Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contesting community

The limits of democratic development

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Friedman, S. 1993.The Elusive ‘Community’: The Dynamics of Negotiated Urban Development. Johannesburg: Centre for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1978. Alienation and Social Classes. In Tucker, R. (ed.),The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa (RSA). 1995. Urban Development Strategy of the Government of National Unity.Government Gazette No. 16679, 3 Nov.

  • SANCO. 1994.Making People-Driven Development Work. Report of the Commission on Development Finance. Johannesburg: SANCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttner, R. and Cronin, J. 1986.30 Years of the Freedom Charter. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swilling, M. 1992. Quixote at the Windmills: Another Conspiracy Thesis by Steven Friedman.Theoria 79, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, R. (comp.). 1994.Urban Development Planning: Lessons for the Economic Reconstruction of South Africa's Cities. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Ivor Chipkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chipkin, I. Contesting community. Urban Forum 7, 217–231 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036763

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036763

Keywords

Search

Navigation