatin (paraplatin) clinical trials: assessment of nausea and vomiting. Proc 14th Int Cancer Congress 9: 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams M, Kerby J, Rocker J, et al. (1989). A comparison of the toxicity and efficacy of cisplatin and carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer. Acta Oncol 28: 57–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Addelman M, Erlichman C, Fine S, Warr D, Murray C (1990) Phase I/II Trial of granisetron: a novel 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Clin Oncol 8:337–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allan SG, Smyth JF (1987). Small intestine mucosal toxicity of cis-platinum — comparison of toxicity with platinum analogues and dexamethasone. Br J Cancer 53:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • American Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (1956). Current status of therapy of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. JAMA 160:208–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews PLR (1995). Votrag: Plasticity of the emetic reflex. Oxford 27.–29.3.1995: Serotonin and the control of emesis: a decade of progress? (pers. Mitteilung)

  • Andrews PLR, Bingham S, Davis CJ (1985). Retching evoked by stimulation of abdominal vagal afferents in the anaesthesied ferret. J Physiol 358: 103P

  • Andrews PLR, Davidson HIM (1990). Activation of vagal afferent terminals by 5-hydroxytryptamine is mediated by the 5-HT3 receptor in the anaesthetized ferret. J Physiol 422: 92P

  • Andrews PLR, Davis CJ (1993). The mechanism of emesis induced by anti-cancer therapies. In: Emesis in anti-cancer therapy. Andrews PLR., Sanger GJ (eds.), Chapman & Hall, London, pp 113–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews PLR, Davis CJ, Bingham S, Davidson HIM, Hawthorn J, Maskell L (1990). The abdominal visceral innervation and the emetic reflex: pathways, pharmacology, and plasticity. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 68: 325–345

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews PLR, Davis CJ, Grahame-Smith DG, Leslie RA (1987). Increase in 3[H]-2-deoxyglucose uptake in the ferret area postrema produced by apomorphine administration or electrical stimulation of the abdominal vagus. J Physiol 382:188

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews PLR, Hawthorn J (1988). The neurophysiology of vomiting. Bailliere’s Clinical gastroenterology 2: 141–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrykowski MA (1986). Definitional issues in the study of anticipatory nausea in cancer chemo-therapy. J Behav Med 9:33–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bard P, Woolsey CW, Snider RS, Mountcastle VB, Bromley RB (1947). Delimination of central nervous mechanisms involved in motion sickness. Fed Proc 6: 72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes JM, Barnes NM, Costall B, Naylor RJ, Tattersall FD (1988). Reserpine, para-chloropheny-lalanine and fenfluramine antagonise cisplatin-induced emesis in the ferret. Neuropharmacology 27: 783–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck TM (1995). The puttern of emesis following high-dose cyclophosphamide and the anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron. Anti-Cancer Drugs 6: 237–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck TM, Ciociola AA, Jones SE, et al. (1993). Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med 118: 407–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaccini G (1960). Tissue 5-hydroxytryptamine and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid after partial or total removal of the gastro-intestinal tract in the rat. J Physiol 153: 239–249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaccini G, Chieppa S (1960). Urinary excretion of 5-hydroxyindole-acetic acid after removal of the large intestine in man. Lancet 278: 881 (letter)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari P, Gupta YK, Seth SD, Chug A (1989). Cisplatin-induced emesis: effect of chemoreceptor trigger zone ablation in dogs. Asi Pacific J Pharmacol 4: 209–211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JF, Matthews JP, Wolf MM, et al. (1992). A randomised trial of dexamethasone, lorazepam and prochlorperazine for emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 28: 47–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JF, Wolf M, Matthews JP, et al. (1987). Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study comparing prochlorperazine and lorazepam with high-dose metoclopramide and lorthe azepam for the control of emesis in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep 71: 1007–1011

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw LA, Grundy D, Scratcherd T (1987). Vagal afferent discharge from gastric mechanore-ceptors during contraction and relaxation of the ferrest corpus. J Autonom Nerv Sys 18: 19–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borison HL (1957). Site of emetic action of X-radiation in the cat. J Comparative Neurol 107: 439–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borison HL, Wang SC (1949). Functional localization of central coordinating mechanism for emesis in cat. J Neurophysiol 12: 305–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borison HL, Wang SC (1953). Physiology and pharmacology of vomiting. Pharmacology Reviews 5: 193–230

