Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that marriages preceded by premarital cohabitation have higher rates of dissolution than those in which the couple marry without first living together. Most of this research relies on data generated by couples who cohabited in the 1970s and early 1980s when premarital cohabitation was relatively uncommon and usually of brief duration. Since then, premarital cohabitation in Australia has become normative and thus less prone to selection effects. The period of premarital cohabitation has also lengthened and is thus more likely to provide opportunities to screen out unviable matches. This paper uses national survey data from Australia to explore whether, in the light of these changes, the previously observed higher level of marital dissolution among those who live together before marrying has persisted. It demonstrates that the higher risk of marital dissolution among those who cohabited before marriage has declined substantially in the 1990s marriage cohort and, after controlling for selection factors, has disappeared altogether.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2002.Marriages and Divorces, Australia, 2001. Catalogue No. 3310.0. Canberra.
Axinn, William G. and Arland Thornton. 1992. The relation ship between cohabitation and divorce; selectivity or causal influence?Demography 29(3): 357–374.
Berrington, Ann and Ian Diamond. 1999. Marital dissolution among the 1958 British birth cohort: the role of cohabitation.Population Studies 53(1): 19–38.
Booth, Alan and David Johnson. 1988. Premarital cohabitation and marital success.Journal of Family Issues 9(3): 255–272.
Brown, Susan L. 2000. Union transitions among cohabitors: the significance of relationship assessments and expectations.Journal of Marriage and the Family 62: 833–846.
Brown, Susan L. and Alan Booth. 1996. Cohabitation versus marriage: a comparison of relationship quality.Journal of Marriage and the Family 58(3): 668–678.
Brüderl, Josef, Andreas Diekmann and Henriette Engelhardt. 1997. Premarital cohabitation and marital stability? An empirical study with the family survey.Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 49(2): 205–222.
Bumpass, Larry, Theresa Castro Martin and James Sweet. 1991. The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption.Journal of Family Issues 12(1): 22–42.
Clarkberg, Marin, Ross M. Stolzenberg and Linda J. Waite. 1995. Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions.Social Forces 74(2): 609–632.
Clements, M.L., A.D. Cordova, H.J. Markman and J.P. Laurenceau. 1997. The erosion of marital satisfaction over time and how to prevent it Pp. 335–355 in R.J. Sternberg and M. Hojjat (eds),Satisfaction in Close Relationships. New York: Guilford Press.
DeMaris, Alfred and William MacDonald. 1993. Premarital cohabitation and marital instability: a test of the unconventionality hypothesis.Journal of Marriage and the Family 55(2): 399–407.
DeMaris, Alfred and K. Vaninadha Rao. 1992. Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability in the United States: a reassessment.Journal of Marriage and the Family 54(1): 178–190.
de Vaus, David A. 2004.Diversity and Change in Australian Families. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies
de Vaus, David A. and Matthew Gray. 2004. Childhood transitions. Pp. 131–140 in D.A. de Vaus (ed.),Diversity and Change in Australian Families. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Giddens, Anthony. 1992.The Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glezer, Helen, Don Edgar and Andrew Prolisko. 1992. The importance of family background and early experiences on premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution. Paper presented at International Conference on Family Formation and Dissolution: Perspectives from East and West, Taipei, 21–23 May.
Kamp Dush, Claire, Catherine Cohan and Paul Amato. 2003. The relationship between cohabitation and marital quality and stability: change across cohorts?Journal of Marriage and Family 65(3): 539–549.
Karney, Benjamin and Tom Bradbury. 1997. Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(5): 1075–1092.
Kiernan, Katherine. 2002. Cohabitation in Western Europe: trends, issues and implications. Pp. 3–32 in A. Booth and A.C. Crouter (eds),Just Living Together: Implications of Cohabitation on Families, Children and Social Policy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
le Bourdais, Celine and Heather Juby. 2002. The impact of cohabitation on family life course in contemporary North America: insights from across the border. Pp. 107–118 in A. Booth and A.C. Crouter (eds),Just Living Together: Implications of Cohabitation on Families, Children and Social Policy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lillard, Lee A., Michael J. Brien and Linda J. Waite. 1995. Pre-marital cohabitation and subsequent marital dissolution: a matter of self-selection?Demography 32(3): 437–457.
Parker, Robyn. 2002. Why marriages last: a discussion of the literature.Research Paper No. 28. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Schoen, Robert. 1992. First unions and the stability of first marriages.Journal of Marriage and the Family 54(2): 281–284.
Smock, Pamela and Sanjiv Gupta. 2002. Cohabitation in contemporary North America. Pp. 53–84 in A. Booth and A.C. Crouter (eds),Just Living Together: Implications of Cohabitation on Families, Children and Social Policy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Teachman, Jay. 2003. Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital dissoution among women.Journal of Marriage and the Family 65(2): 444–455.
Teachman, Jay D. and Karen A. Polonko. 1990. Cohabitation and marital stability in the United States.Social Forces 69(1): 207–220.
Thornton, Arland, William Axinn and Daniel Hill. 1992. Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage.American Journal of Sociology 98(3): 628–651.
Watson, Nicole and Mark Wooden. 2002. The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey: Wave 1 Survey Methodology.HILDA Project Technical Paper Series No. 1/02, May 2002 (revised October 2002).
Wooden, Mark and Nicole Watson. 2001. The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey: An Introduction to the Proposed Survey Design and Plan.HILDA Project Discussion Paper Series No. 1/00, December 2000 (revised February 2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Vaus, D., Qu, L. & Weston, R. The disappearing link between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability, 1970–2001. Journal of Population Research 22, 99–118 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031824
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031824