Skip to main content

Prospects of monosodium glutamate use for enhancement of spinosad toxicity against codling moth neonates

Abstract

It was demonstrated that neonates of the codling moth,Cydia pomonella (L.), feed on ‘Red Delicious’ apple leaves and successfully molt to the second instar. Next, using a non-choice bioassay, we targeted codling moth neonates feeding on apple leaves, with standard concentrations of a culinary taste enhancer, monosodium glutamate (MSG), and Success®, which contains 22.8% spinosad as its active ingredient. The addition of 25 ppm MSG increased feeding by 20–30%. Stimulatory properties of MSG were preserved in the presence of 12.5 ppm Success, and mortality from a 12.5 ppm Success + 25 ppm MSG combination increased by factors of 3.1–1.6 compared with Success alone. In a field experiment without rain, MSG maintained its stimulatory properties for 24 h, increasing feeding by 37%. Consistently, without rain, MSG increased the toxicity of Success in the field by a factor of × 3.5. However, the stimulatory properties of MSG dropped to 19% with 4.3 mm of rain, and to zero with 9.6 mm of rain. Increased Success toxicity by MSG was reduced to × 1.6 with 4.3 mm of rain, and dropped to zero after 9.6 mm of rain. It is concluded that MSG seems to be a promising feeding stimulant, enhancing the toxic properties of Success which itself is a good candidate for codling moth control. However, field persistence of MSG needs to be improved, either by formulating the Success + MSG combination into some field-stable matrix, or by employing a sparingly water-soluble substance mimicking MSG’s action as a feeding stimulant in codling moth neonates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Allan, R.D., Hanrahan, J.R., Hambley, T.W., Johnston, G.A., Mewett, K.N. and Mitrovic, A.D. (1990) Synthesis and activity of a potent N-methyl-D-aspartic acid agonist, trans-1-aminocyclobutane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid, and related phosphonic and carboxylic acids.J. Med. Chem. 33: 2905–2915.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ascher, K.R.S., Meisner, J. and Flowers, H.M. (1976) Effects of amino acids on the feeding behavior of the larva of the Egyptian cotton leafworm,Spodoptera littoralis Boisd.Phytoparasitica 4: 85–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bachmanov, A.A., Tordoff, M.G. and Beauchamp, G.K. (2000) Intake of umami-tasting solutions by mice: a genetic analysis.J. Nutr. 130: 935S-941S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartelt, J.R., McGuire, M.R. and Black, D.A. (1990) Feeding stimulants for the European corn borer (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae): additives to a starch-based formulation forBacillus thuringiensis. Environ. Entomol. 19: 182–189.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bell, M.R. and Romine, C.L. (1980) Tobacco budworm field evaluation of microbial control in cotton usingBacillus thuringiensis and nuclear polyhedrosis virus, with a feeding adjuvant.J. Econ. Entomol. 73: 427–430.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brownbridge, M. (1993) Feeding stimulation inChilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae by some commonly available sugars and its effect on larval mortality caused byBacillus thuringiensis (Berliner).Insect Sci. Appl. 14: 465–470.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charmillot, P.-J., Hofer, D. and Pasquier, D. (2000) Attract and kill: a new method for control of the codling mothCydia pomonella. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 94: 211–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Curtis, C.E., Clark, J.D. and Tebbets, J.S. (1991) Incidence of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in packed nectarines.J. Econ. Entomol. 84: 1686–1690.

    Google Scholar 

  9. El-Nockrashy, A.S., Salama, H.S. and Taha, F. (1986) Influence of bait formulations on the effectiveness ofBacillus thuringiensis againstSpodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lep., Noctuidae).J. Appl. Entomol. 101: 381–389.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elzen, G.W., Rojas, M.G., Elzen, P.J., King, E.G. and Barcenas, N.M. (1999) Toxicological responses of the boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) ectoparasitoidCatolaccus grandis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to selected insecticides.J. Econ. Entomol. 92: 309–313.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fier, D. and Beck, S.D. (1963) Feeding behaviour of the large milkweed bug,Oncopeltus fasciatus.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 56: 224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Food Quality Protection Act. http://www.epa.gov/oppfeadl/fqpa.

  13. Hafez, M., Salama, H.S., Abou-Elela, R.G. and Ragaei, M. (1987) Evaluation of adjuvants for use withBacillus thuringiensis againstHeliothis armigera (Hubn.).J. Appl. Entomol. 103: 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Halpern, B.P. (2000) Glutamate and the flavor of foods.J. Nutr. 130: 910S-914S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Howell, J.F., Knight, A.L., Unruh, T.R., Brown, D.F., Krysan, J.L., Sell, C.R. and Kirsch, P.A. (1992) Control of codling moth in apple and pear with sex pheromone-mediated mating disruption.J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 918–925.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson, D.M. (1979) Codling moth egg distribution on unmanaged apple trees.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72: 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson, D.R. (1982) Suppression ofHeliothis spp. on cotton by usingBacillus thuringiensis, Baculovirus heliothis, and two feeding adjuvants.J. Econ. Entomol. 75: 207–210.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meisner, J., Hadar, D., Wysoki, M. and Harpaz, I. (1990) Phagostimulants enhancing the efficacy ofBacillus thuringiensis formulations against the giant looper,Boarmia (Ascotis) selenaria, in avocado.Phytoparasitica 18: 107–115.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mertz, F.P. and Yao, R.C. (1990)Saccharopolyspora spinosa sp. Nov. isolated from soil collected in a sugar mill rum still.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 40: 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moffitt, H.R., Drake, S.R., Toba, H.H. and Hartshell, P.L. (1992) Comparative efficacy of methyl bromide against codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larvae in ‘Bing’ and ‘Rainier’ cherries and confirmation of efficacy of a quarantine treatment for ‘Rainier’ cherries.J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 1855–1858.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patneau, D.K., Mayer, M.L., Jane, D.E. and Watkins, J.C. (1992) Activation and desensitization of AMPA/kainate receptors by novel derivatives of willardiine.J. Neurosci. 12: 595–606.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Patti, J.H. and Carner, G.R. (1974)Bacillus thuringiensis investigations for control ofHeliothis spp. on cotton.J. Econ. Entomol. 67: 415–418.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Poullot, D., Beslay, D., Bouvier, J.-Ch. and Sauphanor, B. (2001) Is attract- and -kill technology potent against insecticide-resistant Lepidoptera?Pest Manage. Sci. 57: 729–736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sogawa, K. (1972) Studies on the feeding habits of the brown planthopper. III. Effects of amino acids, and other compounds on the sucking response.Jap. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 16: 1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sparks, T.C., Thompson, G.D., Kirst, H.A., Hertlein, M.B., Larson, L.L., Worden, T.V. and Thibault, S.T. (1998) Biological activity of the spinosyns, new fermentation derived insect control agents, on tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae.J. Econ. Entomol. 91: 1277–1283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sparks, T.C., Thompson, G.D., Larson, L.L., Kirst, H.A., Jantz, O.K., Worden, T.V., Hertelein, M.B. and Busacca, J.D. (1995) Biological characteristics of the spinosyns: a new class of naturally derived insect control agents.Proc. 1995 Beltwide Cotton Production Conf. (Memphis, TN, USA), pp. 903–907.

  27. Thompson, G.D., Busacca, J.D., Jantz, O.K., Kirst, H.A., Larson, L.L. and Sparks, T.C. (1995) Spinosyns: an overview of new natural insects management systems.Proc. 1995 Beltwide Cotton Production Conf. (Memphis, TN, USA), pp. 1039–1043.

  28. Vail, P.V, Tebbets, J.S., Curtis, C.E. and Jenner, K.E. (1993) Infestation rates and biological observations after harvest of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Torticidae) in stored in-shell walnuts.J. Econ. Entomol. 86: 1761–1765.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yee, W.L. and Toscano, N.C. (1998) Laboratory evaluations of synthetic and natural insecticides on beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) damage and survival on lettuce.J. Econ. Entomol. 91: 56–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yokoyama, VY. and Miller, G.T. (1999) Host status of fresh prunes by potential quarantine pests in laboratory tests, and evaluation of packinghouse culls.J. Econ. Entomol. 92: 485–489.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej A. Pszczolkowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pszczolkowski, M.A., Brown, J.J. Prospects of monosodium glutamate use for enhancement of spinosad toxicity against codling moth neonates. Phytoparasitica 30, 243–252 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03039993

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03039993

Key words

  • Codling moth
  • Cydia pomonella
  • codling moth feeding
  • monosodium glutamate
  • spinosad