Abstract
Background
The ability to eradicate localized prostate cancer is dependent upon the radiation dose which can be delivered to the prostate. This dose is often limited by the tolerance of normal organs (rectum, bladder). Conformal beam therapy takes advantage of the unique depth dose characteristics of heavy charged particles (the Bragg Peak) to escalate the radiation dose delivered to the prostate while minimizing treatment-related toxicity.
Method
643 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with protons alone or a combination of protons and photons. All treatment was planned on a 3-D planning system and all received doses between 74–75 CGE (Cobalt Gray Equivalent) at 1.8–2.0 CGE/day. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and response to treatment.
Results
Five-year actuarial clinical and biochemical disease-free survival rates for the entire group are 89 and 79% respectively. A statistically significant difference in biochemical disease-free survival was seen between patients in the “early” (T1b-2b, PSA<15) and “advanced” (T1b-2b, PSA>15 or T2c-T4, PSA<50) subgroups (89% vs. 68% at 4.5 years, p<0.001). A PSA nadir of less than 0.51 ng/ml predicted for the highest chance of freedom from biochemical recurrence. Minimal radiation proctitis was seen in 21% of patients; toxicity of greater serverity was seen in less than 1%.
Conclusion s
Conformal proton beamt therapy produced high rates of response and minimal toxicity. A phase III dose escalation trial is in progress to help define the optimum radiation dose for the treatment of early stage prostate cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hanks G, Martz K, Diamond J. The effect of dose on local control of prostate cancer. Int J radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988;15:1299–305.
Hanks G, Hanlon A, Schultheiss T, et al. Early prostate cancer: the national results of radiation treatment from the patterns of care and radiation therapy oncology group studies with prospects for improvement with conformal radiation and adjuvant androgen deprivation. J Urol 1994;152:1775–80.
Hanks G, Lee W, Schultheiss T. Clinical and biochemical evidence of control of prostate cancer at five years after external beam radiation. J Urol 1995;154:456–9.
Archambeau J, Bennett G, Levine G, et al. Proton radiation therapy. Radiology 1974;110:445–57.
Wilson R. Radiological use of fast protons. Radiology 1946;47:487–91.
Slater J, Archambeau J, Miller D, et al. The proton treatment center at Loma Linda University Medical Center: rationale for and description of its development. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;22:383–9.
Slater J, Yonemoto L, Rossi C, et al. Conformal proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42;2:299–304.
Partin A, Pound C, Clemens J, et al. Serum PSA after anatomic radical prostatectomy: The Jon Hopkins experience after ren years. Urol Clin N Am 1993;20:713–25.
Fukunaga-Johnson N, Sandler HM, McLaughlin PW, et al. Results of 3-D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;38:311–7.
Blasko JC, Wallner K, Grimm PD, et al. Prostate specific antigen based disease control following ultrasound guided iodine 125 implantation for stage T1/T2 prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 1995;54(3):1096–9.
Wallner K, Roy J, Harrison L. Tumor control and morbidity following transperineal iodine 125 implantation for stage T1/T2 prostatic carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1996;14(2):449–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rossi, C.J. Conformal proton beam therapy of prostate cancer — update on the loma linda university medical center experience. Strahlenther Onkol 175 (Suppl 2), 82–84 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03038897
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03038897