Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Demography and gender regimes: The case of Italians and ethnic traditions

  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In proposing measures that might improve adverse projected population futures, many demographers have endorsed feminist demands for family-friendly social policies and gender equity in the home. This paper provides a constructive critique of some versions of this argument. Without presenting new empirical data, it makes a case for the use of alternative conceptual tools in study design. It does so by focusing on three underpinnings of claims that fertility is lowest in countries with the greatest disparity between public and private patriarchy. Using Italy and Italians as an example, the paper discusses empirical measurements of the domestic division of labour, depictions of Italian family traditions and theorizations of family dynamics more generally, and wider understandings of modernity and tradition, both on the canvas of grand theory and within ethnographies of Italian families. The paper concludes with examples of studies that use the suggested conceptual framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. and P. McDonald. 2000. Fertility and multiculturalism: immigrant fertility in Australia, 1977–1991.International Migration Review 34(1): 215–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addis, E. 2000. Gender in the reform of the Italian welfare state. Pp. 122–149 in M.J. Gonzáles, T. Jurado and M. Naldini (eds),Gender Inequalities in Southern Europe: Women, Work and Welfare in the 1990s. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, G. 1992. Theories of fertility decline: a nonspecialist's guide to the current debate. Pp. 13–27 in J.R. Gillis, L.A. Tilly and D. Levine (eds),The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850–1970. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, F., R.A. Bulatao, C. Buripakdiet al. 1975.The Value of Children: A Cross-National Study. Honolulu: East-West Population Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1999. Work — Unpaid work: how couples share domestic work.Australian Social Trends 1999. <http://www.abs.gov.au>. Accessed: 8 March 2004.

  • Barbagli, M. 1991a. Marriage and the family in the early nineteenth century. Pp. 92–127 in J.A. Davis and P. Ginsborg (eds),Society and Politics in the Age of the Risorgimento. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbagli, M. 1991b. Three household formation systems in eighteenth- and nineteenthcentury Italy. Pp. 255–269 in D.I. Kertzer and R.P. Sallar (eds),The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, C. 1996. Madrie padri: due tempi, due organizzazioni. Organizzazione domestica e ‘scelte’ demografiche [Mothers and fathers: two times, two organizations. Domestic organization and demographic ‘choices’].Inchiesta 26(111): 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F. and P. Villa. 1998. A Mediterraean perspective on the breakdown of the relationship between participation and fertility.Cambridge Journal of Economics 22(2): 137–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F. and P. Villa. 2000. To what extent does it pay to be better educated? Education and the work market for women in Italy. Pp. 150–170 in M.J. Gonzáles., T. Jurado and M. Naldini (eds),Gender Inequalities in Southern Europe: Women, Work and Welfare in the 1990s. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M. 1999. Parenthood without penalty: time use in public policy in Australia and Finland.Feminist Economics 5(3): 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M. 2000. Issues in the design of time-use surveys for collecting data on paid and unpaid work. Expert Group Meeting on methods for conducting time-use surveys. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blim, M. 2001. Italian women after development: employment, entrepreneurship, and domestic work in the Third Italy.History of the Family 6: 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracher, M. and G. Santow. 1995. Traditional families and fertility decline: lessons from Australia's southern Europeans.Stockholm Research Papers in Demography no. 90. University of Stockholm.

  • Caldwell, J. C. 1980. Mass education as a determinant of the timing of fertility decline.Population and Development Review 6(2): 225–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. 1998. Explanation in historical sociology: narrative, general theory, and historically specific theory.American Journal of Sociology 104(3): 846–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. 1993. Nationalism and ethnicity.Annual Review of Sociology 19: 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesnais, J.-C. 1996. Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary western Europe.Population and Development Review 22(4): 729–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesnais, J.-C. and C. Verstraete. 1996. Le paradoxe féministe.Le Débat Sept–Oct.: 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioni, E., P. Giovannini and A. Perulli. 1999. Emplois du temps et identités territoriales: travail et non-travail en Italie [The use of time and territorial identity: work and time off in Italy].Sociologia del Lavoro 74–75: 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B. 2001.The Politics of Population: State Formation, Statistics, and the Census of Canada, 1840–1875. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeny P. 1988. Social science and population policy.Population and Development Review 14(3): 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, W.A. 1991. The joint family household in eighteenth-century Italian society. Pp. 286–303. in D.I. Kertzer and R.P. Sallar (eds),The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. and R. Edwards (eds). 1997.Single Mothers in an International Context: Mothers or Workers? London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S.N. 2000. Multiple modernities.Daedalus 129(1): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eley, G. 1981. Nationalism and social history.Social History 6(1): 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. 1990.The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.). 1996.Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargion, V. 2001. Italy: moving from the southern model. Pp. 183–202 in P. Alcock and G. Craig (eds),International Social Policy: Welfare Regimes in the Developed World. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, D.B., S. Okun and S. Segal. 1999. The demographic transition then and now: processes, perspectives, and analyses.Journal of Family History 24(4): 493–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D., M. Hechter and S. Kanazawa. 1999. Theories of the value of children: a new approach. Pp. 19–50 in R. Leete (ed.),Dynamics of Values in Fertility Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goankar, D. P. (ed.). 2001.Alternative Modernities. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzáles, M.J., T. Jurado and M. Naldini (eds). 2000.Gender Inequalities in Southern Europe: Women, Work and Welfare in the 1990s. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenhalgh, S. 1996. The social construction of population science: an intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth century demography.Comparative Studies in Society and History 38(1): 27–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, J. and M. Naldini. 1997. Is the south so different? Italian and Spanish families in comparative perspective. Pp. 42–66 in M. Rhodes (eds.),Southern European Welfare States: Between Crisis and Reform. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitlinger, A. 1993.Women's Equality, Demography and Public Policies. New York: St, Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. 1992.Nations and Nationalism since 1780. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. and T. Ranger (eds). 1983.The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D.R. 1989.Cultural Disenchantments: Worker Peasantries in Northeast Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, G. 2000. Declining fertility and policy intervention in Europe: some lessons for Australia?Journal of Population Research 17(2): 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ironmonger, D. 1996. Counting outputs, capital inputs and caring labour: estimating gross household product.Feminist Economics 2(3): 37–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasnitz, D.B. 1981.Work, Gender and Health among Southern Italian Immigrants in Melbourne, Australia, vols I and II. London: University of London, Microfilms International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, D.I. 1995. Political-economic and cultural explanations of demographic behaviour. Pp. 29–52 in S. Greenhalgh (ed.),Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, D.I. and D. Arel. 2002. Censuses, identity formation and the struggle for political power. Pp. 1–42 in D.I. Kertzer and D. Arel (eds),Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, D.I. and D.P. Hogan 1989.Family, Political Economy, and Demographic Change. The Transformation of Life in Casalecchio, Italy, 1861–1921. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S. and J. Shu. 1996.Migrant Family Formation Patterns in Australia. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, H.-P., F.C. Billari and J.A. Ortega. 2002. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s.Population and Development Review 28(4): 641–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, E.L. 1999. Natalism and nationalism: the political economy of love, labor, and low fertility in central Italy. PhD thesis, University of Arizona. Ann Arbor UMI Dissertation Services 2001 photocopy.

  • Krause, E.L. 2001. ‘Empty cradles’ and the quiet revolution: demographic discourse and cultural struggles of gender, race, and class in Italy.Cultural Anthropology 16(4): 576–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. 1997. New directions for the study of Australia's fertility decline.Journal of the Australian Population Association 14(1): 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R.W. and S. Verma. 1999. How children and adolescents spend time across the world: work, play, and developmental opportunities.Psychological Bulletin 125(6): 701–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livi-Bacci, M. 2001. Too few children and too much family.Daedalus 130(3): 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, R. In press. Childcare as citizenship right: Toronto in the 1970s and 1980s.Canadian Historical Review, forthcoming.

  • Matthews, B.J. 1999. The gender system and fertility: an exploration of the hidden links.Canadian Studies in Population 26(1): 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. 2005. Gender equity in theories of fertility.Population and Development Review 26(3): 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. and R. Kippen. 1999. Population futures for Australia: the policy alternatives.Research Paper 5. Canberra: Department of the Parliamentary Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menniti, A., R. Palomba and L.L. Sabbadini. 1997. Italy: changing the family from within. Pp. 225–252 in F.-X. Kaufmannet al., (ed),Family Life and Family Policies in Europe Vol. 1,Structures and Trends in the 1980s. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelli, G. 2000. Kinship, family and social network: the anthropological embeddedment of fertility change in Southern EuropeDemographic Research 3(13). <www.demographic-research.org>.

  • Miller, P. 1998.Transformations of Patriarchy in the West, 1500–1900. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. 2002. Tradition, modernity and Italian babies.Histoire Sociale/ Social History 35(69): 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingione, E. 1995. Labour marker segmentation and informal work in southern Europe.European Urban and Regional Studies 2(2): 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. 1997. Challengingmeridionalismo: constructing a new history for southern Italy. Pp. 1–19 in R. Lumley and J. Morris (eds),The New History of the Italian South: The Mezzogiorno Revisited. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, J.S., A.S. Orloff and S. Shaver. 1999.States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orloff, A.S. 1996. Gender and the welfare state.Annual Review of Sociology 22: 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orloff, A.S. 2002.Women's Employment and Welfare Regimes: Globalization, Export Orientation and Social Policy in Europe and America. Social Policy and Development Programme Paper 12. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passerini, L. 1994. The interpretation of democracy in the Italian women's movement of the 1970s and 1980s.Women's Studies International Forum 17(2–3): 235–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passerini, L. 1996.Autobiography of a Generation: Italy, 1968. Hanover NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, J.E. and E. Townsley. 1998. Wives' and husbands' housework reporting: gender, class, and social desirability.Gender and Society 12(2): 188–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, K. and M. Jolly. 1998.Maternities and Modernities: Colonial and Postcolonial Experiences in Asia and the Pacific. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reher, D. 1998. Family ties in western Europe: persistent contrasts.Population and Development Review 24(2): 203–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (ed.). 1997.Southern European Welfare States: Between Crisis and Reform. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini, E. 2000. Social rights of women with children: lone mothers and poverty in Italy, Germany and Great Britain. Pp. 89–121 in M.J. Gonzáles, T. Jurado and M. Naldini (eds),Gender Inequalities in Southern Europe: Women, Work and Welfare in the 1990s. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santow, G. and M. Bracher. 1999. Traditional families and fertility decline: lessons from Australia's southern Europeans. Pp. 51–77 in R. Leete (ed.),Dynamics of Values in Fertility Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, C. 1997. Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare. Pp. 81–100 inOECD Social Policy Studies 21: Family, Market and Community. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, C. 2000. Being young in Italy: the paradoxes of a familistic society.European Journal of Social Quality 2(2): 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. 1999.Guests and Aliens. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. (ed.). 1998.Italy's ‘Southern Question’: Orientalism in One Country. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. and P. Schneider. 1992. Going forward in reverse gear: culture, economy and political economy in the demographic transitions of a rural Sicilian town. Pp. 146–174 in J.R. Gillis, L.A. Tilly and D. Levine (eds),The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850–1970. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J.C. and P.T. Schneider. 1996.Festival of the Poor: Fertility Decline and the Ideology of Class in Sicily: 1860–1980. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seccombe, W. 1992.A Millennium of Family Change: Feudalism to Capitalism in Northwestern Europe. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, G.W. 1997. Family systems and demographic processes. Pp. 53–95 in D.I. Kertzer and T. Friche (eds),Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, A. 1997. Negotiating childhood: changing constructions of age for Norwegian children. Pp. 126–144 in A. James and A. Prout (eds),Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. 1999.Helping Out: Children's Labour in Ethnic Businesses. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, E. 1999. Should mothers work? Age and attitudes in Germany, Italy and Sweden.International Journal of Social Welfare 8(3): 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szreter, S. 1993. The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: a critical intellectual history.Population and Development Review 19(3): 659–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szreter, S. 1996a.Fertility, Class and Gender in Britain, 1860–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szreter, S. 1996b.Falling Fertilities and Changing Sexualities in Europe since c. 1850: A Comparative Survey of National Demographic Patterns. Canberra: Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trewin, Dennis. 2000.Unpaid Work and the Australian Economy, 1997. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1995.The World's Women 1995: Trends and Statistics. New York <http://www.un.org/Depts/unsd/gender>

  • US Census Bureau. International Data Base. <http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idbnew.html> Accessed: 10 October 2003.

  • Watkins, S.C. 1992. Demographic nationalism in Western Europe, 1870–1960. Pp. 270–289 in J.R. Gillis, L.A. Tilly and D. Levine (eds),The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850–1970. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Science and Planning, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University, 3001, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Pavla Miller

Authors
  1. Pavla Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavla Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, P. Demography and gender regimes: The case of Italians and ethnic traditions. Journal of Population Research 21, 199–222 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031898

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031898

Keywords

Search

Navigation