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley PB, Engel G, Feniuk W, et al. (1986). Proposals for the classification and nomenclature of functional receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine. Neuropharmacology 25: 563–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer K, Uhlenbusch R (1991). Vergleich der antiemetischen Wirksamkeit von Granisetron und Alizapride plus Dexamethason bei Zytostatikatherapie. Dtsch Med Wschr 116: 1817–1823

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain RT, Butler A, Coates IH, et al. (1987). GR 38032F, a novel selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 90: 87P

  • Brizze KR, Mehler WR (1986). The central nervous connections involved in the vomiting reflex. In: Nausea and vomiting: mechanisms and treatment. Davis CJ, Lake-Bakaar GV, Grahame-Smith DG (eds.). Springer Verlag, Berlin. pp 31–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Brizzee KR (1956). Effect of localized brain stemm lesions and supradiaphragmatic vagotomy on X-radiation emesis in the monkey. Am J Physiol 187: 567–570

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browning J, North R, Hayward P, Mantell C, Cuttance P (1991). Hyperemesis gravidarum: a particular problem for pacific islanders. N Zealand Med J 13: 480

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruntsch U, Drechsler S, Hiller E, et al. (1992). Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis in patients responding poorly to previous antiemetic therapy. Comparing tropisetron with optimised standard antiemetic therapy. Drugs 43: 23–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burish TG, Carey MP (1986). Conditioned aversive response in cancer chemotherapy patients: theoretical and developmental analysis. J Consult Clin Psychology 54: 593–600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael J, Cantwell BMJ, Edwards CM, Rapeport WG, Harris AL (1988). The serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist BRL 43694 and nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin. BMJ 297: 110–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassileth PA, Lusk EJ, Torri S, DiNubile N, Gerson SL. (1983). Antiemetic efficacy of dexamethasone therapy in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Arch Intern Med 143: 1347–1349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci F, Cangiano C, Cascino A, et al. (1986). 5-hydroxytryptophan administration and anorexia in hyperphagic overweight patients. In: Progress in tryptophan and serotonin research 1986. Bender DA, Joseph MH, Kochen W, Steinhart H (eds.). Walter de Gryter, Berlin. pp 265–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella DF, Pratt A, Holland JC (1986). Persistent anticipatory nausea, vomiting, and anxiety in cured Hodgkin’s disease patients after completion of chemotherapy. Am J Psychiatry 143: 641–643

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiara S, Campora E, Simoni C, Confalonieri M, Psilogenis M, Rosso R (1995). Prevention of delayed emesis with metoclopramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic cytotoxic treatment. Anticancer Research 15: 1597–1600

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiara S, Scarsi P, Campora E, Bruzzi P, Tatarek R, Rosso R (1984). Low-dose metoclopramide versus methylprednisolone in controlling chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting. Chemiotherapia 3: 333–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn HI, Wang SC (1954). Locus of emetic action following irradiation. Proc Soc Exper Biol Med 85: 472–474

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu EKW, Liang R, Lie A, Todd D, Chan TK (1994). Comparison of ondansetron with metoclopra-mide in the control of emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy used for lymphoma and leukaemia patients. Drug Invest 8: 104–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerico M, Bertetto O, Morandini MP, Cardinali C, Giaccone G (1993). Antiemetic activity of oral lorazepam in addition to methylprednisolone and metoclopramide in the prophylactic treatment of vomiting induced by cisplatin. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study with crossover design. Tumori 79: 119–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cocheton JJ, Guerre J, Pequinot H (1987). Histoire illustree de l’hepato-gastro-enterologie de l’Antiquite a nos jours. Les Editions Roger Dacosta, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Colls BM, Ferry DG, Gray AJ, Harvey VJ, McQueen EG (1980). The antiemetic activity of tetra-hydrocannabinol versus metoclopramide and thiethylperazine in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. NZ Med J 91: 449–451

