Skip to main content
Log in

Equalizing population denominators for australian metropolitan areas

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most population data are collected and tabulated in an aggregate form by censuses around the world in which political and economic considerations determine the geographic unit of the aggregation. Large spatial variation in population size among, units can limit comparative analysis among different subregions. Census population counts are often used as the denominator in rate calculations. This paper proposes the design of new districts for Australian metropolitan areas that will decrease the absolute range in population among districts. The transport algorithm is used for aggregation of Collection Districts in order to achieve this goal. The transport algorithm proved efficient in assigning CDs to a more equitable alignment of population in the selected Statistical Divisions. This method affords the spatial comparison of city settlement and socio-economic variables as well as deriving a stable denominator for these comparisons. The results demonstrate the advantages of equalized population denominators over those associated with the current statistical districts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvanides, S. and S. Openshaw. 1999. Zone design for planning and policy analysis. Pp. 299–315 in J. Stillwell, S. Geertman and S. Openshaw (eds),Geographical Information and Planning: European Perspectives. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 1996.1996 Census of Population and Housing: How Australia Takes a Census. Catalogue No. 2903.0, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 1998.CDATA96 — Census of Population and Housing (CDROM). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M., M. Bell and P. Rees. 2000. Creating a temporally consistent spatial framework for the analysis of inter-regional migration in Australia.International Journal of Population Geography 6(1): 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. and J. Surkis. 1968. An operations research approach to racial desegregation of school systems.Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 1: 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, L.H. 1996. Protecting confidentiality in small population health and environmental statistics.Statistics in Medicine 15: 1895–1905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, P. A. 2000. New Gold Mountain: contrasts in Chinese migration and settlement patterns in Australia. Master’s thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

  • Fotheringham, A. S. and D. W. S. Wong. 1991. The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis.Environment and Planning A 23: 1025–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M.F. 1979. The aggregation problem in location-allocation.Geographical Analysis 11(3): 240–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, F.L. 1973. Location criteria for high schools: student transportation and racial integration.Research Paper No. 150. Chicago: Department of Geography, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, L.B. and H.M. Taylor. 1969. School rezoning to achieve racial balance: a linear programming approach.Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 3: 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, S.W. and J.B. Weaver. 1965. Non-partisan political redistricting by computer.Operations Research 13: 998–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F.L. 1967. Ethnic concentration and assimilation: an Australian case study.Social Forces 45(3): 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. and I.L. Rao. 1995. Algorithms for reengineering 1991 Census geography.Environment and Planning A 27: 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. and P.J. Taylor. 1981. The modifiable areal unit problem. Chapter 5 inQuantitative Geography: A British View. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen, M., R. Johnston and J. Forrest. 2000. Ethnic enclaves in New Zealand?International Journal of Population Geography 6(5): 325–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, S.H. and S.-H. Chung. 1989. Effects of spatial system design on spatial interaction models. 1: The spatial system definition problem.Environment and Planning A 21: 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. 1971.An Introduction to Spatial Allocation Analysis. Commission on College Geography, Resource Paper No. 9. Washington DC: Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.J. 1977.Quantitative Methods in Geography: An Introduction to Spatial Analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodall, M., R. Cromley, R.K. Semple and M. Green. 1978. The elimination of racially identifiable schools.Professional Geographer 32: 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, M. 1963. Hinterland delimitation: a distance minimizing approach.Professional Geographer 15: 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Fernald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernald, P.A., Cromley, R.G. Equalizing population denominators for australian metropolitan areas. Journal of Population Research 22, 79–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031805

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031805

Keywords

Navigation