Standardizing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: past, present, and future

Rating Scales

Abstract

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) has become the most widely used depression severity rating scale in the world. It was originally published by Max Hamilton in 1960 to measure severity of depression in previously diagnosed depressed inpatients. Since that time, multiple versions of the scale have been created, although authors are rarely clear about which version they used. In addition, structured interview guides, self-report forms, and computerized versions have been developed in an effort to standardize administration of the scale and improve the psychometric characteristics of the individual items. The history of the development of these features is discussed, and the various versions of the scale are summarized in tables. This article is a fitting tribute to Per Bech, who has contributed so much to the assessment of depression severity.

Key words

Depression severity Hamilton Depression Scale depression interview 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bech P (1981) Rating scales for affective disorders: their validity and consistency. Acta Psychiatr Scand 64 (suppl 295): 1–101Google Scholar
  2. Bech P (1990) Psychometric developments of the Hamilton Scales: the spectrum of depression, dysthymia, and anxiety. In: Bech P, Coppen A (eds) The Hamilton Scales. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bech P, Allerup P (1981) The Hamilton Depression Scale: evaluation of objectivity using logistic models. Acta Psychiatr Scand 63: 290–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bech P, Allerup P, Reisby N, Gram LF (1984) Assessment of symptom change from improvement curves on the Hamilton depression scale in trials with antidepressants. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 84: 276–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bech P, Coppen A (1990) The Hamilton Scales. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bech P, Gram LF, Dein E, Jacobsen O, Vitger J, Bolwig TG (1975) Quantitative rating of depression states: correlation between clinical assessment, Beck’s self-rating scale and Hamilton’s objective rating scale. Acta Psychiat Scand 51:161–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bech P, Kastrup M, Rafaelsen OJ (1986) Mini-compendium of rating scales for anxiety, depression, mania, schizophrenia with corresponding DSM-III syndromes. Acta Psychiatr Scand (suppl) 326: 1–37Google Scholar
  8. Bech P, Rafaelsen OJ (1980) The use of rating scales exemplified by a comparison of the Hamilton and the Bech Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 62 (suppl 185): 128–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr AC, Anceill RJ, Ghosh A, Margo A (1981) Direct assessment of depression by microcomputer: a feasibility study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 64:415–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll BJ, Fielding JM, Blashki TG (1973) Depression rating scales. A critical review. Arch Gen Psychiatry 28:361–6Google Scholar
  11. Carroll BJ, Feinberg M, Smouse PE, Rawson SG, Greden JF (1981) The Carroll Rating Scale for Depression. I. Development, reliability and validation. Br J Psychiatry 138:194–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Endicott J, Cohen J, Nee J, Fleiss J, Sarantakos S (1981) Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: extracted from regular and change versions of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38: 98–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Faries D, Herrera J, Rayamajhi J, DeBrota D, Demitrack M, Potter WZ (2000) The responsiveness of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. J of Psychiatric Research 34: 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gelenberg AJ, Wojcik JD, Falk WE, Baldessarini RJ, Zeisel SH, Schoenfeld D, Mok GS (1990) Tyrosine for depression: a double-blind trial. JAffDis 19:125–132Google Scholar
  15. Gibbons RD, Clark DC, Kupfer DJ (1993) Exactly what does the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measure? J Psychiat Res 27: 259–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guy W (1976) Assessment manual for psychopharmacology. (Department of Health and Human Services Publication No. 76-338). Washington, DC: US Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23: 56–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton M (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 6: 278–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hedlund JL, Vieweg BW (1979) The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: a comprehensive review. J Oper Psychiatry 2:149–164Google Scholar
  20. Klein DF (1974) Endogenomorphic depression — a conceptual and terminological revision. Arch Gen Psychiat 31:447–454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Klerman GL, Weissman MM, Rounsaville BJ, Chevron ES (1984) Interview format for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. In: Klerman GL, Weissman MM, Rounsaville BJ, Chevron ES (eds) Interpersonal Psychotherapy of Depression. Basic Books, Appendix, pp 223–233Google Scholar
