New Generation Computing

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 67–75 | Cite as

The influence of investor's behavioral biases on the usefulness of the Dual Moving Average Crossovers

Special Feature

Abstract

The so called Dual Moving Average Crossovers are said to be useful signals for forecasting trends of stock prices, as one of the technical analysis methods. First, we examined the usefulness of these crossovers by using historical daily closing price data and tick by tick price data of Japanese stocks. The results revealed that these crossovers were useful as confirmatory signals for forecasting market trends. Second, we tried to identify the underlying reasons for the usefulness of the crossovers. A model, which followed the Efficient Market Hypothesis, was found to fail to generate the price fluctuation where the crossovers were useful. We then developed a model that incorporated investor's suspicion about current price validity and two famous behavioral biases: conservativeness and representativeness. We identified the mechanism that those crossovers were closely related to investor's suspicion and the behavioral biases.

Keywords

Technical Analysis Dual Moving Average Crossovers Efficient Market Hypothesis Representativeness Conservativeness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    Andrei, S., “A Model of Investor Sentiment,”Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 112–153, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    Balsara, N., Carlson, K. and Rao, N. V., “Unsystematic Futures Profits with Technical Trading Rules: A Case for Flexibility,”Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 9, 1996, Prentice Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1960.Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    Barberis, N., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., “A Model of Investor Sentiment,”Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    Black, F. and Scholes, M., “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,”Journal of Political Economy, 81, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    Brock, W., Lakonishok, J. and Lebaron, B., “Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns,”Journal of Finance, 47, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    Edwards, W., “Conservatism in Human Information Processing,”Formal Representation of Human Judgment (Kleinmuntz, B., Ed.), Wiley, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    Fama, E. F., “Efficient Capital Markets: A review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence,”Journal of Finance, 25, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. 8).
    Fama, E. F., “Efficient Capital Markets II,”Journal of Finance, 46, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. 9).
    Granville, J.,Strategy of Daily Stock Market Timing, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. 10).
    Kahneman, D. and Riepe, M., “Aspects of investor psychology,”Journal of Portfolio Management, 24, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    Lo, A. W. and MacKinlay, A. C., “Stock Market Prices do not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test,”Review of Financial Studies 1, pp. 41–66, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12).
    Lo, A. W. and MacKinlay, A. C.,A Non-Random Walk down Wall Street, Princeton University Press, NJ, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13).
    Neftci, S., “Naive Trading Rules in Financial Markets and Wiener-Kolmogorov Prediction Theory: A Study of Technical analysis,”Journal of Business, 64, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    Taylor, S. J., “Profitable Currency Futures Trading: a Comparison of Technical and Time-series Trading Rules,”The Currency Hedging Debate (Lee R. Thomas III, Ed.), IFR Publishing, London, 1990.Google Scholar
  15. 15).
    Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., “Judgment Under Uncertainly: Heuristic and Biases,”Science, 22, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ohmsha, Ltd. and Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systems ScienceUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations