Skip to main content
Log in

Diversity and change in Cambodian households, 1998–2006

  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extant ethnographic studies suggest that the nuclear family has been the predominant living arrangement in Cambodia, and the country’s rapid socioeconomic transformation since the early 1990s may have accentuated that dominance. To examine these claims, we analyse here household structure in Cambodia between 1998 and 2006, based on data from the 1998 Census, two nationally-representative surveys (2000 and 2005), and a continuing demographic surveillance system (from 2000 on). Our analysis confirms the large prevalence of nuclear families, but not an unequivocal trend toward their increasing prevalence. First, nuclear families are less prevalent in urban than in rural areas, and nationwide, they appear to have receded slightly between 2000 and 2005. We find that increases in the prevalence of extended households correspond to periods of faster economic growth, and interpret these contrasted trends as signs of tensions during this transitional period in Cambodia. While the nuclear family may still be the cultural norm, a high degree of pragmatism is also evident in the acceptance of other living arrangements, albeit temporary, as required by economic opportunities and housing shortage in urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antoine, P., P. Bocquier, A.S. Fall, Y.M. Guisse and J. Nanitelamio. 1995.Les familles Dakaroises face à la crise. Paris: ORSTOM, IFAN and CEPED (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J. 2001. Household size and composition in the developing world in the 1990s.Population Studies 55(3): 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, T.K. 1967. The size and structure of families: a comparative analysis of census data.American Sociological Review 32(3): 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, T.K. 1993. Theories of household formation: progress and challenges.Discussion Paper No. 93-6, University of Western Ontario, Population Studies Center, London, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta, M. 1998. Lifeboat versus corporate ethic: social and demographic implications of stem and joint families. Pp. 444–466 in A. Fauve-Chamoux and E. Ochiai (eds),House and the Stem Family in Eur Asian Perspective. 12th International Economic History Congress. Kyoto: International Research Centre for Japanese Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derosas, R. and M. Oris (eds). 2002.When Dad Died: Individuals and Families Coping with Distress in Past Societies. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebihara, M.M. 1968. Svay, a Khmer village in Cambodia. Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D. and L.H. Pritchett. 2001. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data or tears: an application to educational enrollment in states of India.Demography 38(1): 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. and J. Harris. 1991. The extended African-American family.Urban League Review 14: 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. 1963.World Revolution and Family Patterns. London: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. 1971.Technology, Tradition and the State in Africa. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. 1995.The Expansive Moment: The Rise of Social Anthropology in Britain and Africa, 1918–1970. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammel, E.A. and P. Laslett. 1974. Comparing household structure over time and between cultures.Comparative Studies in Society and History 16: 73–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuveline, P. 1998. Between one and three million: towards the demographic reconstruction of a decade of Cambodian history (1970–79).Population Studies 52(1): 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuveline, P. and B. Poch. 2006. Do marriages forget their past? Marital stability in post-Khmer Rouge Cambodia.Demography 43(1): 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuveline, P. and B. Poch. 2007. The phoenix population: demographic crisis and rebound in Cambodia.Demography 44(2): 405–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuveline, P., J.M. Timberlake and F.F. Furstenberg Jr. 2003. Shifting child rearing to single mothers: results from 17 Western nations.Population and Development Review 29(1): 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, C. 1996. Family and household structure in Vietnam: some glimpses from a recent survey.Pacific Affairs 69(2): 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, C. and J. Edwards. 2007. Social change in Southeast Asia. Pp. 4374–4380 in G. Ritzer (ed.),The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Vol. 9. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huguet, J. 1992. The demographic situation in Cambodia.Asia-Pacific Population Journal 6(4): 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, B. 1996.The Pol Pot Regime, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., S.K. Kim, Z. Zimmer and S. Puch. 2005. Older persons in Cambodia: a profile from the 2004 Survey of Elderly.Population Studies Center Research Report No. 05-576. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P. 1988. Family, kinship and collectivity as systems of support in pre-industrial Europe: a consideration of the nuclear-hardship’ hypothesis.Continuity and Change 3(2): 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgerwood, J.L. 1995. Khmer kinship: the matriliny/matriarchy myth.Journal of Anthropological Research 51(3): 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G.R. 1999. Comparative perspectives. Pp. 93–110 in M.B. Sussman, S.K. Steinmetz and G.W. Peterson (eds),Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Second edition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingat, R. 1952.Les régimes matrimoniaux du sud-est de l Asie: essai de droit compare indochinois. Tome premier: les régimes traditionnels. Paris: Editions de Bocard and Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martel, G. 1975.Lovea, village des environs d Angkor: Aspects démographiques, économiques, et sociologiques du monde rural cambodgien dans la province de Siem-Réap. Paris: Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K.O. 1992. Family change and support of the elderly in Asia: what do we know?Asia-Pacific Population Journal 7(3): 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. 1992. Convergence or compromise in historical change? Pp. 15–30 in E. Berquó and P. Xenos (eds),Family System and Cultural Change. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migozzi, J. 1973.Cambodge: faits et problèmes de population. Paris: CNRS (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naron, H.C. 2006.Cambodias Macroeconomic Developments in 2006. Phnom Penh: Secretary General Ministry of Economy and Finance, Supreme National Economic Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Health (NIH). 2001.Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey, 2000. Phnom Penh and Calverton MD: National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health [Cambodia] and ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Health (NIH). 2006.Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey, 2005. Phnom Penh and Calverton MD: National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health [Cambodia] and ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Statistics (NIS). 1999a.General Census of Cambodia 1998: Analysis of Census Results, Report 1, Fertility and Mortality. Phnom Penh.

