Journal of Population Research

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 65–74 | Cite as

Prospects for international migration: Globalization and its discontents



The paper challenges the view that the late twentieth century is the ‘age of migration’. For developing countries, flows of out-migrants are small compared with population growth, although in developed countries the stock of immigrants increased in proportion to the total population between 1965 and 1990. Despite the importance of refugee movement, the main force for international migration is economic. Why do not more people migrate (internally and internationally) to take advantage of potential economic gains? For international migration, one deterrent is institutional barriers against uncontrolled immigration. Different interest groups stand to gain or lose from increased migration. The income-enhancing effects of unhindered international labour migration, measured jointly for sending and receiving countries and by extension globally, should be very large. Even partial liberalization of immigration to industrialized countries would serve developing countries well. In industrialized countries, however, there is concern about the effect of massive labour inflows on the ethnic, religious and cultural composition of the population and its social cohesion. In some countries, migration is leading to greater ethnic mingling; in others there is a recrudescence of nationalistic aspirations for independent statehood with ethnically homogeneous populations, or to preserve the advantages of economically successful subregions.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boniface, Pascal. 1998. The proliferation of states.Washington Quarterly 21(3): 111–127.Google Scholar
  2. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1983.Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Adviser 1977–1981. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.Google Scholar
  3. Castles, Stephen and Mark J. Miller. 1996.The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Franklin, Benjamin. 1985 [1755]. Observations concerning the Increase of Mankind and the Peopling of Countries. First published 1755. Reprinted 1985 inArchives, Population and Development Review 11(1): 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamilton, Bob and John Whalley. 1984. Efficiency and distributional implications of global restrictions on labour mobility.Journal of Development Economics 14: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jefferson, Thomas. 1993 [1785]. Notes on the State of Virginia. First published 1785. Chapter on population reprinted 1993 inArchives, Population and Development Review 19(1): 175–180.Google Scholar
  7. Kennan, George F. 1993.Around the Cragged Hill: A Personal and Political Philosophy. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  8. McNeill, William H. 1984. Human migration in historical perspective.Population and Development Review 10(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1993.Pandaemonium. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Simon, Julian. 1990.The Economic Consequences of Immigration. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. United Nations. 1997.The World Social Report. New York.Google Scholar
  12. United Nations. 2001.World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision. New York.Google Scholar
  13. United Nations. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 1995.The State of the World’s Refugees: In Search of Solutions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Zlotnik, Hania. 1998. International migration 1965–96: an overview.Population and Development Review 24(3): 429–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Population CouncilNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations