Abstract
Extant ethnographic studies suggest that the nuclear family has been the predominant living arrangement in Cambodia, and the country’s rapid socioeconomic transformation since the early 1990s may have accentuated that dominance. To examine these claims, we analyse here household structure in Cambodia between 1998 and 2006, based on data from the 1998 Census, two nationally-representative surveys (2000 and 2005), and a continuing demographic surveillance system (from 2000 on). Our analysis confirms the large prevalence of nuclear families, but not an unequivocal trend toward their increasing prevalence. First, nuclear families are less prevalent in urban than in rural areas, and nationwide, they appear to have receded slightly between 2000 and 2005. We find that increases in the prevalence of extended households correspond to periods of faster economic growth, and interpret these contrasted trends as signs of tensions during this transitional period in Cambodia. While the nuclear family may still be the cultural norm, a high degree of pragmatism is also evident in the acceptance of other living arrangements, albeit temporary, as required by economic opportunities and housing shortage in urban areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antoine, P., P. Bocquier, A.S. Fall, Y.M. Guisse and J. Nanitelamio. 1995.Les familles Dakaroises face à la crise. Paris: ORSTOM, IFAN and CEPED (in French).
Bongaarts, J. 2001. Household size and composition in the developing world in the 1990s.Population Studies 55(3): 263–279.
Burch, T.K. 1967. The size and structure of families: a comparative analysis of census data.American Sociological Review 32(3): 347–363.
Burch, T.K. 1993. Theories of household formation: progress and challenges.Discussion Paper No. 93-6, University of Western Ontario, Population Studies Center, London, Canada.
Das Gupta, M. 1998. Lifeboat versus corporate ethic: social and demographic implications of stem and joint families. Pp. 444–466 in A. Fauve-Chamoux and E. Ochiai (eds),House and the Stem Family in Eur Asian Perspective. 12th International Economic History Congress. Kyoto: International Research Centre for Japanese Studies.
Derosas, R. and M. Oris (eds). 2002.When Dad Died: Individuals and Families Coping with Distress in Past Societies. Bern: Peter Lang.
Ebihara, M.M. 1968. Svay, a Khmer village in Cambodia. Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York.
Filmer, D. and L.H. Pritchett. 2001. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data or tears: an application to educational enrollment in states of India.Demography 38(1): 115–132.
Ford, D. and J. Harris. 1991. The extended African-American family.Urban League Review 14: 71–83.
Goode, W. 1963.World Revolution and Family Patterns. London: Free Press of Glencoe.
Goody, J. 1971.Technology, Tradition and the State in Africa. London: Oxford University Press.
Goody, J. 1995.The Expansive Moment: The Rise of Social Anthropology in Britain and Africa, 1918–1970. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hammel, E.A. and P. Laslett. 1974. Comparing household structure over time and between cultures.Comparative Studies in Society and History 16: 73–111.
Heuveline, P. 1998. Between one and three million: towards the demographic reconstruction of a decade of Cambodian history (1970–79).Population Studies 52(1): 49–65.
Heuveline, P. and B. Poch. 2006. Do marriages forget their past? Marital stability in post-Khmer Rouge Cambodia.Demography 43(1): 99–125.
Heuveline, P. and B. Poch. 2007. The phoenix population: demographic crisis and rebound in Cambodia.Demography 44(2): 405–426.
Heuveline, P., J.M. Timberlake and F.F. Furstenberg Jr. 2003. Shifting child rearing to single mothers: results from 17 Western nations.Population and Development Review 29(1): 47–71.
Hirschman, C. 1996. Family and household structure in Vietnam: some glimpses from a recent survey.Pacific Affairs 69(2): 229–249.
Hirschman, C. and J. Edwards. 2007. Social change in Southeast Asia. Pp. 4374–4380 in G. Ritzer (ed.),The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Vol. 9. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Huguet, J. 1992. The demographic situation in Cambodia.Asia-Pacific Population Journal 6(4): 79–91.
Kiernan, B. 1996.The Pol Pot Regime, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Knodel, J., S.K. Kim, Z. Zimmer and S. Puch. 2005. Older persons in Cambodia: a profile from the 2004 Survey of Elderly.Population Studies Center Research Report No. 05-576. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Laslett, P. 1988. Family, kinship and collectivity as systems of support in pre-industrial Europe: a consideration of the nuclear-hardship’ hypothesis.Continuity and Change 3(2): 153–175.
Ledgerwood, J.L. 1995. Khmer kinship: the matriliny/matriarchy myth.Journal of Anthropological Research 51(3): 247–262.