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costall B, Domeney AM, Naylor RJ, Tattersall FD (1986). 5-hydroxytryptamine M-receptor antagonism to prevent cisplatin-induced emesis. Neuropharmacology 25: 959–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford SM, Buckman R (1986). Nabilone and metoclopramide in the treatment of nausea and vomiting due to cisplatinum: a double blind study. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother 3: 39–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis VE, Brown H, Huff JA, Cashaw JL (1967). The alteration of serotonin metabolism to 5-hydroxytryptophol by ethanol ingestion in man. J Lab Clin Med 69: 132–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davison JS (1986). Activation of vagal gastric mechanoreceptors by cholecystokinin. Proc Western Pharmacol Soc 29: 363–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong J, Neuschwander H, Cavalli F, Bonollo L, Martini A (1989). A randomized crossover clinical study on the effectiveness of l-sulpiride in the prevention of nausea and emesis induced by antiblastic chemotherapy. Curr Ther Res 46: 974–979

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire AJ, Ferguson KJW (1938). Studies on the vomiting reflex in cats and dogs. Am J Physiol 123: 52–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogliotti L, Faggiuolo R, Berruti A, Antonacci RA, Ortega C, Lancranjan I (1990). Prevention of nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients by a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, ICS 205-930. Tumori 76: 595–598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donati D, Santini A, Gilli G, Indelli M, Marzola M, Malcarne P (1989). Low vs conventional dose of methylprednisolone in control of 4′-epidoxorubicin emesis. A randomized trial. Proc ECCO 5: P-0544

  • Du Bois A, Kriesinger-Schroeder H, Meerpohl HG, Pfleiderer A (1996). The role of serotonin as a mediator of emesis induced by inner ear dysfunction, pregnancy or cisplatin therapy. In: DJM Reynolds, PLR Andrews, CJ Davis (eds.). SErotonin and the scientific basis of antiemetic therapy. Oxford Clinical Communications, Oxford, p245 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois A, Meerpohl HG, Siebert C, Berek JS, Pfleiderer A (1992). Excretion patterns of 5-HIAA under platinum-based chemotherapy: the role of 5-HT in drug-induced emesis. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 11, San Diego 1992, 381 (Abstr.)

  • Du Bois A, Meerpohl HG, Wilhelm C, Quaas L, Barnickel I, Pfleiderer A (1990). Therapierefraktäre Emesis unter Cisplatin. Prospektive Studie mit dem Serotonin-Rezeptor Antagonist GR 38032F. Onkologie 13: 364–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois A, Siebert C, Schäfer C, Kriesinger-Schroeder H, Meerpohl HG (1995). The role of serotonin as a mediator of emesis induced by different stimuli. Support Care Cancer 3: 285–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn L (1982). Nabilone: an effective antiemetic agent in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 9: 55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esparmer V, Ascro B (1952). Identification of enteramine, the specific hormone of the enterochromaffin cell system, as 5-hydroxytryptamine. Nature 169: 800–801

    Google Scholar 

  • Esparmer V, Testini A (1959). Observations on the release and turnover rate of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the gastrointestinal tract. J Pharmacol 11:618–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather DVI (1986). Mechanisms and treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. In: Nausea and vomiting: mechanisms and treatment. Davis CJ, Lake-Bakaar GV, Grahame-Smith DG (eds.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Fake CS, King FD, Sanger GJ (1987). BRL 43694: a potent and novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 91: 335P

  • Fedele P, Spina M, Valentini M, et al. (1995). Ondansetron versus granisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer 76: 535–536 (letter)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldberg W, Toh CC (1953). Distribution of 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin, enteramine) in the wall of the digestive tract. J Physiol 119: 352–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Florczyk AP, Schurig JE, Bradner WT (1982). Platin-induced emesis in the ferret:a new animal model. Cancer Treat Rep 66: 187–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fozard JR (1984). MDL 72222: a potent and highly selective antagonist at neuronal 5-hydroxy- tryptamine receptors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s ARch Pharmacol 326: 36–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fozard JR, Mobarok Ali ATM, Newgrosh G (1979). Blockade of serotonin receptors on autonomic neurones by (-)cocaine and some related compounds. Eur J Pharmacol 59: 195–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda H, Koga T (1991). The Botzinger complex as the pattern generator for retching and vomiting in the dog. Neurosci Res 12: 471–485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukui H, Yamamoto M, Ando T, Sasaki S, Sato S (1993). Increase in serotonin levels in the dog ileum and blood by cisplatin as measured by microdialysis. Neuropharmacology 32: 959–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddum JH, Picarelli ZP (1957). Two kinds of tryptamine receptors. Br J Pharmcol Chemother 12: 323–328

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagen M, Gochnour D, Young D, Gaginella T, Neidhart J (1984). A randomized trial of metoclopramide and a combination of dexamethasone and lorazepam for prevention of chemotherapy-induced vormiting. J Clin Oncol 2: 6967–6971

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandara DR (1991). Progress in the control of acute and delayed emesis induced by cisplatin. Eur J Cancer 27: 9–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandara DR, Harvey WH, Monaghan GG, et al. (1992). The delayed-emesis syndrome from cisplatin: phase III evaluation of ondansetron versus placebo. Semin Oncol 19: 67–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer A, Merger M, Kilbinger H (1993). Modulation by 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors of the release of 5-hydroxytryptamine from the guinea-pig small intestine. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 347: 137–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gershon MD, Takaki M, Tamir H, Branchek T (1985). The enteric neural receptor for 5-hydroxytryptamine. Experientia 41:863–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner HB (1960). Reaction to short-term radiation in man. Ann Rev Med 11: 389–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gez E, Ben-Yosef R, Catane R, Brufman G, Biran S (1989). Chlorpromazine and dexamethasone versus high-dose metoclopramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy, particularly cis-platinum: a prospective randomized crossover study. Oncology 46: 150–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gez E, Warner-Efraty E, Ben-Yosef R, et al. (1987). High-dose metoclopramide and dexamethasone as an antiemetic in outpatients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Oncology 44: 237–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golaszewski T, Kölbl H, Lahousen M, Staab HJ (1995). Granisetron, ein Antiemetikum für die Behandlung der Zytostatika-induzierten Emesis: Ergebnisse einer praxisorientierten Studie. Wien Klin Wochenschr 107: 613–621

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein D, Levi JA, Woods RL, Russell J, Morgan J, Kerestes Z (1989). Double-blind randomized cross-over trial of dexamethasone and prochlorperazine as anti-emetics for cancer chemotherapy. Oncology 46: 105–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon JC, Barefoot DS, Sarbin NS, Pinkus LM (1989a). 3H-Zacopride binding to 5-HT3 sites on partially purified rabbit enteric neuronal membrane. J Pharm Exp Ther 251: 962–968

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gralla RJ, Itri LM, Pisko SE, et al. (1981). Antiemetic efficacy of high-dose metoclopramide: randomized trials with placebo and prochlor-perazine in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med 305: 905–909

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gralla RJ, Rittenberg CN, Lettow LA, Peralta MG, Cronin MD (1995). A unique all-oral, single-dose, combination antiemetic regimen with high efficacy and marked cost saving potential. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 14: 1730 (Abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gralla RJ, Tyson LB, Bordin LA, et al. (1984). Antiemetic therapy: a review of recent studies and a report of a random assignment trial comparing metoclopramide with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Cancer Treat Rep 68: 163–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guedry FE jr, Stockwell CW, Norman JW, Owens GG (1971). Use of triangular waveforms of angular velocity in the study of vestibular function. Acta Otolaryngol 71: 439–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta YK, Bhandari P, Dhar A, Seth SD (1988). Effect of BRL 43694, a novel 5-HT-M receptor antagonist, on cisplatin-induced emesis in dogs and gastric stasis in rats. Ottawa Nov 1988: Symposium on nausea and vomiting. A multidisciplinary perspective. A16 (Abstr.)