  • National Institute of Statistics (NIS). 1999b.General Population Census of Cambodia 1998. Phnom Penh.

  • National Institute of Statistics (NIS). 2004.Cambodia Inter-Censal Population Survey, Report 2, Phnom Penh Municipality. Phnom Penh.

  • Népote, J. 1992.Parenté et organisation sociale dans le Cambodge moderne et contemporain. Geneva: Olizane SA (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovesen, J., I.-B. Trankell and J. Ojendal. 1996.When Every Household Is an Island: Social Organization and Power Structures in Rural Cambodia. Uppsala Research Reports in Cultural Anthropology Vol. 15. Uppsala: Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson J.L., A.G. Hunter, M.E. Ensminger and S.G. Kellam. 1990. Black grandmothers in multigenerational households: diversity in family structure and parenting involvement in the Woodlawn community.Child Development 61: 434–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilon, M. 2004. Démographie des ménages et de la famille: application aux pays en dévelopment. Chapter 90 in G. Caselli, J. Vallin and G. Wunsch,Démographie Analyse et Synthèse, Vol. VI. Paris: INED (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pran, D. and K. DePaul (eds). 1999.Children of Cambodias Killing Fields: Memoirs by Survivors. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M. and R. Wong. 1994. Covariates of household extension in rural India: change over time.Journal of Marriage and the Family 56: 853–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, W. 1960.The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, S. 1996. The effects of demographic change on multigenerational family structure: United States Whites, 1880–1980. Pp. 21–40 in A. Bideau,et al. (eds),Les chemins de la Recherche: les systèmes démographiques du passé. No. 32, Paris: coll. Recherche en sciences humaines (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutstein, S.O. and K. Johnson. 2004. The DHS Wealth Index.DHS Comparative Reports No. 6, Calverton MD: ORC Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampos, G.S. 1970. The population of Cambodia, 1945–1980.Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 48(3): 317–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sliwinsky, M. 1995.Le Génocide Khmer Rouge: Une Analyse Démographique. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.E. 1973. The Thai family: nuclear or extended.Journal of Marriage and the Family 35(1): 136–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, C., F.B. LeClere and S.H. Yeu. 1987. Household extension and reproductive behavior in Taiwan.Journal of Biosocial Science 19: 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, E. 1999.La diversité du monde: structures familiales et modernité. L histoire immediate. Paris: Seuil (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, M. 1989. Changes in Chinese urban family structure.Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2007.World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision. New York.

  • Vimard, P. 2003.Transition démographique et familiale: des théories de la modern isation aux modèles de crise. Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (in French).

  • Vyas, S. and L. Kumaranayake. 2006. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis.Health Policy and Planning 21(6): 459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, E.D. 2003.A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Heuveline.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demont, F., Heuveline, P. Diversity and change in Cambodian households, 1998–2006. Journal of Population Research 25, 287–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033892

Keywords

Navigation