Skip to main content
Log in

Oilspots, oases, voices and scorpions whither development struggles?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Obviously the terms that have been used are not precise concepts, but rather pictures that can be used for seeing development processes as they unfold. We need these pictures at the moment because the power and sheer magnitude of a technicist developmental ideology is permeating the entire structure and systems of the RDP. Hopefully as more people try to really unpack the meaning of developmental concepts, more and more space will be created for critical reflection and review. There is a very serious danger that populist developmentalism — supported by a technocratic disempowering discourse — could spill over into a new authoritarianism — ‘if you don't support our line, you must be against the people and the President’. The alternative must be to struggle for a more democratic developmentalism that is rooted in accountable organisational structures across all sectors. This can only happen, however, if we retain our past traditions of critical review and reassessment of our assumptions and strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swilling, M. Oilspots, oases, voices and scorpions whither development struggles?. Urban Forum 6, 157–161 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036698

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036698

Keywords

Navigation