Lee, G.R. 1999. Comparative perspectives. Pp. 93–110 in M.B. Sussman, S.K. Steinmetz and G.W. Peterson (eds),Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Second edition. New York: Plenum Press.
Lingat, R. 1952.Les régimes matrimoniaux du sud-est de l Asie: essai de droit compare indochinois. Tome premier: les régimes traditionnels. Paris: Editions de Bocard and Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient (in French).
Martel, G. 1975.Lovea, village des environs d Angkor: Aspects démographiques, économiques, et sociologiques du monde rural cambodgien dans la province de Siem-Réap. Paris: Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient (in French).
Mason, K.O. 1992. Family change and support of the elderly in Asia: what do we know?Asia-Pacific Population Journal 7(3): 13–32.
McDonald, P. 1992. Convergence or compromise in historical change? Pp. 15–30 in E. Berquó and P. Xenos (eds),Family System and Cultural Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
Migozzi, J. 1973.Cambodge: faits et problèmes de population. Paris: CNRS (in French).
Naron, H.C. 2006.Cambodias Macroeconomic Developments in 2006. Phnom Penh: Secretary General Ministry of Economy and Finance, Supreme National Economic Council.
National Institute of Health (NIH). 2001.Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey, 2000. Phnom Penh and Calverton MD: National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health [Cambodia] and ORC Macro.
National Institute of Health (NIH). 2006.Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey, 2005. Phnom Penh and Calverton MD: National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health [Cambodia] and ORC Macro.
National Institute of Statistics (NIS). 1999a.General Census of Cambodia 1998: Analysis of Census Results, Report 1, Fertility and Mortality. Phnom Penh.
National Institute of Statistics (NIS). 1999b.General Population Census of Cambodia 1998. Phnom Penh.
National Institute of Statistics (NIS). 2004.Cambodia Inter-Censal Population Survey, Report 2, Phnom Penh Municipality. Phnom Penh.
Népote, J. 1992.Parenté et organisation sociale dans le Cambodge moderne et contemporain. Geneva: Olizane SA (in French).
Ovesen, J., I.-B. Trankell and J. Ojendal. 1996.When Every Household Is an Island: Social Organization and Power Structures in Rural Cambodia. Uppsala Research Reports in Cultural Anthropology Vol. 15. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Pearson J.L., A.G. Hunter, M.E. Ensminger and S.G. Kellam. 1990. Black grandmothers in multigenerational households: diversity in family structure and parenting involvement in the Woodlawn community.Child Development 61: 434–442.
Pilon, M. 2004. Démographie des ménages et de la famille: application aux pays en dévelopment. Chapter 90 in G. Caselli, J. Vallin and G. Wunsch,Démographie Analyse et Synthèse, Vol. VI. Paris: INED (in French).
Pran, D. and K. DePaul (eds). 1999.Children of Cambodias Killing Fields: Memoirs by Survivors. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ram, M. and R. Wong. 1994. Covariates of household extension in rural India: change over time.Journal of Marriage and the Family 56: 853–864.
Rostow, W. 1960.The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruggles, S. 1996. The effects of demographic change on multigenerational family structure: United States Whites, 1880–1980. Pp. 21–40 in A. Bideau,et al. (eds),Les chemins de la Recherche: les systèmes démographiques du passé. No. 32, Paris: coll. Recherche en sciences humaines (in French).
Rutstein, S.O. and K. Johnson. 2004. The DHS Wealth Index.DHS Comparative Reports No. 6, Calverton MD: ORC Macro.
Stampos, G.S. 1970. The population of Cambodia, 1945–1980.Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 48(3): 317–360.
Sliwinsky, M. 1995.Le Génocide Khmer Rouge: Une Analyse Démographique. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan (in French).
Smith, H.E. 1973. The Thai family: nuclear or extended.Journal of Marriage and the Family 35(1): 136–141.
Stokes, C., F.B. LeClere and S.H. Yeu. 1987. Household extension and reproductive behavior in Taiwan.Journal of Biosocial Science 19: 273–282.
Todd, E. 1999.La diversité du monde: structures familiales et modernité. L histoire immediate. Paris: Seuil (in French).
Tsui, M. 1989. Changes in Chinese urban family structure.Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 737–747.
United Nations. 2007.World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision. New York.
Vimard, P. 2003.Transition démographique et familiale: des théories de la modern isation aux modèles de crise. Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (in French).
Vyas, S. and L. Kumaranayake. 2006. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis.Health Policy and Planning 21(6): 459–468.
Weitz, E.D. 2003.A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demont, F., Heuveline, P. Diversity and change in Cambodian households, 1998–2006. Journal of Population Research 25, 287–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033892
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033892