Skip to main content
Log in

A study on kinetic frictional properties in Begg/KB orthodontic appliances at posterior sites

  • Original
  • Published:
Shigaku = Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Begg and KB techniques, the kinetic frictional force generated between their characteristic orthodontic appliances at posterior sites and the orthodontic wire affects the efficiency of tooth movement. We compared the kinetic frictional force between the recent orthodontic appliances for posterior sites: the by-pass loop-KB buccal tube system (loop-KB tube system) and the conventional by-pass clamp-round buccal tube system (clamp-round tube system), and elucidated the frictional properties of the loop-KB tube system. We used 016"/018" round wires (016/018 round) and 022" × 016" ribbon wire (022 ribbon) with anchorage bend/curve applied. The results obtained were as follows:

  1. 1)

    The kinetic frictional energy was significantly larger in the loop-KB tube system than in the clamp-round tube system for all the degrees of anchorage bend with 016/018 round, and not significant between in both systems with 022 ribbon.

  2. 2)

    With 016/018 round, the kinetic frictional energy became larger with the increase of the degree of anchorage bend in two systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Begg PR: Light arch wire technique, Am J Orthodontics,47: 30–48, 1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kameda A: An outline of the revised Begg technique & tip edge system (KB technique), Jpn J BEGG Orthod,11: 1–22, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Begg PR and Kesling PC: Begg orthodontic theory and technique, 3rd ed, Saunders WB Company, Philadelphia, 1977, 87–141, 222–282.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andreasen GF and Quevedo FR: Evaluation of friction forces in the 0.022×0.028 edgewise bracketin vitro, J Biomech,3: 151–160, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamiyama T and Sasaki T: Friction and width of brackets, J Jpn Orthod Soc,32: 286–289, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson L, Spencer R and Andreasen G: A comparison of friction resistance of nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets, Quintessence Int,13: 563–571, 1982.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker KL, Nieberg LG, Weimer AD and Hanna M: Frictional changes in force values caused by saliva substitution, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,91: 316–320, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pratten DH, Popli K, Germane N and Gunsolley JC: Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,98: 398–403, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prososki RR, Bagby MD and Erickson LC: Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickeltitanium arch wires, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,100: 341–348, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank CA and Nikolai RJ: A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire, Am J Orthod,78: 593–609, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garner LD, Allai WW and Moore BK: A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise arch wire, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,90: 199–203, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stannard JG, Gau JM and Hanna MA: Comparative friction of orthodontic wires under dry and wet conditions, Am J Orthod,89: 485–491, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tidy DC: Frictional forces in fixed appliances, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,96: 249–254, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drescher D, Bourauel C and Schumacher H: Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,96: 397–404, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kapila S, Angolkar PV, Duncanson Jr MG and Nanda RS: Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,98: 117–126, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Angolkar PV, Kapila S, Duncanson Jr MG and Nanda RS: Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,98: 499–506, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Endo T, Horii K, Yasuda K and Kameda A: A study on the frictional properties of low friction bracket, J Jpn Orthod Soc,53: 515–521, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vaughan JL, Duncanson Jr MG, Nanda RS and Currier GF: Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires, Am J Orthod Dentfac Orthop,107: 20–27, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oka K, Endo T, Wada H, Minegishi T, Akashiba T, et al.: A study on frictional characteristics of KB horizontal brackets — A comparative study of kinetic frictional forces to be caused between various kinds of brackets and wires—, Shigaku,77: 1458–1469, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oka K, Endo T, Akashiba T, Kawashima F and Kameda A: A study on kinetic frictional forces between various wires and by-pass clamp, by-pass loop, two buccal tubes used in the KB technique, Shigaku,80: 755–769, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Creekmore TH: The importance of interbracket width in orthodontic tooth movement, J Clin Orthod,10: 530–534, 1976.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Endo, T., Kosuge, N., Kuzuya, H. et al. A study on kinetic frictional properties in Begg/KB orthodontic appliances at posterior sites. Shigaku = Odontology 85, 379–384 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03039035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03039035

Key words

Navigation