Advertisement

Asia Pacific Education Review

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 108–119 | Cite as

Aggressor/victim subtypes and teacher factors in first grade as risk factors for later mental health symptoms and school functioning

  • Jong -Hyo ParkEmail author
Article and Report

Abstract

In a sample of 244 first graders, we identified four subtypes of children based on multi-informant measures of victimization by peers and aggression toward peers: aggressive victims (AV), non-victimized aggressors, non-aggressive victims, and non-aggressive, non-victimized (i.e., normative) children. We examined the differences between the aggressor/victim groups concurrently and two years later in third grade in terms of both mental health symptoms (severity and directionality) and school functioning (academic competence and school engagement). AV showed the worst results for mental health, academic competence, and school engagement concurrently and two years later. The role of first-grade teacher experience and education in predicting third-grade outcomes was also the subject of examination. Significant interactional effects were found between both AV and teacher experience and education. Most notably, the education level of first-grade teachers interacted with AV status to predict school engagement, such that the least engaged students at third grade were AV whose first-grade teachers had no schooling beyond a bachelor’s degree.

Key Words

Aggressive Victims Teacher Experience Teacher Education Mental Health Symptoms School Adjustment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber, J. L., Brown, J. L., & Jones, S. M. (2003). Developmental trajectories toward violence in middle childhood: course, demographic differences, and response to school-based intervention.Developmental Psychology, 39, 324–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ablow, J. C., Measelle, J. R, Kraemer, H. C., Harrington, R., Luby, J., Smider, N. A., Dierker, L., Clark, V., Dubika, B., Heffelfinger, A., Essex, M. J., & Kupfer, D. J. (1999). The MacArthur Three-City Outcome Study: evaluating multi-informant measures of young children’s symptomatology.Journal of the Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 1580–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, J. B. (1999).Exploring high and improving reading achievement in Connecticut. Washington, DC: National Educational Goals Panel.Google Scholar
  4. Boyle, M. H., Offord, D. R., Racine, Y., Szatmari, P., & Sanford, M. (1993). Evaluation of the revised Ontario Health Study Scales.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 34, 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buhs, E.S., & Ladd, G.W. (2001). Peer rejection as an antecedent of young children’s school adjustment: an examination of mediating processes.Developmental Psychology, 37, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burchinal, M. R., Peisner-Feinberg, E., Pianta, R., & Howes, C. (2002). Development of academic skills from preschool through second grade: family and classroom predictors of developmental trajectories.Journal of School Psychology, 40, 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Catalano, R. F., Mazza, J. J., Harachi, T. W., Abbott, R. D., Haggerty, K. P., & Fleming, C. B. (2003). Raising healthy children through enhancing social development in elementary school: results after 1.5 years.Journal of School Psychology, 41, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, L. (2003). Variable effects of children’s aggression, social withdrawal, and prosocial leadership as functions of teacher beliefs and behaviors.Child Development, 74, 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966).Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms on reactive and proactive aggression.Child Development, 67, 993–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000, January). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence.Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8 [On-line serial]. Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.Google Scholar
  13. Deater-Deckard, K. (2001). Annotation: recent research examining the role of peer relationships in the development of psychopathology.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42, 565–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., Harnish, J. D., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1997). Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impaired chronically assaultive youth.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elmore, R., & Burney, D. (1997).Investing in teacher learning: staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.Google Scholar
  17. Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1989). Early schooling as a “critical period” phenomenon. In K. Namboodiri & R. G. Corwin (Eds.),Research in the sociology of education and socialization, volume 8: selected methodological issues (pp. 27–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  18. Essex, M. J., Klein, M. H., Cho, E., & Kalin, N. H. (2002). Maternal stress beginning in infancy may sensitize children to later stress exposure: effects on cortisol and behavior.Biological Psychiatry, 52, 776–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Essex, M. J., Boyce, W. T., Goldstein, L. H., Armstrong, J. M., Kraemer, H. C., Kupfer, D. J., et al. (2002). The confluence of mental, physical, social and academic difficulties in middle childhood II: Developing the MacArthur Health and Behavior Questionnaire.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 588–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farmer, A. D., Bierman, K. L., & The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2002). Predictors and consequences of aggressive-withdrawn problem profiles in early grade school.Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 299–311.Google Scholar
  21. Frome, P.M., & Eccles, J.S. (1998). Parents’ influence on children’s achievement-related perceptions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement.Review of Educational Research, 66, 361–396.Google Scholar
  23. Hardy, M. A. (1993).Regression with dummy variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2004). Aggressive victims, passive victims, and bullies: Developmental continuity or developmental change?Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haselager, G. T., Cillessen, A. H. N., Van Lieshout, C. F. M., Riksen-Walraven, J. M. A., & Hartup, W. W. (2002). Heterogeneity among peer-rejected across middle childhood: Developmental pathways of social behavior.Developmental Psychology, 38, 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A. D., Saylor, K., Yu, K., & Simons-Morton, B. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: distinct groups of at-risk youth.Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henry, D. B. (2000). Peer groups, families, and school failure among urban children: elements of risk and successful interventions.Preventing School Failure, 44, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hess, L. E., & Atkins, M. C. (1998). Victims and aggressors at school: teacher, self, and peer perceptions of psychosocial functioning.Applied Developmental Science, 2, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ialongo, N. S., Werthamer, L., Kellam, S. G., Brown, C. H., Songbai, W., & Lin, Y. (1999). Proximal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on the early risk behaviors for later substance abuse, depression, and antisocial behavior.American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 599–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2000). Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence.Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kellam, S. G., Ling, X., Merisca, R., Brown, C. H., & Ialongo, N. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school.Development and Psychopathology, 10, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2003). Identification of aggressive and asocial victims and the stability of their peer victimization.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 401–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Wardrop, J. L. (2001). Chronicity and instability of children’s peer victimization experiences as predictors of loneliness and social satisfaction trajectories.Child Development, 72, 134–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kochenderfer, B.J., & Ladd, G.W. (1996). Peer victimization: manifestations and relations to school adjustment in kindergarten.Journal of School Psychology, 34, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kraemer, H. C. & Blasey, C. M. (2004). Centering in regression analysis: A strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference.International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kraemer, H. C., Measelle, J. R., Ablow, J. C., Essex, M. J., Boyce, W. T., & Kupfer, D. J. (2003). A new approach to multiple informants: Mixing and matching contexts and perspectives.American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1566–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kumpulainen, K., Rassanen, E., Henttonen, I., Almqvist, F., Kresanov, K., Linna, S. L., et al. (1998). Bullying and psychiatric symptoms among elementary school-age children.Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 705–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kupersmidt, J. B., Burchinal, M., & Patterson, C. (1995). Developmental patterns of childhood peer relations as predictors of externalizing behavior problems.Development and Psychopathology, 7, 825–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ladd, G. W., & Burgess, K. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment?Child Development, 72, 1579–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ladd. G. W. (1999). Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle childhood.Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 333–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Little, T. D., Brauner, J., Jones, S. M., Nock, M. K., & Hawley, P. H. (2003). Rethinking aggression: A typological examination of the functions of aggression.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 343–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olweus, D. (1978).Aggression in the schools: bullies and their whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  43. Park, J. Essex, M., & Klein, M. (2003). Aggressive victims as a distinct subgroup of school bullying: Early child and family factors.Presented at the Biannual Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL. Google Scholar
  44. Perry, D. G., Perry, L. C., & Kennedy, E. (1992). Conflict and the development of antisocial behavior. In Shantz, C. U., & Hartup, W. W. (Eds.),Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 301–329). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Pierce, K. M., Hamm, J. V., & Vandell, D. L. (1999). Experiences in after-school programs and children’s adjustment in first-grade classrooms.Child Development, 70, 756–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reid, J. B., Eddy, J. M., Fetrow, R. A., & Stoolmiller, M. (1999). Description and immediate impacts of a preventive intervention for conduct problems.American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 483–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rudolph, K. D., & Asher, S. R. (2000). Adaptation and maladaptation in the peer system: developmental processes and outcomes. In A. J. Sameroff, M. Lewis, & S. M. Miller (Eds.),Handbook of Developmental Psychopathology (pp. 157–175). New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Rutter, M., & Maughan, B. (2002). School effectiveness findings: 1979–2002.Journal of School Psychology, 40, 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children’s peer groups.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwartz, D., Proctor, L. J., & Chien, D. H. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.),Peer harassment in school: the plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147–174). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  51. Snyder, J. (1999).New Haven Unified School District: a teaching quality system for excellence and equity. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, Teacher’s College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  52. Stormshak, E. A., Bierman, K. L., Bruschi, C., Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts.Child Development, 70, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Toblin, R. L., Schwartz, D., Corman, A. H., & Abou-ezzeddine, T. (2005). Social-cognitive and behavioral attributes of aggressive victims of bullying.Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence.Child Development, 73, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wentzel, K. R. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school.Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Woodward, L. & Fergusson, D. M. (2000). Childhood peer relationship problems and later risks of educational under-achievement and unemployment.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van den Oord, E. J. C. G., & Van Rossem, R. (2002). Differences in first graders’ school adjustment: The role of classroom characteristics and social structure of the group.Journal of School Psychology, 40, 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korean Educational Development InstituteSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations