Skip to main content
Log in

The changing spatial distribution and concentration of Australias chinese and Vietnamese communities: An analysis of 1986–2006 Australian population census data

  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the changing spatial distribution and concentration of Chinese and Vietnamese communities in Australia over the two past decades. The research analyses data of individuals (i) born in the People’s Republic of China or Vietnam, (ii) of Chinese or Vietnamese ancestry, and (iii) who spoke Chinese or Vietnamese languages at home. Basic demographic and economic factors at the SLA level are considered to provide an initial discussion of meso-level factors which may have contributed to changes in Chinese-and Vietnamese-Australian distributions and concentrations since 1986.

As expected, from field observations, the data reveal a contrasting picture of the spatial distribution and concentration of the Chinese- and Vietnamese-Australian communities, and indicate that although a few areas of high Vietnamese spatial concentration have persisted into 2006, and a few areas of high’ Chinese spatial concentration have developed since 1986, overall there is an increasing dispersion of both communities into the broader Australian community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birrell, B. 1993. Ethnic concentrations: the Vietnamese experience.People and Place 1(1): 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J.D. Jr. 1981. Psychological adaptation and dysfunction among refugees.International Migration Review 15(1/2): 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1988. The ethnicity of Australia’s Indochinese communities. Paper presented at the 4th National Conference of the Australian Population Association, Queensland University, St Lucia, Brisbane, 31 August–2 September.

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1989a.The Spatial Distribution and Concentration of Australias Three Indochinese-Born Communities: 1976–1986. Australia-Asia Papers No. 44. Brisbane: Centre for the Study of Australia-Asia Relations, Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1989b. Asian-Australians-their ancestry and birthplace: a preliminary analysis of the 1986 Census data. Paper presented at the 8th New Zealand Conference on Asian Studies, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 17–19 Augus

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1990.A Comparative Analysis of the Ethnicity, English Proficiency and Religion of Australias Three Indochinese-Born Communities: 1976–1986, Australia-Asia Papers No. 54. Brisbane: Centre for the Study of Australia-Asia Relations, Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1991a. A demographic and socio-economic profile of the ASEAN-born communities in Australia: results from the 1986 Census.Asian Migrant 4(1):14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1991b. A demographic and socio-economic profile of six ethnic-Chinese Asianborn communities in Australia: a brief overview from the 1986 Census. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference of Historians of Asia. Hong Kong, 24–28 June.

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1992a. (ed.).The Diverse Asians: A Profile of Six Asian Communities in Australia. Australia-Asia Papers. Brisbane: Centre for the Study of Australia-Asia Relations, Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1992b. A comparative profile of overseas-born ethnic Chinese communities in AustraliaJournal of Overseas Chinese Studies 2: 183–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1994. Born to search for the Promised Land: the determinants of economic self-sufficiency of Vietnamese immigrants in Melbourne, Australia. Ph.D thesis, School of Modern Asian Studies, Faculty of Asian and International Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1998a. The changing characteristics of Chinese migrants to Australia during the 1980s and early 1990s. Pp. 299–345 in E. Sinn (ed.),The Last Half Century of Overseas Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1998b. Occupational mobility in Australia’s Vietnamese community: its direction and human capital determinants.International Migration Review 32(1): 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. 1999. The Chinese in Australia: a socio-economic profile based on the 1996 Census. Paper presented at Chinese Identities — The Sixth Biennial Conference of the Chinese Studies Association of Australia Conference, Murdoch University, Perth, 8–10 July.

  • Coughlan, J.E. 2008a. The changing spatial distribution and concentration of Australia’s Vietnamese communities: transformations over the past twenty years — an analysis of 1986–2006 Australian Population Census data. Paper presented at the 14th Biennial Australian Population Association Conference, Alice Springs, 30 June–3 July.

  • Coughlan, J.E. 2008b. The changing spatial distribution and concentration of Australia’s Chinese communities: transformations over the past twenty years — an analysis of 1986–2006 Australian Population Census data. Paper presented at the 14th Biennial Australian Population Association Conference, Alice Springs, 30 June–3 July.

  • Coughlan, J.E. and C.H. Ho. 1997. The Chinese in Australia: immigrants from the People’s Republic of China, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau. Pp. 120–170 in J.E. Coughlan and D.J. McNamara (eds),Asians in Australia: Patterns of Migration and Settlement. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J.E. and D.J. McNamara (eds). 1997.Asians in Australia: Patterns of Migration and Settlement. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, P.F. 1938. Population succession in Chicago: 1898–1930.American Journal of Sociology 44(1): 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darroch, A.G. and W.G. Marston. 1971. The social class basis of ethnic residential segregation: the Canadian case.American Journal of Sociology 77(3): 491–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs. 1981.Ethnic Distribution 1976. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs. 1986.Ethnic Distribution 1981. Canberra.

  • Dunn, K.M. 1998. Rethinking ethnic concentrations: Cabramatta, the case of Sydney.Urban Studies 35(3): 503–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, C.R. 2008. Bifurcation, fragmentation or integration: the racial and geographical structure of US metropolitan segregation, 1990–2000.Urban Studies 45(3): 467–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fieldhouse, E.A. 1999. Ethnic minority unemployment and spatial mismatch: the case of London.Urban Studies 36(9): 1569–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R.G. 1950. Population succession in Chicago.American Journal of Sociology 56(2): 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, J. and R. Johnston. 2001. The geography of the new ethnicity: ethnic residential segregation in Metropolitan Sydney 1996.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92(1): 42–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, J. and M. Poulsen. 2003. Multiculturalism and the spatial assimilation of migrant groups: the Melbourne and Sydney experiences. Paper presented at the State of Australian Cities National Conference, Carlton Hotel, Parramatta, 3–5 December.

  • Healy, E. and B. Birrell. 2003. Metropolis divided: the political dynamic of spatial inequality and migrant settlement in Sydney.People and Place 11(2): 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, C., S. Gunasekaran, G. Sullivan and C.T. Wu (eds). 1992.Asians in Australia: The Dynamics of Migration and Settlement. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, L. and K. Pookong. 1999.The Asianisation of Australia? Some Facts about the Myths. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., J. Forrest and M. Poulsen. 2001a. Sydney’s ethnic geography: new approaches to analysing patterns of residential concentration.Australian Geographer 32(2): 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., J. Forrest and M. Poulsen. 2001b. The geography of an EthniCity: residential segregation of birthplace and language groups in Sydney, 1996.Housing Studies 16(5): 569–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., J. Forrest and M. Poulsen. 2002. The ethnic geography of EthniCities: the ‘American model’ and residential concentration in London.Ethnicities 2(2): 209–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., M. Poulsen and J. Forrest. 2005. On the measurement and meaning of residential segregation: a response to Simpson.Urban Studies 42(7): 1221–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, C. and D. Mar. 1982. Desired residential mobility in a low income ethnic community: a case study of Chinatown.Journal of Social Issues 38(3): 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J. 1981.Ethnic Communities in Melbourne: An Atlas of the Overseas Born Population. Melbourne: Department of Geography, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. 1979. Refugees: their mental health needs. Testimony presented to the Immigration, Refugees and International Law Subcommittee of the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives (USA), 10 May.

  • Miller, B., E.B. Chambers and C.M. Coleman. 1981. Indo-Chinese refugees: a national mental health need assessment.Migration Today 9(2): 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musterd, S. 2003. Segregation and integration: a contested relationship.Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 29(4): 623–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musterd, S., H. Priemus and R. van Kempen. 1999. Towards undivided cities: the potential of economic revitalisation and housing redifferentiation.Housing Studies 14(5): 573–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen, M., R. Johnston and J. Forrest. 2004. Is Sydney a divided city ethnically?Australian Geographical Studies 42(3): 356–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taeuber, K.E. and A.F. Taeuber. 1964. The Negro as an immigrant group: recent trends in racial and ethnic segregation.American Journal of Sociology 69(4): 374–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kempen, R. and A.S. Özüekren. 1998. Ethnic segregation in cities: new forms and explanations in a dynamic world.Urban Studies 35(10): 1631–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani, N. 1984a.The Vietnamese in Australia: New Problems in Old Forms. Brisbane: Centre for the Study of Australian-Asian Relations, Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viviani, N. 1984b.The Long Journey: Vietnamese Migration and Settlement in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viviani, N. 1996.The Indochinese in Australia 1975–1995, from Burnt Boats to Barbecues. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viviani, N., J.E. Coughlan and T. Rowland. 1993.Indochinese in Australia: The Issues of Employment and Residential Concentration (Report to the Bureau of Immigration Research). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Coughlan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coughlan, J.E. The changing spatial distribution and concentration of Australias chinese and Vietnamese communities: An analysis of 1986–2006 Australian population census data. Journal of Population Research 25, 161–182 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031947

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031947

Keywords

Navigation