  • Hacking A on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group (1992). Oral granisetron-simple and effective: a preliminary report. Eur J Cancer 28: 28–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamik A, Peroutka SJ (1989). Differential interactions of traditional and novel antiemetics with dopamine D2 and 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 24: 307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harding RK, Hugenholtz H, Keany M, Kucharczyk J (1985). Discrete lesion of the area postrema abolish radiation induced emesis in the dog. Neurosci Letters 53: 95–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher RA, Weiss S (1923). Studies on vomiting. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 22: 139–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heron JF (1995). Single-agent oral granisetron for the prevention of acute cisplatin-induced emesis: a double-blind, randomized comparison with granisetron plus dexamethasone and high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone. Semin Oncol 22 (suppl): 24–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins GA, Kilpatrick GJ, Bunce KT, Jones BJ, Tyers MB (1989). 5-HT3 receptor antagonists injected into the area postrema inhibit cisplatin-induced emesis in the ferret. Br J Pharmacol 97: 247–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland AC, Morrow GR, Bennett JM, Carnike Jr. CLM (1983). Oncologist’s views of cancer patient noncompliance. Am J Clin Oncol 6: 239–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer D, Clarke DE, Fozard JR, et al. (1994). International Union of Pharmacology classification of receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin). Pharmacol Rev 46: 157–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey PPA, Richardson BP (1989). Classification of 5-HT receptors and binding sites: an overview. In: Serotonin: actions, receptors, pathophysiology. Mylecherane EJ, Angus JA, de la Lande IS, Humphrey PPA (eds.). Macmillan Press, Houndsmill, 1989. pp 204–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland SJ, Tyers MB (1987). Pharmacological characterization of 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced depolarization of the rat isolated vagus nerve. Br J Pharmacol 90: 229–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin JA (1881). The pathology of seasickness. Lancet 2: 907–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1994). Ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in cisplatin-treated patients with ovarian cancer. Support Care Cancer 2: 167–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1995). Persistence of efficacy of three antiemetic regimens and prognostic factors in patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 13: 2417–2426

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean A, Tell F (1992). Cellular bases for a multifunctional role of nucleus tractus solitarii neurons. In: Mechanisms and control of emesis. Bianchi AL, Grelot L, Miller AD, King GL (eds.). Colloque INSERM/ John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. 223: 85–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Joss RA, Galeazzi RL, Bischoff AK, Pirovino M, Ryssel HJ, Brunner KW (1986). The antiemetic activity of high-dose alizapride and high-dose metoclopramide in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Clin Pharmacol Ther 39: 619–624

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joss RA, Richner J, Brunner KW, Rohrbach D (1988). BRL 43694: a novel antiemetic to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 80: 1340–1341 (letter)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenbach R (1891). Über Hyperemesis gravidarum. Z Geburtshilfe Gynaekol 21: 200

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamato T, Ito H, Nagakura Y, et al. (1992). Mechanisms of cisplatin- and serotonin (5-HT)3 receptor agonist-induced emesis in ferrets: effects of YM060 and section of vagus and greater splanchnic nerves. In: Mechanisms and control of emesis. Bianchi AL, Grelot L, Miller AD, King GL (eds.). Colloque INSERM/ John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. 223: 247–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick GJ, Jones BJ, Tyers MB (1989). Binding of the 5-HT3 ligand [3H]GR65630 to rat area postrema, vagus nerve and the brain of several species. Eur J Pharmacol 159: 157–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kris MG, Radford J, Pizo B, et al. (1996). Dose-ranging antiemetic trial of the NK-1 receptor antagonist CP-122, 721: a new approach for acute and delayed emesis following cisplatin. Proc Am Assoc Clin Oncol 15: 547 (abstr. 1780)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle JF, Kraus H, Kellum JM (1987). Serotonin release is mediated by muscarin receptors on duodenal mucosal cells. J Surg Res 43: 139–142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KY, Park HJ, Chey WY (1985). Studies of the mechanism of retching and vomiting in dogs. Dig Dis Sci 30: 22–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leibundgut U, Lancranjan I (1987). First results with ICS 205–930 (5-HT3 receptor antagonist) in prevention of chemo-therapy-induced emesis. Lancet May 23, 1987: 1198 (letter)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie RA (1986). Comparative aspects of the area postrema: fine structural considerations help to determine its function. Cell Molecul Neurobiol 6: 95–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie RA, Gwyn DG (1984). Neuronal connection of the area postrema. Fed Proc 43: 2941–2943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley CM, Bernard S, Fields SM (1989). Incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in the outpatient oncology population. J Clin Oncol 7: 1142–1149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lushbaugh CC (1969). Reflections on some recent progress in human radiobiology. Adv Radiat Biol 3: 227–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons AS, Petrucelli RJ (1978). Medicine: an illustrated history. Abrams Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Magendie F (1825). Precis elementaire de Physiologie. Mequignon-Marvis, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Makale MT, King GL (1993). Plasticity of autonomic control of emesis in irradiated ferrets. Am J Physiol 265: R1092–1099

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malatesta MFD, Veneziano M, Fiorelli C, et al. (1995). Ondansetron in chemotherapy-induced emesis. Our experience. Eur J Gynaec Oncol 2: 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone JM, Christensen CW, Yashinsky D, Malviya VK, Deppe G (1990). Prochlorperazine and transdermal scopolamine added to a metoclopramide antiemetic regimen. A controlled comparison. J Reproduct Med 35: 932–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner NW, Adler M, Jänicke F, Nagel GA (1990). Langzeitergebnisse der antiemetischen Effektivität des 5-HT3-Antagonisten Ondansetron. Onkologie 13: 313–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy LE, Borison HL (1983). Animal modells for predicting antiemetic drug activity. In: Antiemetics and cancer chemotherapy, Lazlo J (ed.). Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1983, pp 21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy LE, Borison HL (1984). Cisplatin-induced vomiting eliminated by ablation of the area postrema in cats. Cancer Treat Rep 68: 401–408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehler WR (1983). Observations on the connectivity of the parvicellular reticular formation with respect to a vomiting center. Brain Behav Evolution 23: 63–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metz CA, Freedman RS, Magrina JF et al. (1987). Methylprednisolone in cisplatinum induced nausea and emesis: a placebo-controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol 27: 84–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milano S, Grelot L, Chen Z, Bianchi AL (1990). Vagal-induced vomiting in decerebrated cats is not suppressed by specific 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. J Autonom Nerv Syst 31: 109–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AD, Jakus J, Nonaka S (1994). Plasticity of emesis to a 5-HT3 agonist: effect of order of visceral nerve cuts. Neuroreport 5: 986–988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AD, Nonaka S (1992). Mechanisms of vomiting induced by serotonin-3-receptor agonists in the cat: effect of vagotomy, splanchniectomy or area postrema lesion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 260: 509–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AD, Wilson VJ (1983). “Vomiting centre” reanalyzed: an electrical stimulation study. Brain Res 270: 154–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miner WD, Sanger GJ (1986). Inhibition of cisplatin-induced vomiting by selective 5-hydrox-ytryptamine M-receptor antagonism. Br J Pharmacol 88: 497–499

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moertel CG, Reitemeier RJ, Gage RP (1963). A controlled clinical evaluation of antiemetic drugs. JAMA 186: 116–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Money KE, Cheung BS (1983). Another function of the inner ear: facilitation of the emetic response to poisons. Aviat Space Environ Med 54: 208–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow GR (1985). The effect of a susceptibility to motion sickness on the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 55: 2766–2770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navari RM (1989). Comparison of intermittent versus continuous infusion metoclopramide in control of acute nausea induced by cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 7: 943–946

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor RJ, Rudd JA (1992). Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced vomiting: involvement of 5-HT3 receptors. In: Mechanisms and control of emesis. Bianchi AL, Grelot L, Miller AD, King GL (eds.). Colloque INSERM/ John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. 223: 115–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niiranen A, Mattson K (1987). Antiemetic efficacy of nabilone and dexamethasone: a randomized study of patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 10: 325–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien MER, Cullen MH, Woodroffe C, et al. (1989). The role of metoclopramide in acute and delayed chemotherapy induced emesis: a randomised double blind trial. Br J Cancer 60: 759–763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paintal AS (1964). Effect of drugs on vertebrate mechanoreceptors. Pharmacol Rev 16: 159–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmeri S, Gebbia V, Valenza R, Testa A, Rausa L (1991). A randomized study on the antiemetic efficacy of levosulpride versus metoclopramide in patients with chemotherapy relating vomiting. Int J Exp Clin Chem 4: 114–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Penso G (1984). La Medicine Romaine. Les Editions Roger Dacosta, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Poka R, Hernadi Z, Juhasz B, Lampe L (1993). Comparison of four antiemetic regimes for the treatment of cisplatin-induced vomiting. Int J Gynecol Obstet 42: 19–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy M, Fennelly JJ, Towers M (1986). Prospective randomized double-blind trial of nabilone versus domperidone in the treatment of cytotoxic-induced emesis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 17: 285–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt GD, Bowery NG (1989). The 5-HT3 receptor ligand, [3H]BRL 43694, binds to presynaptic sites in the nucleus tractus solitarii of the rat. Br J Pharmacol 97: 414P

  • Rackè K, Schwörer H (1993). Characterization of the role of calcium and sodium channals in the stimulus secretion coupling of 5-hydroxytryptamine release from porcine enterochromaffine cells. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 347: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackè K, Schwörer H, Agostini DV, Kilbinger H (1991). Evidence that neuronally released vasoactive intestinal polypeptide inhibits the release of serotonin from enterochromaffine cells of the guinea pig small intestine. Acta Endocrinologica 124: 203–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rackè K, Schwörer H, Kilbinger H (1990). Effects of the benzodiazepine receptor agonist midozalam and antagonist flumazil on 5-hydroxytryp-tamine release from guinea-pig intestine in vitro. Naunyn Schmiedebergs’s Arch Pharmacol 341: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport MM (1949). Serum vasoconstrictor (serotonin). V. The presence of creatinine in the complex. A proposed structure of the vasoconstrictor principle. J Biol Chem 180: 961–969

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscroft M, Wells U, Bhandari P, Andrews PLR (1992). Agonist evidence for the involvement of 5HT3 receptors in emesis in the ferret. In: Mechanisms and control of emesis. Bianchi AL, Grelot L, Miller AD, King GL (eds.). Colloque INSERM/ John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. 223: 251–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (1978). Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model. J R Soc Med 71: 819–829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regidor PA, Nelken M, Regidor M, Bier U, Oberhoff C, Schindler AE (1996). Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von Navoban (5HT3-Rezeptor Antagonist Tropisetron) zur Prävention der zytostatikainduzierten Nausea und Emesis bei Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinomen und gynäkologischen Malignomen. Zentralbl Gynakol 118: 148–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JM, Leslie RA, Grahame-Smith DG, Harvey JM (1989). Localization of 5-HT3 receptor binding sites in human dorsal vagal complex. Eur J Pharmacol 174: 127–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson BP, Engel G, Donatsch P, Stadler PA (1985). Identification of 5-hydroxytryptamine M-receptor subtypes and their specific blockade by a new class of drugs. Nature 316: 126–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg B (1985). Fundamental studies with cisplatin. Anticancer Chemotherapy 55: 2303–2316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth L, Daunderer M, Kormann K (1988). Giftpflanzen — Pflanzengift: Vorkommen — Wirkung — Therapie. Allergische und phototoxische Reaktionen. Ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Landsberg-München, 3. Aufl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rub R, Andrews PLR, Whitehead SA (1992). Vomiting: incidence, causes, ageing and sex. In: Mechanisms and control of emesis. Bianchi AL, Grelot L, Miller AD, King GL (eds.). Colloque INSERM/ John Libbey Eurotext 223: 363–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallan SE, Cronin C, Zelen M, Zinberg NE (1980). Antiemetics in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. A randomized comparison of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and prochlorperazine. N Engl J Med 302: 135–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanger GJ (1987). Increased gut cholinergic activity and antagonism of 5-hydroxytryptamine M-receptors by BRL 24924: potential clinical importance of BRL 24924. Br J Pharmacol 91: 77–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Sorbe B, Högberg T, et al. (1993). Efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron and dexa-methasone in the control of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin. Ann Oncol 4: 31–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwörer H, Rackè K, Kilbinger H (1991). Cisplatin increases the release of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) from the isolated vascularly perfused small intestine of the guinea pig: Involvement of 5-HT3 receptors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 344: 143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serve H, Perker M, Ertl A, Reichold M, Fink U, Berdel WE (1990). Ondansetron (GR 38032F), ein kompetitiver 5-HT3-Rezeptor-Antagonist als Antiemetikum bei Zytostatika-induzierter Übelkeit und Erbrechen. Eine offene, substanzorientierte Phase-II/III Studie. Onkologie 13: 369–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seynaeve C, de Mulder PHM, Lane-Allman E, van Liessum PA, Verweij J (1991). The 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron reestablishes control in refractory emesis induced by non-cisplatin chemotherapy. Clin Oncol 3: 199–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DB, Newlands ES, Rustin GJS, et al. (1991). Comparison of ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone as antiemetic prophylaxis during cisplatin- containing chemotherapy. Lancet 338: 487–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorbe B, Hallen C, Frankendal B (1994). An open, randomized study to compare the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron with that of a metoclopramide-containing antiemetic cocktail in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 33: 298–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soukop M (1996). Management of cyclophosphamide-induced emesis over repeat courses. Oncology 53: 39–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soukop M on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group (1990). A comparison of two dose levels of granisetron in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Eur J Cancer 26: 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables R, Andrews PLR, Bailey HE, et al. (1987). Antiemetic properties of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonist. GR 38032F. Cancer Treat Rev 14: 333–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JJ, Burks TF, Weistbrodt NW (1977). Intestinal myoelectric activity after activation of central emetic mechanisms. Am J Physiol 233: 131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoot JRR (1986). Mechanisms and treatment of motion sickness. In: Nausea and vomiting: mechanisms and treatment. Davis CJ, Lake-Bakaar GV, Grahame-Smith DG (eds.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 110–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Thumas LJ (1891). Über das Brechcentrum und über die Wirkung einiger pharmakologischer Mittel auf dasselbe. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Physiol 123: 44–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonato M on behalf of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (1991). Ondansetron plus dexamethasone: an effective combination in high-dose cisplatin therapy. Eur J Cancer 27: 12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonato M, Roila F, Del Favero A (1993). Methodology of antiemetic trials: A review. Ann Oncol 2: 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Torii Y, Saito H, Matsuki N (1991). Selective blockade of cytotoxic drug-induced emesis by 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in suncus murinus. Jpn J Pharmacol 55: 107–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson LB, Gralla RJ, Kris MG, Young CW, Clark RA (1989). Dose-ranging antiemetic trial of high-dose oral metoclopramide. Am J Clin Oncol 12: 239–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Belle SJB, Cocquyt VFJ, Bleiberg H, et al. (1995). Optimal combination therapy with navoban (tropisetron) in patients with incomplete control

  • Villalon AH, Alsay MN, Jiminez MV (1987). A randomized double blind cross-over study to compare clebopride with metoclopramide in CMF-induced emesis. Phil J Int Med 25: 61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt C, Hellenbrecht D, Saller R, Achert G, Brockmann P, Hausleiter H (1993). Oral medium-dosed metoclopramide versus placebo as highly effective antiemetic prophylaxis in inand outpatients on noncisplatin chemotherapy. Oncology 50: 81–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SC, Chinn HI (1956). Experimental motion sickness in dogs. Importance of labyrinth and vestibular cerebellum. Am J Physiol 185: 617–623

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SC, Chinn HI, Renzi AA (1957). Experimental motion sickness in dogs: role of abdominal visceral afferents. Report Nr 57–112, School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph AFB, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead SA, Andrews PLR, Chamberlain GVP (1992). Characterisation of nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy: a surve of 1000 women. J Obstet Gynecol 12: 364–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead VM (1975). Cancer treatment needs better antiemetics. N Engl J Med 293: 199–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilder-Smith CH, Schimke J, Osterwalder B, Senn HJ (1991). Cinnarizine for prevention of nausea and vomiting during platin chemotherapy. Acta Oncol 30: 731–734

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittchen HU, Saß H, Zaudig M, Koehler K (1991). Diagnostisches und statistisches Manual psychischer Störungen DSM-III-R. Beltz Verlag, Weinheim. 3. korr. Aufl., pp 99–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolkind S, Zajicek E (1978). Psycho-social correlates of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Psychosom Res 22: 1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wymenga ANM, van der Graaf WTA, Wils JA, et al. (1996). A randomized, double-blind, multicentre study comparing daily 2 and 5 mg of tropisetron for the control of nausea and vomiting induced by low-dose cisplatin- or non-cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 7: 505–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaglama NE, Rosenblum SL, Sartiano GP, Brady M, Gonzales MF, Valdivieso JG (1986). Single, high-dose intravenous dexamethasone as an antiemetic in cancer chemotherapy. Oncology 43: 27–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zambetti M, Bajetta E, Bidoli P, Verusio C (1985). Antiemetic activity of metoclopramide versus alizapride during cancer chemotherapy. Tumori 71: 609–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du Bois, A. Management der Chemotherapie-induzierten Emesis: Was ist Standard nach 20 Jahren klinischer Forschung?. Med Klin 93 (Suppl 1), 3–17 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03041988

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03041988

Schlüsselwörter

Key Words

Navigation