Abstract
THIS PAPER discusses Mapping Temporal Relations of Discussions Software (MTRDS), a Web-based application that visually represents the temporal relations of online discussions. MTRDS was used to observe interaction characteristics of three online discussions. In addition, the research employed the Practical Inquiry Model to identify indices of cognitive presence in discussions. MTRDS made the topology of discussions apparent as well as individual user communication patterns. The results of this inquiry appear encouraging in terms of the software’s utility. The three discussions analyzed did not exhibit the four phases of the Practical Inquiry Model. Most discussion occurred at a questioning or elaboration level. However, two discussions showed evidence of higher cognitive processing in terms of students synthesizing and integrating ideas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aviv, R. (2000). Educational performance of ALN via content analysis.The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4 (2). Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/Vol4_issue2/le/reuven/ LE-reuven.htm.
Boyd, D. Lee, H-Y, Ramage, D, & Donath, J. (2002). Developing Legible Visualizations for Online Social Spaces.Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. January, 2002, Computer Society Press, 2002. 10 pages.
Donath, J., Karahalios, K., & Viegas, F. (1999)., Visualizing conversation. Journal ofComputer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/donath.html.
Duffy, T. M., Dueber, B., & Hawley, C. L. (1998). Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In Bonk, C. J., & King K. S. (Eds.).Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Fisher, D., & P. Dourish. (2004). Social and temporal structures in everyday collaboration.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Vienna, Austria, pp. 551–558.
Garrison, R, Anderson, T, & Archer, W. (2001). Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education.The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
Hara, N., Bonk, C., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content Analysis of Online Discussion in an Applied Educational Psychology Course.Instructional Science, 28, 115–152.
Heckman, R., & Annabi, H. (2005). A content analytic comparison of learning processes in online and face-to-face case study discussions.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2), article 7. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://jcmc. indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/heckman.html.
Herring, S.C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html.
Herring, S.C. (1996). Two variant of an electronic message schema. In S. C. Herring (Ed.),Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 81–106). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins.
Hewitt, J., & Teplovs, C. (1999). An Analysis of Growth Patterns in Computer Conferencing Threads. InProceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference, C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Dec. 12–15, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California (pp. 232–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hickson, M., Stacks, D.W., & Moore, N.J. (2004).Nonverbal communication: Studies and applications (4th ed.). Los Angles, California: Roxbury Publishing Company.
Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer-mediated communication courses.Instructional Science, 24, 47–69.
Jeong, A. (2005).Methods and tools for the computational analysis of group interaction and argumentation in asynchronous online group discussions. Paper presented at the Learning and Technology Symposium at New York University, New York, NY, April 1, 2005. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://dev22448-01.sp01.fsu.edu/Research/Proposals/ LearnTechSymposium/MethodsToolsAnalyzingInteraction_Jeong2005.pdf. [2005, May, 24]
Kalman, Y.M., & Rafaeli, S. (2005). Email chronemics: Unobtrusive profiling on response time.Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January, 2005, Computer Society Press, 2005. 10 pages.
Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (2001).Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pawan, F., Paulus, T., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers.Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 119–140.
Smith, M., & Fiore, A. (2001). Visualization components for persistent conversations.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Seattle, WA, March 31–April 5, pp. 136–143.
Walther, J.B., & Tidwell, L.C. (1995). Nonverbal Cues in Computer-Mediated Communications, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication.Journal of Organization Computing, 5(4), 355–378.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
ABOUT THE AUTHOR William J. Gibbs is an Associate Professor in the Department of Interactive Media of Duquesne University where he teaches courses in multimedia, instructional design, and online learning. He received his PhD in Instructional Systems from The Pennsylvania State University. For the past several years, he has offered technology courses via the Internet. His research interests include knowledge acquisition, technology-based learning environments, computer-mediated communications, and methods for effective instructional software evaluation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibbs, W.J. Visualizing interaction patterns in online discussions and indices of cognitive presence. J. Comput. High. Educ. 18, 30–54 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032723
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032723

