Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Inside or outside? The role of the WTO in the settlement of the transatlantic trade dispute on GMOs

  • Articles
  • WTO
  • Published:
Intereconomics

Abstract

The looming transatlantic trade war over genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has revived the debate on the appropriateness of the WTO.1 In this article, it is asserted that the present WTO remains the appropriate forum for addressing the GM dispute as its science-based approach harmonises members' food safety concerns with free trade interests. Calls for the recognition of consumer preferences by the WTO severely underestimate the dangers of disguised producer protectionism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chantal Thomas: Trade-Related Labor and Environment Agreements?, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2002, pp. 791–797, 817–819; Daniel C. Esty: Greening the GATT: trade, environment, and the future, Washington D.C. 1994, Institute for International Economics; Bernard M. Hoekman, Michel M. Kosteckl: The Political Economy of the Worid Trading System. The WTO and Beyond, 2nd ed. Oxford 2001, Oxford University Press, pp. 186, 195, 444, 449–451; Trish Kelly: The WTO, the Environment and Health and Safety Standards, in: The World Economy, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2003, pp. 132–133.

  2. Chantal Thomas, op. cit., Trade-Related Labor and Environment Agreements?, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2002, pp. 811–812; Daniel C. Esty, Damien Geradin: Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness. A Conceptual Framework, in: Journal of World Trade, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1998, pp. 7, 46; Bernard M. Hoekman, Peter Holmes: Competition Policy, Developing Countries and the WTO, in: The World Economy, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1999, pp. 886–892.

  3. Daniel C. Esty, Damien Geradin, op. cit. Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness. A Conceptual Framework, in: Journal of World Trade, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1998, pp. 7, 46.

  4. Ibid., Daniel C. Esty, Damien Geradin, op. cit. Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness. A Conceptual Framework, in: Journal of World Trade, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1998, pp. 5–7, fn. 7–9, pp. 22–46; Daniel C. Esty, Damien Geradin: Regulatory Competition in Focus, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2000, p. 237.

  5. See reference in: Kym Anderson: Environmental and Labor Standards: What Role for the WTO?, in: Kym Anderson, Bernard Hoekman (eds.): The Global Trading System. Vol. 4: “New” Issues for the WTO, London, New York 2002, I.B. Tauris Publishers, pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jim Rollo, Alan Winters: Subsidiary Challenges for the WTO: Environmental and Labor Standards, in: The World Economy, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2000, p. 569; Gary P. Sampson: Trade, Environment, and the WTO: The Post-Seattle Agenda. Baltimore 2000, The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 18–19.

  7. Bernard M. Hoekman, Michel M. Kostecki, op. cit.,, pp. 441–442; Jim Rollo, Alan Winters, op. cit., Subsidiary Challenges for the WTO: Environmental and Labor Standards, in: The World Economy, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2000, p. 562–563, 567.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Claude Martin: The relationship between trade and environment regimes: What needs to change?, in: Gary P. Sampson: The Role of the World Trade Organization in Global Governance. Tokyo, New York, Paris 2001, The United Nations University Press, p. 143; Peter Singer: one world. the ethics of globalization, New Haven, London 2002, Yale University Press, pp. 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ian M. Sheldon: Regulation of Biotechnology: Will We Ever Freely Trade GMOs?, in: European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2002, pp. 155–160. See, for instance, the latest environmental risk assessment of three herbicide-tolerant GM crops on behalf of the UK government. Press release of 16 October 2003, available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2003/031016a.htm (last accessed 25 January 2004).

  10. See figures in: Peter W. B. Phillips: Policy, National Regulation, and International Standards for GM Foods. Research at a Glance. Brief 1, Washington D.C. 2003 International Food Policy Research Institute, p. 2. Available at:http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/rag/br1001/biotechbr1.pdf (last accessed 25 January 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kym Anderson, Chantal Nielsen: Economic Effects of Agricultural Biotechnology. Research in the Presence of Price-distorting Policies. Working Paper, Adelaide 2002. Centre for International Economic Studies, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kevin Kennedy: Resolving International Sanitary and Phytosanitary Disputes in the WTO: Lessons and Future Directions, in: Food and Drug Law Journal, Vol. 55, 2000, pp. 84–88; Mark A. Pollack, Gregory C. Shaffer: The Challenge of Reconciling Regulatory Differences: Food Safety and GMOs in the Transatlantic Relationship, in: Mark A. Pollack, Gregory C. Shaffer (eds.): Transatlantic Governance in Global Economy, Lanham, Maryland 2001, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, p. 160.

  13. Kevin Kennedy, op. cit., Resolving International Sanitary and Phytosanitary Disputes in the WTO: Lessons and Future Directions, in: Food and Drug Law Journal, Vol. 55, 2000, pp. 90–92.

  14. Ronald Bailey: The Looming Trade War over Plant Biotechnology, Trade Policy Analysis No. 18, Working Paper, Washington D.C. 2002, Cato Institute's Center for Trade Policy Studies, pp. 12–14. Available at:http://www.freetrade.org/pubs/pas/tpa-018.pdf (last accessed 25 January 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas Cottier: Risk management experience in WTO dispute settlement, in: David Robertson, Aynsley Kellow (eds.): Globalization and the Environment: Risk Assessment and the WTO, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton MA 2001, Edward Elgar, pp. 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ronald Bailey, op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nicholas Perdikis, William A. Kerr, Jill E. Hobbs: Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in the Genetically Modified Goods, in: The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 381–382.

