Journal of Plant Biology

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 22–27

Morphology and anatomy of mature embryos and seedlings in parasitic angiospermCuscuta japonica

Article
  • 206 Downloads

Abstract

Morphological and anatomical features of mature embryos and seedlings were observed at different growth stages in the parasitic angiospermCuscuta japonica Choisy. The spirally coiled embryos from scarified seeds had no cotyledons but possessed blunt radicles. Seeds germinated at 30°C in the dark. Although most embryo cells incubated for 16 h did not have starch grains, the shoot cells of three-day-old seedlings possessed numerous starch grains. After these seedlings were transferred to a lightened growth chamber, all the shoot apical regions of seedlings grown for 6,8, and 10 days became greenish and hooked. Most of the shoot cells, including the green apical parts, contained abundant starch grains. The hooks opened only when one seedling made contact with another seedling. This suggested that the green and hooked shoot apical regions played an important role in searching for and twining about their host plants. In some two-day-old seedlings, the massive roots were circular or semi-circular. This enabled the shoot axes to stand erect on some substratum. It would assist the shoots in making contact with the host plant. In eight-day-old seedlings, the green apical regions also were hooked and the roots were considerably degraded.

Keywords

Anatomy Cuscuta japonica Embryo Morphology Parasitic angiosperm Seedling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Fedortschuk W (1931) Embryologische Untersuchung vonCuscuta monogyna Vahl undCuscuta epithymum L. Planta 14: 94–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fujita T (1964) Phylloitaxis of Cuscuta. Bot Mag Tokyo 77: 73–76Google Scholar
  3. Ismail AMA, Obeid M (1976) A study of assimilation inCuscuta hyaline Heyne ex Roth,Orobanche ramosa L andStriga hermonthica Benth. Weed Res 16: 87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Johri BM, Tiagai B (1952) Floral morphology and seed formation inCuscuta reflexa Roxb. Phytomorphology 2: 162–180Google Scholar
  5. Koch L (1880) Die Kleeund Flachsseide (Cuscuta epithymum und C.epilinum). Untersuchungen ueber deren Entwicklung, Verbreitung und Vertilgung, Carl Winthers Universitaetsbuchhandlung, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuijt J (1969) The Biology of Parasitic Flowering Plants. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp 136–143Google Scholar
  7. Lane HC, Kasperbauer MJ (1968) Photomorphogenetic responses of dodder seedlings. Plant Physiol 40: 109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Loo S-W (1946) Cultivation of excised stem tip of dodder in vitro. Amer J Bot 33: 295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lyshede OB (1985) Morphological and anatomical features ofCuscuta pedicellata and C.campestris. Nord J Bot 5: 65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyshede OB (1986) Fine structural features of the tuberous radicular end of the seedling ofCuscuta pedicellata. Ber Deutsch Bot Ges 99: 105–109Google Scholar
  11. Lyshede OB (1989) Electron microscopy of the filiform seedling axis ofCuscuta pedicellata. Bot Gaz 150: 230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MacLeod DC (1963) The parasitism ofCuscuta. New Phytol 62: 257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Macpherson GE (1921) Comparison of development in dodder and morning glory. Bot Gaz 71: 392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pattee HE, Allred KR, Wiebe HH (1965) Photosynthesis in dodder. Weeds 13: 193–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spurr A (1969) A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastr Res 26: 31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tiagai B (1951) A contribution to the morphology and embryology ofCuscuta hyaline Roth and C.palaniflora Tenore. Phytomorphology 1: 9–21Google Scholar
  17. Truscott FH (1966) Some aspects of morphogenesis inCuscuta gronovii. Amer J Bot 53: 739–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zimmermann CE (1962) Autotrophic development of dodder (Cuscuta pentagona Engelm.) in vitro. Crop Sci 2: 449–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Korea 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Science EducationChosun UniversityKwangjuKorea
  2. 2.Department of BiologySilla UniversityPusanKorea
  3. 3.Department of Genetic EngineeringSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations