Skip to main content
Log in

How successful are CDCs? An interim response

  • Articles
  • Published:
The Review of Black Political Economy

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Thomas Vietorisz and Bennett Harrison, “Ghetto Development, Community Corporations, and Public Policy” inReview of Black Political Economy, Vol. 11, No. 1, (Fall 1971), p. 31.

  2. Frederick D. Sturdivant, “Community Development Corporations: The Problem of Mixed Objectives”, inLaw and Contemporary Problems, Vol. XXXVI, No. 1 (Winter 1971), pp. 48–49.

  3. J.A.C. Hetherington, “Community Participation: A Critical View”,ibid. inLaw and Contemporary Problems, Vol. XXXVI, No. 1 (Winter 1971) p. 28.

  4. Abt Associates, Inc., “An Evaluation of the Special Impact Program: Phase II Report”, Cambridge, Mass., March 1973, Contract No. B 00-5181.

  5. Corporation Income Tax Returns: 1968, Internal Revenue Service, U.S.-G.P.O., Washington, D.C., 1972, p. 14, column 1.

  6. Ibid. Corporation Income Tax Returns: 1968, Internal Revenue Service, U.S.-G.P.O., Washington, D.C., 1972, p. 14, column 1.

  7. Edward D. Hollander and others,The Future of Small Business, (N.Y. Frederick A. Praeger, 1967), pp. 106–107.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robert McClory, “Rough Times in Minority Business”,Race Relations Reporter, Nashville, Tenn., Vol. IV, No. 8, April 23, 1973, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas Vietorisz and Bennett Harrison,The Economic Development of Harlern, (N.Y. Praeger, 1970), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steadily increasing data support the idea that the U.S. economy operates in a dualistic fashion, especially perhaps with regard to labor. That is, there is a secondary labor market characterized by very different structure and opportunities, which limit the kinds of work available, its continuity, and its rates of pay. Particularly in such depressed, areas as those in which the CDCs operate, this secondary labor market is the one which most clearly accounts for the inability of local workers to find decent employment. See, for example, Michael J. Piore, “The Dual Labor Market: Theory and Implications”, in David Gordon, ed.,Problems in Political Economy: An Urban Perspective, (Lexington, Mass., D.C. Heath, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Statistical Abstract of the U.S. for 1972, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, 1971, Table No. 519.

  12. Barry A. Stein,Harlem Commonwealth Council: A Case Study in Community Business Development, Cambridge, Mass., Center for Community Economic Development, Forthcoming 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barry A. Stein,The Biggest Little Conglomerate in the World: Community Economic Development in Kentucky, Cambridge, Mass., Center for Community Economic Development, In press.

  14. Barry A. Stein, “Abt Evaluation Study”,Center for Community Economic Development Newsletter, Cambridge, Mass., March 1973, p. 3.

  15. That is, adjusted to reflect the different size of the sample in the separate CDCs. The figures so calculated more accurately represent the feeling of the total population surveyed.

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Stein, B.A. How successful are CDCs? An interim response. Rev Black Polit Econ 3, 82–99 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03040542

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03040542

Keywords

Navigation