Skip to main content
Log in

Akuttoxizität der simultanen Radiochemotherapie des Rektumkarzinoms

Acute toxicity of chemoradiation for rectal cancer

  • Originalarbeit
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Retrospektive Untersuchung von Art und Ausprägung der therapieassoziierten Toxizität der simultanen Radiochemotherapie des Rektumkarzinoms zur Bestimmung wesentlicher Einflußfaktoren ihres Auftretens.

Patienten und Methode

Von 1987 bis 1995 wurde bei 120 Patienten mit Rektumkarzinom (73 Primärtumoren. 47 Rezidivtumoren) eine simultane Radiochemotherapie durchgeführt. 56 Patienten wurden präoperativ, 64 Patienten postoperativ behandelt. Die Bestrahlung erfolgte über eine Vier-Felder-Technik mit 6- bis 10-MV-Photonen. Die Einzeldosis betrug 1,8 Gy im Referenzpunkt (Isozentrum, ICRU 50), die Gesamtdosis lag bei 50,4 Gy (Range: 41,4 bis 56 Gy) ±5,4 Gy (Range: 3,6 bis 19,8 Gy) Boost. In der ersten und fünften Bestrahlungswoche erhielten die Patienten an fünf aufeinanderfolgenden Tagen eine Dosis von täglich 1000 mg/m2 5-Fluorouracil (Maximaldosis 1800 mg) als intravenöse Dauerinfusion über 120 Stunden. Die Toxizitätsanalyse erfolgte gemäß (modifizierter) WHO- Kriterien.

Ergebnisse

Grad-4-Akuttoxizität wurde bei nur drei Patienten beobachtet (Leukopenie, Sepsis, Herzrhythmusstörungen). Grad-3-Akuttoxizität trat insbesondere als Diarrhö (33%), perineale Epitheliolysen (37%) und Leukopenie (10%) auf. Bei zusätzlicher Bestrahlung des paraaortalen Lymphabflußgebietes (bis L3) zeigte sich ein signifikanter Anstieg an Grad-3-Diarrhö (68% vs. 25%, p=0,0003) und Grad-3-Leukopenie (18% vs. 8%, p=0,03). Nach abdominoperinealer Exstirpation litten signifikant weniger Patienten unter Grad-3-Diarrhö (8% vs. 47% nach kontinenzerhaltender Operation, p=0,0006), höhergradige Hauttoxizität war bei diesen Patienten dagegen signifikant häufiger (56% vs. 29%, p=0,02). Bei Frauen war im Vergleich zu Männern die Toxizität signifikant höher (Grad-3-Diarrhö: 39% vs. 16%, p=0,04; Grad-2/3-Übelkeit/Erbrechen: 21% vs. 8%, p=0,018; Grad-2/3-Leukopenie: 53% vs. 31%, p=0,02). Bei der präoperativen Radiochemotherapie war die Grad-3-Diarrhö (11% vs. 29%, p=0,03) und Grad-3-Hauttoxizität (16% vs. 41%, p=0,04) signifikant reduziert.

Schlußfolgerung

Wesentliche Einflußfaktoren der Akuttoxizität bei simultaner Radiochemotherapie des Rektumkarzinoms sind Bestrahlungsvolumen, Operationsart. Geschlecht und Therapiesequenz. Ein Monitoring der 5-FU-Clearance (bei Frauen geringer als bei Männern) und eine entsprechende individuelle Anpassung der 5-FU-Dosis könnten zu einer Optimierung der Therapie beitragen. Die Reduzierung der akuten Nebenwirkungen durch die präoperative Radiochemotherapie liefert ein gewichtiges Argument für die neoadjuvante Radiochemotherapie des Rektumkarzinoms.

Abstract

Aim

We retrospectively examined the acute toxicity of (neo-)adjuvant combined treatment for rectal cancer in an attempt to evaluate potential factors that influence the severity of toxic side effects.

Patients and Method

Between 1987 and 1995, 120 patients with rectal cancer (73 patients with primary tumor, 47 with recurrent disease) received chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Fifty-six patients received preoperative chemoradiation, 64 patients were treated postoperatively. Radiation was given by 4-field box technique with 6 to 10 MV-photons. Daily fraction size was 1.8 Gy, total dose 50.4 Gy (range: 41,4 to 56 Gy) ±5.4 Gy (range: 3,6 to 19,8 Gy) local boost in selected cases, specified to the ICRU reference point. During the first and fifth week of radiation 5-FU at a dose of 1000 m2/d for 120 hours was administered by continuous infusion. Toxicity was recorded following (modified) WHO-criteria.

Results

Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred mainly as diarrhea (33%), perineal skin reaction (37%), and leukopenia (10%). Extension of the treatment volume including paraaortic lymph nodes (L3) led to a significant increase of grade 3-diarrhea (68% vs. 25%, p=0.0003) and grade 3-leukopenia (18% vs. 8%, p=0.03). After abdominoperineal resection less patients suffered from grade 3-diarrhea (8% vs. 47% after sphincter preserving procedures, p=0.0006), whereas severe perineal erythema occurred more frequently (56% vs. 29%, p=0.02). Women had significantly more toxic side effects (grade 3-diarrhea: 39% vs. 16% in men, p=0,04; grade 2 to 3-nausea/emesis: 21% vs. 8% in men, p=0.018; grade 2 to 3-leukopenia 53% vs. 31% in men, p=0.02). After preoperative chemoradiation a significant reduction of grade 3-diarrhea (11% vs 29%, p=0.03) and grade 3-crythema (16% vs. 41%, p=0.04) was noted.

Conclusion

Treatment volume, type of surgery, sex and sequence of treatment modalities are the most important factors that influence the severity of toxic side effects. Individual adjustment of 5-FU dosage by monitoring its systemic clearance (which is lower in women) could help to avoid toxic side effects. The reduced acute toxicity of the preoperative approach provides a further argument in favor of the neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Etienne, M. C., J. L. Lagrange, O. Dassonville, R. Fleming, A. Thyss, N. Renée, M. Schneider, F. Demard, G. Milano: Population study of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in cancer patients. J. clin. Oncol. 12 (1994), 2248–2253.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallagher, M. J., H. D. Brereton, R. A. Rostock, J. M. Zero, D. A. Zekosky, L. F. Poyss, M. P. Richter, M. M. Kligerman: A prospective study of treatment techniques to minimize the volume of pelvic small bowel with reduction of acute and late effects associated with pelvic irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 12 (1986), 1565–1573.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group: Survival after postoperative combination treatments of cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 315 (1986), 1294–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heggie, G. D., J. P. Sommadossi, D. S. Cross, W. J. Huster, R. B. Diasio: Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile. Cancer Res. 47 (1987), 2203–2206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Herbert, S. H., W. J. Curran, L. J. Solin, P. M. Stafford, R. M. Lanciano, G. H. Hanks. Decreasing gastrointestinal morbidity with the use of small bowel contrast during treatment planning for pelvic radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 20 (1991), 835–842.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hombrink, J., A.-C. Voss, D. Fröhlich, M. Gletzel, A. Krau, F. H. Glaser: Therapieansätze zur Prophylaxe der strahleninduzierten Diarrhoc nach Becken- und Abdominalbestrahlung. Strahlenther. Onkol. 171 (1995), 49–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Krook, J. E., C. G. Moertel, L. L. Gunderson, H. S. Wieand, R. T. Collins, R. W. Beart, T. P. Kubista, M. A. Poon, W. C. Meyers, J. A. Mailliard, D. I. Twito, R. F. Morton, M. H. Veeder, T. E. Witzig, S. Cha, S. C. Vidyarth: Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. New Engl. J. Med. 324 (1991), 709–715.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Letschert, J. G. J., J. V. Lebesque, B. M. P. Aleman, J. F. Bosset, J. C. Horiot, H. Bertelink, L. Cionini, J. P. Hamers, J. W. H. Leer, M. Van Glabbeke: The volume effect in radiation-related small bowel complications: results of a clinical study of the EORTC Radiotherapy Cooperative Group in patients treated for rectal carcinoma. Radiother. Oncol. 32 (1994), 116–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Milano, G., M. C. Etiene, E. Cassuto-Viguier, A. Thyss, J. Santini, M. Frenay, N. Rence, M. Schneider, F. Demard: Influence of sex and age on fluorouracil clearance. J. clin. Oncol. 10 (1992), 1171–1175.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Minsky, B. D., A. M. Cohen, N. Kemeny, W. E. Enker, D. P. Kelsen, B. Reichmann, L. Saltz, E. R. Sigurdson, J. Frankel: Combined modality therapy of rectal cancer: decreased acute toxicity with the preoperative approach. J. clin. Oncol. 10 (1992), 1218–1224.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Minsky, B. D., J. A. Conti, Y. Huang, K. Knopf: Relationship of acute gastrointestinal toxicity and the volume of irradiated small bowel in patients receiving combined modality therapy for rectal cancer. J. clin. Oncol. 13 (1995), 1409–1416.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. NIH Consensus Conference: Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectal cancer. J. Amer. Med. Ass. 264 (1990), 1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Philips, T. L.: Tissue toxicity of radiation-drug interactions. In: Sokol, G. H., R. P. Maickel (eds.): Radiation-drug interactions in the treatment of cancer, Wiley, New York 1980, p. 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Port, R. E., B. Daniel, R. W. Ding, R. Hermann: Relative importance of dose, body surface, sex and age for 5-fluorouracil clearance. Oncology 48 (1991), 277–281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rudat, V., M. Flentje, R. Engenhart, M. Metzger, M. Wannenmacher: Lochbrettechnik zur Dünndarmschonung. Strahlenther. Onkol. 171 (1995), 437–443.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Russ, J., G. Smoron, J. Gagnon: Omental transposition flap in colorectal carcinoma: adjunctive use in prevention and treatment of radiation complications. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 10 (1984), 55–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Santini, J., G. Milano, A. Thyss, N. Renee, P. Viens, P. Ayela, M. Schneider, F. Demard: 5-FU therapeutic monitoring with dose adjustment leads to an improved therapeutic index in head and neck cancer. Brit. J. Cancer 59 (1989), 287–290.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott, H., I. Solin, J. Hoffmann, D. Schultz, W. Curran, R. Lanciano, N. Rosenblum, M. Hogan, B. Eisenberg, G. Hanks. Volumetric analysis of small bowel displacement for radiation portals with the use of pelvic tissue expander. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 25 (1993), 885–893.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stein, B. N., N. J. Petrelli, H. O. Douglass, D. L. Driscoll, G. Arcangeli, N. J. Meropol: Age and sex are independent predictors of 5-fluorouracil toxicity. Cancer 75 (1995), 11–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organisation: WHO Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Offset Publication No. 48. WHO. Genf 1979.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rödel, C., Fietkau, R., Keilholz, L. et al. Akuttoxizität der simultanen Radiochemotherapie des Rektumkarzinoms. Strahlenther. Onkol. 173, 415–421 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03038317

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03038317

Schlüsselwörter

Key words

Navigation