This paper examines the impact of husbands’ migration on the lives of women left behind. Using data from the India Human Development Survey 2005, we focus on two dimensions of women’s lives: women’s autonomy and control over their lives; and women’s labour force participation. Results suggest that household structure forms the key mediating factor through which husbands’ absence affects women. Women not residing in extended families are faced with both higher levels of responsibilities and greater autonomy, while women who live in extended households do not experience these demands or benefits.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adams, A. and S. Castle. 1994. Gender relations and household dynamics. Pp. 161–173 in G. Sen, A. Germain and L.C. Chen (eds),Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights. Boston: Harvard University.
Anker, R. 1998.Gender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
Arya, S. and A. Roy 2006.Poverty, Gender and Migration. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Bilsborrow, R.E. 1992. Preliminary report of the United Nations Expert Group Meeting on the feminization of internal migration.International Migration Review 26(1): 138–161.
Bloom, S.S., D. Wypij and M. das Gupta. 2001. Dimensions of women’s autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a North Indian city.Demography, 38(1): 67–78.
Brown, B.B. 1983. The impact of male labour migration on women in Botswana.African Affairs 82(328): 367–388.
Buvinic, M., M.A. Lycette and W.P. McGreevey. 1993.Women and Poverty in the Third World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Chen, M.A. 2000.Perpetual Mourning: Widowhood in Rural India. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chin, C.B.N. 1997. Walls of silence and late twentieth century representations of the foreign female domestic worker: the case of Filipina and Indonesian female servants in Malaysia.International Migration Review 31(2): 353–385.
Constable, N. 1999. At home but not at home: Filipina narratives of ambivalent returns.Cultural Anthropology 14(2): 203–228.
Curran, S.R. and E. Rivero-Fuentes. 2003. Engendering migrant networks: the case of Mexican migration.Demography 40(2): 289–307.
de Haan, A. 2006. Migration, gender, poverty: family as the missing link. Pp. 107–128 in S. Arya and A. Roy (eds),Poverty, Gender and Migration. New Delhi: Sage.
De Jong, G.F. 2000. Expectations, gender, and norms in migration decision-making.Population Studies 54(3): 307–319.
Desai, S. 1994.Gender Inequalities and Demographic behavior in India. New York: Population Council.
Desai, S., A. Dubey, B.L. Joshi, M. Sen, A. Shariff and R. Vanneman. Forthcoming.Human Development in India: Challenges for a Society in Transition.
Donato, K.M. 1993. Current trends and patterns of female migration: evidence from Mexico.International Migration Review 27(4): 748–771.
Folbre, N. 1994.Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structure of Constraint. New York: Routledge.
Goldscheider, C. 1987. Migration and social structure: analytic issues and comparative perspectives in developing nations.Sociological Forum 2(4): 674–696.
Gulati, L. 1993.In the Absence of Their Men: The Impact of Male Migration on Women. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Gupta, A. and J. Ferguson. 1992. Beyond culture: space, identity, and the politics of difference.Cultural Anthropology 7(1): 6–23.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 1992. Overcoming patriarchal constraints: the reconstruction of gender relations among Mexican immigrant women and men.Gender and Society 6(3): 393–415.
Hoodfar, H. 1996. Egyptian male migration and urban families left behind: feminization of Egyptian family or a reaffirmation of traditional gender roles? Pp. 51–79 in D. Singerman and H. Hoodfar (eds),Development, Change, and Gender in Cairo: A View from the Household. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hugo, G. 2000. Migration and women’s empowerment. Pp. 287–317. in H. Presser and G. Sen (eds).Women’s Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving beyond Cairo. New York: Oxford University Press.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. 2007.National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) 2005–2006, India. Volume 1. Mumbai.
Jejeebhoy, J.S. and A.Z. Sathar. 2001. Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: the influence of religion and region.Population and Development Review 27(4): 687.
Jetley, S. 1987. Impact of male migration on rural females.Economic and Political Weekly 22(44): WS47-WS53.
Kabeer, N. 1999. The conditions and consequences of choice: reflections on measurement of women’s empowerment.UNRISD Discussion Paper. No. 108. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Kanaiaupuni, S.M. 2000. Reframing the migration question: an analysis of men, women, and gender in Mexico.Social Forces 78(4): 1311–1347.
Laczko, F. 2002. New directions for migration policy in Europe.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 357(1420): 599–608.
Lan, P.-C. 2003. Maid or madam? Filipina migrant workers and the continuity of domestic labor.Gender and Society 17(2): 187–208.
Lloyd, C. 1991. The contribution of the World Fertility Surveys to an understanding of the relationship between women’s work and fertility.Studies in Family Planning 22(3): 144–161.
Lucas, R.E.B. 1997. Internal migration in developing countries. Pp. 721–798 in M.R. Rosenzweig and O. Stark (eds),Handbook of Population and Family Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lutz, H. 2002. At your service madam! The globalization of domestic service.Feminist Review 70: 89–104.
Mascarenhas-Keyes, S. 1990. Migration, progressive motherhood’ and female autonomy: Catholic women in Goa. Pp. 119–143. in L. Dube and R. Palriwala (eds),Structures and Strategies: Women, Work and Family. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Mason, K.O. and H.L. Smith 2000. Husbands’ versus wives’ fertility goals and use of contraception: the influence of gender context in five Asian countries.Demography 37: 299–311.
Massey, D., R. Alarcon, J. Durand and H. Gonzalez. 1990.Return to Azatlan: The Social Process of International Migration from Western Mexico. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Massey, D., J. Arango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino and J.E. Taylor. 1998.Worlds in Motion: International Migration at the End of the Millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morokvasic, M. 2004. Settled in mobility: engendering post-wall migration in Europe.Feminist Review 77: 7–25.
National Sample Survey Organisation. 2001.Migration in India, 1999–2000. New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
Paris, T., A. Singh, J. Luis and M. Hossain. 2005. Labour outmigration, livelihood of rice farming households and women left behind: a case study in Eastern Uttar Pradesh.Economic and Political Weckly 40(25): 2522–2529.
Presser, H. 1998. Decaptitating the U.S. Census Bureau’s head of household: feminist mobilization in the 1970s.Feminist Economics 4(3): 145–158.
Roberts, K. 2002. Female labor migrants to Shanghai: temporary ‘floaters’ or potential settlers?International Migration Review 36(2): 492–519.
Sen, M., S. Rastogi and R. Vanneman. 2006. Disempowered by whom? Gender vs. generation in family decision making. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, March.
Shah, N.M. 2004. Gender and labour migration to the Gulf countries.Feminist Review (77): 183–185.
Thomas, D. 1994. Like father, like son; like mother, like daughter: parental resources and child height.Journal of Human Resources 29(4): 950–988.
Whiteford, M.B., 1978. Women, migration and social change: a Colombian case study.International Migration Review 12(2): 236–247.
Yeoh, B.S.A., S. Huang and J. Gonzalez. 1999. Migrant female domestic workers: debating the economic, social and political impacts in Singapore.International Migration Review 33(1): 114–136.
Zlotnik, H. 1995. The South-to-North migration of women.International Migration Review 29(1): 229–254.
About this article
Cite this article
Desai, S., Banerji, M. Negotiated identities: Male migration and left-behind wives in India. Journal of Population Research 25, 337–355 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033894
- family structure
- internal migration
- consequences of migration
- womens labour force participation
- womens autonomy
- womens mobility
- intra-household decisions