  22. Kobak KA, Reynolds WR, Rosenfeld R, Greist JH (1990) Development and validation of a computer administered Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Psychological Assessment 2: 56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kobak KA, Mundt JC, Greist JH, Katzelnick DJ, Jefferson, JW (2000) Computer assessment of depression: automating the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Drug Information Journal 34:145–156Google Scholar
  24. Kovacs M, Rush AJ, Beck AT, Hollon SD (1981) Depressed outpatients treated with cognitive therapy or pharmacotherapy. A one-year follow-up. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38:33–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Maier W, Philipp M (1985) Improving the assessment of severity of depressive states: a reduction of the Hamilton Depression Scale. Pharmacopsychiat 18:114–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller IW, Bishop S, Norman WH, Maddever H (1985) The modified Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: reliability and validity. J Psychiat Res 14:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moberg PJ, Lazarus LW, Mesholam RI, Bilker W, Chuy IL, Neyman I, Markvart V (2001) Comparison of the standard and structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in depressed geriatric inpatients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 9(1): 35–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Paykel ES (1985) The Clinical Interview for Depression: development, reliability and validity. J Affect Disord 9: 85–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Potts MK, Daniels M, Burnam MA, Wells KB (1990) A structured interview version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: evidence of reliability and versatility of administration. J Psychiat Res 24: 335–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rapp SR, Smith SS, Britt M (1990) Identifying comorbid depression in elderly medical patients: use of the Extracted Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Psych Assess 2:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rehm LP, O’Hara MW (1985) Item characteristics of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. J Psychiatr Res 19: 31–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds WM, Kobak KA (1995) Development and validation of the Hamilton Depression Inventory: a self-report version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Psychological Assessment 7:472–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Riskind JH, Beck AT, Brown G, Steer RA (1987) Taking the measure of anxiety and depression: validity of the reconstructed Hamilton scales. J Nerv Ment Dis 175:474–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roberts JN, Lei HH, Krishen A, Donahue RMJ, Jamerson BD, Bolden-Watson C, Houser TL (2001) Identifying sub-scales of the 31-item Hamilton Depression Scale. Poster presented at New Clinical Drug Evaluation Unit (NCDEU) meeting, May 28–31, 2001, Phoenix, AZGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenthal SH, Klerman GL (1966) Endogenous features of depression in women. Can Psychiatr Assoc J11: 11–16Google Scholar
  36. Terman M (1988) On the question of mechanism in phototherapy for seasonal affective disorder: considerations of clinical efficacy and epidemiology. Journal of Biological Rhythms 3:155–172 [First published ref to SIGH-SAD]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Terman M, Williams JBW, Terman JS (1991) Light therapy for winter depression: a clinician’s guide. In: Keller PA (ed) Innovations in Clinical Practice: A Source Book. vol. 10, Professional Resource Exchange, Sarasota, FL, pp 179–221Google Scholar
  38. Thase ME (1984) A Hamilton subscale for endogenomorphic depression. Hillside J Clin Psychiatry 6: 57–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Thase ME, Frank E, Mallinger AG, Hamer T, Kupfer DJ (1992) Treatment of imipramine-resistant recurrent depression, III: Efficacy of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. J Clin Psychiatry 53: 5–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Thase ME, Hersen M, Bellack AS, Himmelhoch JM, Kupfer DJ (1983) Validation of a Hamilton subscale for endogenomorphic depression. J Affect Disord 5: 267–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whisman MA, Strosahl K, Fruzzetti AE, Schmaling KB, Jacobson NS, Miller DM (1989) A structured interview version of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Psych Assess 1:238–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams JBW (1988) A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45: 742–747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams JBW, Link M, Rosenthal NE, Amira L, Terman M (2000) Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale — Seasonal Affective Disorder Version (SIGH-SAD). New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  44. Zitman FG, Mennen MFG, Griez E, Hooijer C (1990) The different versions of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. In: Bech P, Coppen A (eds) The Hamilton Scales (Psychopharmacology Series 9), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 28–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit 60New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations