Conclusion
An effective WTO is critical for developing countries —the alternatives, bilateral and regional agreements, will give rise to trade diversion and discrimination, and most likely exclude sectors such as agriculture and policies such as antidumping. Developing countries have a strong incentive to put together an agenda that offers potential benefits to OECD countries as well as themselves. The Singapore issues are arguably not necessary to move forward on the market access agenda. There is huge scope to trade “concessions” on tariffs — both applied rates and tariff binding. The same is true for access to service markets. A refocused effort centered on market access, complemented by an emphasis on transparency predictability and reciprocity, could help realize the development promise of the Doha round.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Michael J. Finger: The Doha Agenda and Development: A View from the Uruguay Round, Asian Development Bank 2002.
Aaditya Mattoo: Liberalizing Trade in Services, World Bank 2003, mimeo (www.worldbank.org/trade).
B. Hoekman, F. Ng, M. Olarreaga: Reducing Agricultural Tariffs versus Domestic Support: What's More Important for Developing Countries?, 2003, mimeo.
B. Hoekman, C. Michalopoulos, L. Alan Winters: More Favorable and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries: Towards a New Approach in the WTO, World Bank Policy Research Paper 3107, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The views expressed are personal and should not be attributed to the World Bank.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoekman, B., Olarreaga, M. Economic development and the WTO: Back to basics?. Intereconomics 38, 232–234 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031721
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031721