  19. Ibid. Nicholas Perdikis, William A. Kerr, Jill E. Hobbs: Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in the Genetically Modified Goods, in: The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 381–382.

  20. Grant E. Isaac, William A. Kerr: Genetically Modified Organisms and Trade Rules: Identifying Important Challenges for the WTO, in: The World Economy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2003, p. 32: Mark A. Pollack, Gregory C. Shaffer, op. cit. The Challenge of Reconciling Regulatory Differences: Food Safety and GMOs in the Transatlantic Relationship, in: Mark A. Pollack, Gregory C. Shaffer (eds.): Transatiantic Governance in Global Economy, Lanham, Maryland 2001, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, p. 174–175.

  21. Jeffrey Atik: Science and international regulatory convergence, in: Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 2/3, 1996/7, pp. 737.

  22. Nicholas Perdikis, William A. Kerr, Jill E. Hobbs, op. cit. Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in the Genetically Modified Goods, in: The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 381–382.

  23. Ronald Bailey, op. cit., pp. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bernard M. Hoekman, Michel M. Kostecki, op. cit., pp. 455–458; Mark A. Poliack, Gregory C. Shaffer, op. cit. The Challenge of Reconciling Regulatory Differences: Food Safety and GMOs in the Transatlantic Relationship, in: Mark A. Pollack, Gregory C. Shaffer (eds.). Transatlantic Governance in Global Economy, Lanham, Maryland 2001, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 174–175.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kym Anderson, Chantal Nielsen, op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nicholas Perdikis, William A. Kerr, Jill E. Hobbs, op. cit. Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in the Genetically Modified Goods, in: The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 381–382.

  27. Ronald Bailey, op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gary P. Sampson, op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. Buckingham, P. Phillips: Hot potato, hot potato: Regulating products of biotechnology by the international community, in: Journal of World Trade, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2001, pp. 9, 25–29.

  30. Theofanis Christoforou: Settlement of Science-based Trade Disputes in the WTO: A Critical Review of the Developing Case Law in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty, in: New York University Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2000, pp. 622–630, 638–639.

  31. D. Buckingha, P. Phillips, op. cit. Hot potato, hot potato: Regulating products of biotechnology by the international community, in: Journal of World Trade, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2001, pp. 9, 25–29.

  32. Question 20 (What is WHO doing to improve the evaluation of GM foods?), in: 20 Questions on Genetically Modified (GM) Foods. Avallable at: http://www.who.int/fsf/Documents/20_Questions/q&a.pdf (last accessed 25 January 2004).

  33. Theofanis Christoforou, op. cit. Settlement of Science-based Trade Disputes in the WTO: A Critical Review of the Developing Case Law in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty, in: New York University Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2000, pp. 622–630, 638–639.

  34. Dirk De Bièvre: Redesigning the Virtuous Circle: Two Proposals for the World Trade Organization Reform. Resolving and Preventing United States-European Union, and other Trade Disputes, in: Journal of World Trade, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2002, pp. 1006–1009; Claude Barfield: WTO Dispute Settlement System in Need of Change, in: INTERECO-NOMICS, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2002, pp. 132–134.

  35. Mark A. Pollack, Gregory C. Shaffer, Mark A. Pollack Gregory C. Shaffer,, p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nicholas Perdikis, William A. Kerr, Jill E. Hobbs, op. cit. Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in the Genetically Modified Goods, in: The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 394–395.

  37. Ibid. Nicholas Perdikis, William A. Kerr, Jill E. Hobbs, op. cit. Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in the Genetically Modified Goods, in: The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 394–395.

  38. Ibid. Nicholas Perdikis, William A. Kerr, Jill E. Hobbs, op. cit., Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in the Genetically Modified Goods, in: The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 394–395.

  39. Dirk De Bièvre, op. cit. Redesigning the Virtuous Circle: Two Proposals for the World Trade Organization Reform. Resolving and Preventing United States-European Union, and other Trade Disputes, in: Journal of World Trade, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2002, pp. 1006–1009.

  40. Ian M. Sheldon, op. cit., Regulation of Biotechnology: Will We Ever Freely Trade GMOs?, in European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2002, pp. 155–160., pp. 173 ff.

  41. Nicholas Perdikis, William A. Kerr, Jill E. Hobbs, op. cit., Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in the Genetically Modified Goods, in: The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 381–382. pp 395 ff.

  42. Ibid. Nicholas Perdikis, William A. Kerr, Jill E. Hobbs, op. cit., Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in the Genetically Modified Goods, in: The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 381–382. pp 395 ff.

  43. Ronald Bailey, op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  44. Peter Singer, op. cit., one world. the ethics of globalization, New Haven, London 2002, Yale University Press, pp. 57–70.

  45. Ibid. Peter Singer, op. cit., one world. the ethics of globalization, New Haven, London 2002, Yale University Press, pp. 57–70.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Superior Court of Justice of Berlin, Germany

    Matthias Gruber (Junior Lawyer)

Authors
  1. Matthias Gruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This article is a revised version of a paper written during the author's sojourn at the Central European University, Budapest, Hungary. The author wishes to express his thanks to Professor László Csaba, Department of International Relations and European Studies, Central European University, for his assistance and helpful comments.

See: Forum. New Transatlantic Trade War, in: INTERECONOMICS, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2002, pp. 124–137.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruber, M. Inside or outside? The role of the WTO in the settlement of the transatlantic trade dispute on GMOs. Intereconomics 39, 36–45 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032205

Keywords

Search

Navigation